The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Treasure of the Humble
    
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: The Treasure of the Humble

Author: Maurice Maeterlinck

Translator: Alfred Sutro

Release date: February 9, 2015 [eBook #48217]

Language: English

Credits: Produced by Giovanni Fini, Mark C. Orton and the Online
        Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
        file was produced from images generously made available
        by The Internet Archive)


*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE TREASURE OF THE HUMBLE ***




Produced by Giovanni Fini, Mark C. Orton and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)







                         TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES:

—Obvious print and punctuation errors were corrected.

—Bold text has been rendered as =bold text=.




                            The Treasure of
                              the Humble

                       _By_ Maurice Maeterlinck

                     _Translated by_ Alfred Sutro

                 With _Introduction by_ A. B. Walkley


                 London: George Allen, _Ruskin House_

                   156 Charing Cross Road      mcmv




 _First Edition, March 1897. Reprinted October 1897; September 1901;
 January 1903; May 1904; November 1905._


                  Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO.
                        At the Ballantyne Press




                                =_TO_=

                      _MADAME GEORGETTE LEBLANC_




                      The Treasure of the Humble

[Illustration: LOGO]




                            CONTENTS


  INTRODUCTION                                _Page_    ix

  SILENCE                                                1

  THE AWAKENING OF THE SOUL                             23

  THE PRE-DESTINED                                      43

  MYSTIC MORALITY                                       59

  ON WOMEN                                              75

  THE TRAGICAL IN DAILY LIFE                            95

  THE STAR                                             121

  THE INVISIBLE GOODNESS                               147

  THE DEEPER LIFE                                      169

  THE INNER BEAUTY                                     197




INTRODUCTION


WITH M. Maeterlinck as a dramatist the world is pretty well acquainted.
This little volume presents him in the new character of a philosopher
and an æsthetician. And it is in some sort an ‘apology’ for his
theatre, the one being to the other as theory to practice. Reversing
the course prescribed by Mr. Squeers for his pupils, M. Maeterlinck,
having cleaned w-i-n-d-e-r, winder, now goes and spells it. He began
by visualising and synthetising his ideas of life; here you shall find
him trying to analyse these ideas and consumed with anxiety to tell
us the truth that is in him. It is not a truth for all markets; he is
at no pains to conceal that. He appeals, as every mystic must, to the
elect; M. Anatole France would say, to the _âmes bien nées_. If we are
not sealed of the tribe of Plotinus, he warns us to go elsewhere. ‘If,
plunging thine eyes into thyself—it is this same Plotinus that he is
quoting—‘thou dost not feel the charm of beauty, it is in vain that,
thy disposition being such, thou shouldst seek the charm of beauty; for
thou wouldst seek it only with that which is ugly and impure. Therefore
it is that the discourse we hold here is not addressed to all men.’ If
we are to follow him in his expedition to a philosophic Ultima Thule,
we must have the mind for that adventure. ‘We are here,’ as he tells
us elsewhere of the ‘stiff’ but, it seems, ‘admirable’ Ruysbroeck,
‘all of a sudden on the borderland of human thought and far across the
Arctic circle of the spirit. There is no ordinary cold, no ordinary
dark there, and yet you shall find there naught but flames and light.
But to those who arrive without having trained their minds to these new
perceptions, the light and the flames are as dark and as cold as though
they were painted.’ This means that the intelligence, the reason, will
not suffice of themselves; we must have faith. There are passages in
the book which may provoke a sniff from Mr. Worldly Wiseman; but we
must beware of the Voltairean spirit, or this will be a closed book
to us. ‘We live by admiration, hope, and love,’ said Wordsworth. And
we understand by them, M. Maeterlinck would add. I fear we are not
all of us found worthy of the mystical frame of mind. But it is a
psychological fact, like another; and if we can only examine it from
the outside, we can at least bring patience and placidity to the task.
The point is: has M. Maeterlinck anything to say? It will be found, I
think, that he has.

All men, the world has long been assured, are born Aristotelians or
Platonists. There cannot be a doubt about M. Maeterlinck’s philosophic
birthright. He may say, as Paul Verlaine sang:

  Moi, j’allais rêvant du divin Platon,
  Sous l’œil clignotant des bleus becs de gaz.

More strictly, he is a Neo-Platonist. His remark about the Admirable
Ruysbroeck’s idea is equally true of his own. ‘I fancy that all those
who have not lived in the intimacy of Plato and of the Neo-Platonists
of Alexandria, will not go far with this reading.’ He quotes Plotinus,
‘the great Plotinus, who, of all the intellects known to me, draws
the nearest to the divine.’ He cites Porphyry and the Gnostics and
Swedenborg. These are not exactly popular authors of the moment. But
M. Maeterlinck, it is plain, has devoured them; his is not what Pope
called ‘index-learning.’ Plotinus (205-270 A.D.) stood between two
worlds, the old and the new; and he made the best of both. He enlarged
the boundaries of art by discerning in the idea of beauty an inward
and spiritual grace not to be found in the ‘Platonic idea.’ That, too,
is what M. Maeterlinck is striving for: a larger idea of beauty, and a
better apprehension of its inward and spiritual grace.

His cardinal doctrine will, I conjecture, prove to be something like
this. What should be of most account for us all is not external fact,
but the supra-sensuous world. ‘What we know is not interesting’; the
really interesting things are those which we can only divine—the
veiled life of the soul, the crepuscular region of subconsciousness,
our ‘borderland’ feelings, all that lies in the strange ‘neutral
zone’ between the frontiers of consciousness and unconsciousness. The
mystery of life is what makes life worth living. ‘’Twas a little being
of mystery, like every one else,’ says the old King Arkel of the dead
Mélisande. We are such stuff as dreams are made of, might be the
‘refrain’ of all M. Maeterlinck’s plays, and of most of these essays.
He is penetrated by the feeling of the mystery in all human creatures,
whose every act is regulated by far-off influences and obscurely rooted
in things unexplained. Mystery is within us and around us. Of reality
we can only get now and then the merest glimpse. Our senses are too
gross. Between the invisible world and our own there is doubtless an
intimate concordance; but it escapes us. We grope among shadows towards
the unknown. Even the new conquests of what we vainly suppose to be
‘exact’ thought only deepen the mystery of life. There is, for example,
the Schopenhauerian theory of love. We had fancied we could at least
choose our loves in freedom: but ‘we are told that a thousand centuries
divide us from ourselves when we choose the woman we love, and that
the first kiss of the betrothed is but the seal which thousands of
hands, craving for birth, have impressed upon the lips of the mother
they desire.’ And so with the ‘heredity’ of the men of science. ‘We
know that the dead do not die. We know that it is not in our churches
they are to be found, but in the houses, the habits of us all.’ What
was there in the old notion of Destiny so mysterious as this double
thraldom of ours—thraldom to the dead and to the unborn? Conclusion:
mysticism is your only wear. In the mystics alone is certitude. ‘If
it be true, as has been said, that every man is a Shakespeare in his
dreams, we have to ask ourselves whether every man, in his waking life,
is not an inarticulate mystic, a thousandfold more transcendental
than those circumscribed by speech.’ In silence is our only chance of
knowing one another. And ‘mystic truths have over ordinary truths a
strange privilege; they can neither age nor die.’ From all this you
see M. Maeterlinck’s train of thought. He would fix our minds upon the
obscure, pre-conscious, what M. Faguet calls the _incunabulary_ life of
the soul. He finds no epithets too fine for this: the higher life, the
transcendental life, the divine life, the absolute life.

Whatever we may think of these ideas in themselves, there is no doubt
that the man who expresses them sounds a new and individual note. They
show a reaction against the whole effort of modern literature, which
has been nothing if not positive, quasi-scientific, ever on the prowl
for ‘documents.’ And if for no other reason than that, this book, I
submit, would have peculiar significance and value.

But there is at least one other reason. M. Maeterlinck puts forward
a plea, and a plea not lightly to be dismissed, for a new æsthetic
of the drama. The mystery which he finds everywhere around us and
within us he would bring into the theatre. If there is one position
which the whole world supposed itself to have definitively taken up,
it is the position that the theatre lives by action and to offer
us an exhibition of the will. Therein, for instance, M. Ferdinand
Brunetière finds the _differentia_ of drama; it is the struggle of a
will, conscious of itself, against obstacles. Traversing this position
M. Maeterlinck boldly asks whether a ‘static’ theatre is impossible,
a theatre of mood not of movement, a theatre where nothing material
happens and where everything immaterial is felt. Even as it is, the
real beauty and purport of a tragedy is not seldom to be found in
that part of its dialogue which is superficially ‘useless.’ ‘Certain
it is that in the ordinary drama the indispensable dialogue by no
means corresponds to reality.... One may even affirm that the poem
draws the nearer to beauty and loftier truth in the measure that it
eliminates words that merely explain the action and replaces them by
others that reveal not the so-called “soul-state,” but I know not
what intangible and unceasing striving of the soul towards its beauty
and its truth.’ The frivolous will be reminded here, perhaps, of the
old stage direction for the miser: ‘Leans against a wall and grows
generous.’ Others who remember their Xenophon will bethink them of a
certain discussion which Socrates had with Parrhasius on the question,
‘Can the unseen be imitated?’ (_Soc. Memorabilia_, iii. 10). It may be
that M. Maeterlinck’s ‘static’ theatre is an unrealisable dream; but it
is a seductive one, by contrast with the reality. Do not all of us who
are condemned to spend much of our time in the playhouse occasionally
share M. Maeterlinck’s feeling of repugnance? ‘When I go to the
theatre, I feel as though I were spending a few hours in the midst of
my ancestors, who looked upon life as something that was primitive,
arid, and brutal; but this conception of theirs scarcely even lingers
in my memory, and surely it is not one that I can any longer share....
I had hoped to be shown some act of life traced back to its source and
to its mystery by connecting links that my daily occupations afford
me neither power nor occasion to study. I had gone thither hoping that
the beauty, the grandeur, and the earnestness of my humble day-by-day
existence would for one instant be revealed to me ... whereas,
almost invariably, all that I beheld was but a man who would tell me
at wearisome length why he was jealous, why he poisoned, or why he
killed.’ And so he would have the drama make an effort to show us ‘how
truly wonderful is the mere fact of living’; he would have it tackle
‘presentiments, the strange impression produced by a chance meeting or
a look, a decision that the unknown side of human reason had governed,
an intervention or a force inexplicable and yet understood, the secret
laws of sympathy and antipathy, elective and instinctive affinities,
the overwhelming influence of things unsaid.’

How is it all to come about? When we ask this question we find
ourselves in the position of the lady who had been discussing the
subject of a future state with Dr. Johnson. ‘She seemed desirous of
knowing more,’ says Boswell, ‘but he left the question in obscurity.’
It is there that M. Maeterlinck, like a true mystic, is content to
leave most of his questions. ‘The time has not yet come,’ he says with
an engaging candour, ‘when we can speak lucidly of these things.’ One
thinks of Sir Thomas Browne’s quaint fancy. ‘A dialogue between two
infants in the womb concerning the state of this world might handsomely
illustrate our ignorance of the next, whereof methinks we yet discourse
in Plato’s den, and are but embryon philosophers.’ Maybe M. Maeterlinck
is but an embryon philosopher, one who discourses in Plato’s den. But
I think we must all recognise the native distinction of his mind, the
fastidious delicacy of his taste, his abiding and insatiable love of
beauty. What he says, exquisitely enough but perhaps too liberally, of
every man—‘to every man there come noble thoughts that pass across his
heart like great white birds’—is certainly true of himself. Wherefore
one may venture to invite people to his book as Heraclitus welcomed
guests to his kitchen: ‘Enter boldly, for here also there are gods.’

  A. B. W.




SILENCE




SILENCE


‘SILENCE and Secrecy!’ cries Carlyle. ‘Altars might still be raised to
them (were this an altar-building time) for universal worship. Silence
is the element in which great things fashion themselves together,
that at length they may emerge, full-formed and majestic, into the
daylight of Life, which they are henceforth to rule. Not William the
Silent only, but all the considerable men I have known, and the most
undiplomatic and unstrategic of these, forbore to babble of what they
were creating and projecting. Nay, in thy own mean perplexities, do
thou thyself but _hold thy tongue for one day_; on the morrow how
much clearer are thy purposes and duties; what wreck and rubbish have
these mute workmen within thee swept away, when intrusive noises were
shut out! Speech is too often not, as the Frenchman defined it, the art
of concealing Thought, but of quite stifling and suspending Thought,
so that there is none to conceal. Speech, too, is great, but not
the greatest. As the Swiss inscription says: _Sprechen ist Silbern,
Schweigen ist goldern_ (Speech is silver, Silence is golden); or, as I
might rather express it, Speech is of Time, Silence is of Eternity.

‘Bees will not work except in darkness; Thought will not work except in
Silence; neither will Virtue work except in secrecy.’

       *       *       *       *       *

IT is idle to think that, by means of words, any real communication
can ever pass from one man to another. The lips or the tongue may
represent the soul, even as a cipher or a number may represent a
picture of Memling; but from the moment that we have _something to say
to each other_, we are _compelled_ to hold our peace: and if at such
times we do not listen to the urgent commands of silence, invisible
though they be, we shall have suffered an eternal loss that all the
treasures of human wisdom cannot make good; for we shall have let slip
the opportunity of listening to another soul, and of giving existence,
be it only for an instant, to our own; and many lives there are in
which such opportunities do not present themselves twice....

It is only when life is sluggish within us that we speak: only at
moments when reality lies far away, and we _do not wish_ to be
conscious of our brethren. And no sooner do we speak than something
warns us that the divine gates are closing. Thus it comes about that
we hug silence to us, and are very misers of it; and even the most
reckless will not squander it on the first comer. There is an instinct
of the superhuman truths within us which warns us that it is dangerous
to be silent with one whom we do not wish to know, or do not love: for
words may pass between men, but let silence have had its instant of
activity, and it will never efface itself; and indeed the true life,
the only life that leaves a trace behind, is made up of silence alone.
Bethink it well, in that silence to which you must again have recourse,
so that it may explain itself, by itself; and if it be granted to you
to descend for one moment into your soul, into the depths where the
angels dwell, it is not the words spoken by the creature you loved so
dearly that you will recall, or the gestures that he made, but it is,
above all, the silences that you have lived together that will come
back to you: for it is the _quality_ of those silences that alone
revealed the quality of your love and your souls.

So far I have considered _active_ silence only, for there is a
_passive_ silence, which is the shadow of sleep, of death or
non-existence. It is the silence of lethargy, and is even less to
be dreaded than speech, so long as it slumbers; but beware lest a
sudden incident awake it, for then would its brother, the great active
silence, at once rear himself upon his throne. Be on your guard. Two
souls would draw near each other: the barriers would fall asunder, the
gates fly open, and the life of every day be replaced by a life of
deepest earnest, wherein all are defenceless; a life in which laughter
dares not show itself, in which there is no obeying, in which nothing
can evermore be forgotten....

And it is because we all of us know of this sombre power and its
perilous manifestations, that we stand in so deep a dread of silence.
We can bear, when need must be, the silence of ourselves, that of
isolation: but the silence of many—silence multiplied—and above
all the silence of a crowd—these are supernatural burdens, whose
inexplicable weight brings dread to the mightiest soul. We spend a
goodly portion of our lives in seeking places where silence is not. No
sooner have two or three men met than their one thought is to drive
away the invisible enemy; and of how many ordinary friendships may it
not be said that their only foundation is the common hatred of silence!
And if, all efforts notwithstanding, it contrives to steal among a
number of men, disquiet will fall upon them, and their restless eyes
will wander in the mysterious direction of things unseen: and each man
will hurriedly go his way, flying before the intruder: and henceforth
they will avoid each other, dreading lest a similar disaster should
again befall them, and suspicious as to whether there be not one among
them who would treacherously throw open the gate to the enemy....

In the lives of most of us, it will not happen more than twice or
thrice that silence is really understood and freely admitted. It
is only on the most solemn occasions that the inscrutable guest is
welcomed; but, when such come about, there are few who do not make the
welcome worthy, for even in the lives of the most wretched there are
moments when they know how to act, even as though they knew already
that which is known to the gods. Remember the day on which, without
fear in your heart, you met your first silence. The dread hour had
sounded; silence went before your soul. You saw it rising from the
unspeakable abysses of life, from the depths of the inner sea of
horror or beauty, and you did not fly.... It was at a home-coming,
on the threshold of a departure, in the midst of a great joy, at the
pillow of a death-bed, on the approach of a dire misfortune. Bethink
you of those moments when all the secret jewels shone forth on you,
and the slumbering truths sprung to life, and tell me whether silence,
then, was not good and necessary, whether the caresses of the enemy
you had so persistently shunned were not truly divine? The kisses of
the silence of misfortune—and it is above all at times of misfortune
that silence caresses us—can never be forgotten; and therefore it
is that those to whom they have come more often than to others are
worthier than those others. They alone know, perhaps, how voiceless
and unfathomable are the waters on which the fragile shell of daily
life reposes: they have approached nearer to God, and the steps they
have taken towards the light are steps that can never be lost, for the
soul may not rise, perhaps, but it can never sink.... ‘Silence, the
great Empire of Silence,’ says Carlyle again—he who understood so well
the empire of the life which holds us—‘higher than the stars, deeper
than the Kingdom of Death!... Silence, and the great silent men!...
Scattered here and there, each in his department; silently thinking,
silently working; whom no morning newspaper makes mention of! They are
the salt of the earth. A country that has none or few of these is in a
bad way. Like a forest which had no _roots_; which had all turned to
leaves and boughs; which must soon wither and be no forest.’

But the real silence, which is greater still and more difficult of
approach than the material silence of which Carlyle speaks—the real
silence is not one of those gods that can desert mankind. It surrounds
us on every side; it is the source of the undercurrents of our life;
and let one of us but knock, with trembling fingers, at the door of the
abyss, it is always by the same attentive silence that this door will
be opened.

It is a thing that knows no limit, and before it all men are equal;
and the silence of king or slave, in presence of death, or grief, or
love, reveals the same features, hides beneath its impenetrable mantle
the self-same treasure. For this is the essential silence of our soul,
our most inviolable sanctuary, and its secret can never be lost; and,
were the first born of men to meet the last inhabitant of the earth, a
kindred impulse would sway them, and they would be voiceless in their
caresses, in their terror and their tears; a kindred impulse would
sway them, and all that could be said without falsehood would call for
no spoken word: and, the centuries notwithstanding, there would come
to them, at the same moment, as though one cradle had held them both,
comprehension of that which the tongue shall not learn to tell before
the world ceases....

No sooner are the lips still than the soul awakes, and sets forth on
its labours; for silence is an element that is full of surprise, danger
and happiness, and in these the soul possesses itself in freedom. If
it be indeed your desire to give yourself over to another, be silent;
and if you fear being silent with him—unless this fear be the proud
uncertainty, or hunger, of the love that yearns for prodigies—fly
from him, for your soul knows well how far it may go. There are men in
whose presence the greatest of heroes would not dare to be silent; and
even the soul that has nothing to conceal trembles lest another should
discover its secret. Some there are that have no silence, and that kill
the silence around them, and these are the only creatures that pass
through life unperceived. To them it is not given to cross the zone of
revelation, the great zone of the firm and faithful light. We cannot
conceive what sort of man is he who has never been silent. It is to us
as though his soul were featureless. ‘We do not know each other yet,’
wrote to me one whom I hold dear above all others, ‘we have not yet
dared to be silent together.’ And it was true: already did we love each
other so deeply that we shrank from the superhuman ordeal. And each
time that silence fell upon us—the angel of the supreme truth, the
messenger that brings to the heart the tidings of the unknown—each
time did we feel that our souls were craving mercy on their knees,
were begging for a few hours more of innocent falsehood, a few hours
of ignorance, a few hours of childhood.... And none the less must its
hour come. It is the sun of love, and it ripens the fruit of the soul,
as the sun of heaven ripens the fruits of the earth. But it is not
without cause that men fear it; for none can ever tell what will be the
_quality_ of the silence which is about to fall upon them. Though all
words may be akin, every silence differs from its fellow; and, with
rare exceptions, it is an entire destiny that will be governed by the
_quality_ of this first silence which is descending upon two souls.
They blend: we know not where, for the reservoirs of silence lie far
above the reservoirs of thought, and the strange resultant brew is
either sinisterly bitter or profoundly sweet. Two souls, admirable both
and of equal power, may yet give birth to a hostile silence, and wage
pitiless war against each other in the darkness; while it may be that
the soul of a convict shall go forth and commune in divine silence with
the soul of a virgin. The result can never be foretold; all this comes
to pass in a heaven that never warns; and therefore it is that the
tenderest of lovers will often defer to the last hour of all the solemn
entry of the great revealer of the depths of our being....

For they too are well aware—the love that is truly love brings the
most frivolous back to life’s centre—they too are well aware that all
that had gone before was but as children playing outside the gates, and
that it is now that the walls are falling and existence lying bare.
Their silence will be even as are the gods within them; and if in this
first silence, there be not harmony, there can be no love in their
souls, for the silence will never change. It may rise or it may fall
between two souls, but _its nature_ can never alter; and even until the
death of the lovers will it retain the form, the attitude and the power
that were its own when, for the first time, it came into the room.

As we advance through life, it is more and more brought home to us
that nothing takes place that is not in accord with some curious,
preconceived design: and of this we never breathe a word, we scarcely
dare to let our minds dwell upon it, but of its existence, somewhere
above our heads, we are absolutely convinced. The most fatuous of men
smiles, at the first encounters, as though he were the accomplice
of the destiny of his brethren. And in this domain, even those who
can speak the most profoundly realise—they, perhaps, more than
others—that words can never express the real, special relationship
that exists between two beings. Were I to speak to you at this
moment of the gravest things of all—of love, death or destiny—it
is not love, death or destiny that I should touch; and, my efforts
notwithstanding, there would always remain between us a truth which
had not been spoken, which we had not even thought of speaking; and
yet it is this truth only, voiceless though it has been, which will
have lived with us for an instant, and by which we shall have been
wholly absorbed. For that truth was _our truth_ as regards death,
destiny or love, and it was in silence only that we could perceive it.
And nothing save only the silence will have had any importance. ‘My
sisters,’ says a child in the fairy-story, ‘you have each of you a
secret thought—I wish to know it.’ We, too, have something that people
wish to know, but it is hidden far above the secret thought—it is
our secret silence. But all questions are useless. When our spirit is
alarmed, its own agitation becomes a barrier to the second life that
lives in this secret; and, would we know what it is that lies hidden
there, we must cultivate silence among ourselves, for it is then only
that for one instant the eternal flowers unfold their petals, the
mysterious flowers whose form and colour are ever changing in harmony
with the soul that is by their side. As gold and silver are weighed in
pure water, so does the soul test its weight in silence, and the words
that we let fall have no meaning apart from the silence that wraps them
round. If I tell some one that I love him—as I may have told a hundred
others—my words will convey nothing to him; but the silence which will
ensue, if I do indeed love him, will make clear in what depths lie the
roots of my love, and will in its turn give birth to a conviction, that
shall itself be silent; and in the course of a lifetime, this silence
and this conviction will never again be the same....

Is it not silence that determines and fixes the savour of love?
Deprived of it, love would lose its eternal essence and perfume. Who
has not known those silent moments which separated the lips to reunite
the souls? It is these that we must ever seek. There is no silence more
docile than the silence of love, and it is indeed the only one that
we may claim for ourselves alone. The other great silences, those of
death, grief, or destiny, do not belong to us. They come towards us at
their own hour, following in the track of events, and those whom they
do not meet need not reproach themselves. But we can all go forth to
meet the silences of love. They lie in wait for us, night and day, at
our threshold, and are no less beautiful than their brothers. And it
is thanks to them that those who have seldom wept may know the life of
the soul almost as intimately as those to whom much grief has come:
and therefore it is that such of us as have loved deeply have learnt
many secrets that are unknown to others: for thousands and thousands of
things quiver in silence on the lips of true friendship and love, that
are not to be found in the silence of other lips, to which friendship
and love are unknown....




THE AWAKENING OF THE SOUL




THE AWAKENING OF THE SOUL


A TIME will come, perhaps—and many things there are that herald its
approach—a time will come perhaps when our souls will know of each
other without the intermediary of the senses. Certain it is that there
passes not a day but the soul adds to its ever-widening domain. It is
very much nearer to our visible self, and takes a far greater part
in all our actions, than was the case two or three centuries ago. A
spiritual epoch is perhaps upon us; an epoch to which a certain number
of analogies are found in history. For there are periods recorded, when
the soul, in obedience to unknown laws, seemed to rise to the very
surface of humanity, whence it gave clearest evidence of its existence
and of its power. And this existence and this power reveal themselves
in countless ways, diverse and unforeseen. It would seem, at moments
such as these, as though humanity were on the point of struggling from
beneath the crushing burden of matter that weighs it down. A spiritual
influence is abroad that soothes and comforts; and the sternest, direst
laws of Nature yield here and there. Men are nearer to themselves,
nearer to their brothers; in the look of their eyes, in the love of
their hearts, there is deeper earnestness and tenderer fellowship.
Their understanding of women, children, animals, plants—nay, of
all things—becomes more pitiful and more profound. The statues,
paintings and writings that these men have left us may perhaps not be
perfect, but, none the less does there dwell therein a secret power,
an indescribable grace, held captive and imperishable for ever. A
mysterious brotherhood and love must have shone forth from the eyes of
these men; and signs of a life that we cannot explain are everywhere,
vibrating by the side of the life of every day.

Such knowledge as we possess of ancient Egypt induces us to believe
that she passed through one of these spiritual epochs. At a very remote
period in the history of India, the soul must have drawn very near
to the surface of life, to a point, indeed, that it has never since
touched; and unto this day strange phenomena owe their being to the
recollection, or lingering remnants, of its almost immediate presence.
Many other similar moments there have been, when the spiritual element
seemed to be struggling far down in the depths of humanity, like a
drowning man battling for life beneath the waters of a great river.
Bethink you of Persia, for instance, of Alexandria, and the two mystic
centuries of the Middle Ages.

On the other hand, there have been centuries in which purest intellect
and beauty reigned supreme, though the soul lay unrevealed. Thus it
was far from Greece and Rome, and from the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries in France. (As regards this last, however, we may perhaps
be speaking only of the surface; for in its depths many mysteries lie
concealed—we must remember Claude de Saint-Martin, Cagliostro—who is
passed over too lightly—Pascalis, and many others besides.) Something
is lacking, we know not what; barriers are stretched across the secret
passages; the eyes of beauty are sealed. Well-nigh hopeless, indeed, is
the attempt to convey this in words, or to explain why the atmosphere
of divinity and fatality that enwraps the Greek dramas does not seem
to us to be the true atmosphere of the soul. Majestic and all-abiding
as is the mystery that lingers on the horizon of these matchless
tragedies, it is yet not the pitiful, brotherly mystery, quickened into
profound activity, that we find in other works less great and less
beautiful. And to come nearer to our own time—though Racine may indeed
be the unerring poet of the woman’s heart, who would dare to claim for
him that he has ever taken one step towards her soul? What can you
tell me of the soul of Andromache, of Britannicus? Racine’s characters
have no knowledge of themselves beyond the words by which they express
themselves, and not one of these words can pierce the dykes that keep
back the sea. His men and women are alone, fearfully alone, on the
surface of a planet that no longer revolves in the heavens. If they
were to be silent, they would cease to be. They have no _invisible
principle_, and one might almost believe that some isolating substance
had crept between their spirit and themselves, between the life which
has its roots in every created thing and that which, for one fleeting
moment, brushes against a passion, a grief or a hope. Truly there are
centuries in which the soul lies dormant and slumbers undisturbed.

But to-day it is clearly making a mighty effort. Its manifestations
are everywhere, and they are strangely urgent, pressing, imperious
even, as though the order had been given, and no time must be lost.
It must be preparing for a decisive struggle; and none can foretell
the issues that may be dependent on the result, be this victory or
flight. Perhaps never to this day has it enlisted in its service such
diverse, irresistible forces. It is as though an invisible wall hemmed
it in, and one knows not whether it be quivering in its death-throb
or quickened by a new life. I will say nothing of the occult powers,
of which signs are everywhere—of magnetism, telepathy, levitation,
the unsuspected properties of radiating matter, and countless other
phenomena that are battering down the door of orthodox science. These
things are known of all men, and can easily be verified. And truly they
may well be the merest bagatelle by the side of the vast upheaval that
is actually in progress, for the soul is like a dreamer, enthralled
by sleep, who struggles with all his might to move an arm or raise an
eyelid.

Other regions there are where its action is even more effective,
though the crowd there is less regardful, and none but trained eyes
can see. Does it not seem as though the supreme cry of the soul were
at last about to pierce the dense clouds of error that still envelop
it in music? Do not certain pictures by foreign painters reveal the
sacred majesty of an invisible presence, as it never has been revealed
before? Are there not masterpieces in literature that are illumined
by a flame which differs in its very essence from the strangest
beacon-fires that lit up the writings of bygone days? A transformation
of silence—strange and inexplicable—is upon us, and the reign of
the _positive sublime_, absolute to this day, seems destined to be
overthrown. I will not linger on this subject, for the time has not
yet come for lucid discussion of these things; but I feel that a more
pressing offer of spiritual freedom has rarely been made to mankind.
Nay, there are moments when it bears the semblance of an ultimatum; and
therefore does it behove us to neglect nothing, but indeed with all
eagerness to accept this imperious invitation, that is like unto the
dream that is lost for ever, unless instantaneously seized. We must be
heedful; it is not without fit reason that our soul bestirs itself.

Though it be perhaps from the table-lands of speculative thought that
this agitation is the most clearly to be noted, yet may there well be
signs of it in the most ordinary paths of life, unsuspected of any;
for not a flower opens on the hill-top but at length it falls into
the valley. Has it fallen already? I know not. But this much at least
is abundantly proved to us, that in the work-a-day lives of the very
humblest of men, spiritual phenomena manifest themselves—mysterious,
direct workings, that bring soul nearer to soul; and of all this we
can find no record in former times. And the reason must surely be
that these things were not so clearly evident then: for at every
period there have been men who penetrated to the innermost recesses
of life, to its most secret affinities: and all that they learned of
the heart, the soul and the spirit of their epoch has been handed
down to us. It may well be that similar influences were at work
even in those times; but they could not have been as universal, as
active and vigorous as they are to-day, nor could they have sunk so
deep into the very life-springs of the race; for in that case, they
had surely not escaped the notice of those sages, and been passed by
in silence. And I do not refer now to ‘scientific spiritism,’ or its
telepathic phenomena, to ‘materialisation,’ or other manifestations
that I have enumerated above: but to the incidents, the interventions,
that occur unceasingly in the dreariest lives of all, those of the
men who are the most forgetful of their eternal rights. Also must it
be borne in mind that we are not considering the ordinary text-book
psychology—which concerns itself only with such spiritual phenomena
as are the most closely interwoven with the material, having indeed
usurped the beautiful name of Psyche—the psychology of which I speak
is transcendental, and throws light on the direct relationship that
exists between soul and soul, and on the _sensibility_ as well as the
_extraordinary presence_ of the soul. It is a science that is in its
infancy; but by it shall men be taken a full step higher, and very
speedily shall it dismiss for ever the elementary psychology that has
been dominant to this day.

This ‘immediate’ psychology is descending from the mountain tops,
and laying siege to the humblest of valleys; and even in the most
mediocre of writings is its presence to be felt. And indeed, than this,
nothing could prove more clearly that the pressure of the soul has
increased among mankind, and that its mysterious influence is diffusing
itself among the people. But we are now drawing near to things that
are well-nigh unspeakable, and such examples as one can give are
necessarily ordinary and incomplete. The following are elementary
and readily appreciable. In former days, if there was question, for
a moment, of a presentiment, of the strange impression produced by a
chance meeting or a look, of a decision that the unknown side of human
reason had governed, of an intervention, or a force, inexplicable
and yet understood, of the secret laws of sympathy and antipathy, of
elective and instinctive affinities, of the overwhelming influence of
the thing that had not been spoken—in former days, these problems
would have been carelessly passed by, and, besides, it was but seldom
that they intruded themselves upon the serenity of the thinker. They
seemed to come about by the merest chance. That they are ever pressing
upon life, unceasingly and with prodigious force—this was unsuspected
of all—and the philosopher hastened back to familiar studies of
passion, and of incident that floated on the surface.

These spiritual phenomena, to which, in bygone days, even the greatest
and wisest of our brothers scarcely gave a thought, are to-day being
earnestly studied by the very smallest; and herein are we shown
once again that the human soul is a plant of matchless unity, whose
branches, when the hour is come, all burst into blossom together. The
peasant, to whom the power of expressing that which lies in his soul
should suddenly be given, would at this moment pour forth ideas that
were not yet in the soul of Racine. And thus it is that men of a genius
much inferior to that of Shakespeare or Racine have yet had revealed to
them glimpses of a secretly luminous life, whose outer crust, alone,
had come within the ken of those masters. For, however great the soul,
it avails not that it should wander in isolation through space or time.
Unaided, it can do but little. It is the flower of the multitude. When
the spiritual sea is storm-tossed, and its whole surface restless and
troubled, then is the moment ripe for the mighty soul to appear; but if
it come at time of slumber, its utterance will be but of the dreams of
sleep. Hamlet—to take the most illustrious of all examples—Hamlet,
at Elsinore—at every moment does he advance to the very brink of
awakening; and yet, though his haggard face be damp with icy sweat,
there are words that he cannot utter, words that to-day would doubtless
flow readily from his lips, because the soul of the passer-by, be he
tramp or thief, would be there to help him. For, in truth, it would
seem that already there are fewer veils that enwrap the soul; and were
Hamlet now to look into the eyes of his mother, or of Claudius, there
would be revealed to him the things that, then, he did not know. Is it
thoroughly clear to you—this is one of the strangest, most disquieting
of truths—is it thoroughly clear to you that, if there be evil in
your heart, your mere presence will probably proclaim it to-day a
hundred times more clearly than would have been the case two or three
centuries ago? Is it fully borne home to you that if you have perchance
this morning done anything that shall have brought sadness to a single
human being, the peasant, with whom you are about to talk of the rain
or the storm, will know of it—his soul will have been warned even
before his hand has thrown open the door? Though you assume the face
of a saint, a hero or a martyr, the eye of the passing child will not
greet you with the same unapproachable smile if there lurk within you
an evil thought, an injustice, or a brother’s tears. A hundred years
ago the soul of that child would perhaps have passed, unheeding, by the
side of yours....

Truly it is becoming difficult to cherish hatred, envy, or treachery
in one’s heart, secure from observation; for the souls even of the most
indifferent are incessantly keeping vigil around us. Our ancestors have
not spoken of these things, and we realise that the life in which we
bestir ourselves is quite other than that which they have depicted.
Have they deceived us, or did they not know? Signs and words no longer
count for anything, and in mystic circles it is the mere presence that
decides almost all.

Even the ancient ‘will-power’—the logical will-power that men have
professed to understand so well—even this is being transformed in
its turn, and moulded beneath the pressure of mighty, deep searching,
inexplicable laws. The last refuges are disappearing, and men are
drawing closer to each other. Far above words and acts do they judge
their fellows—nay, far above thought—for that which they see, though
they understand it not, lies well beyond the domain of thought. And
this is one of the great signs by which the spiritual periods I spoke
of before shall be known. It is felt on all sides that the conditions
of work-a-day life are changing, and the youngest of us already differ
entirely in speech and action from the men of the preceding generation.
A mass of useless conventions, habits, pretences, and intermediaries
are being swept into the gulf; and it is by the invisible alone
that, though we know it not, nearly all of us judge each other. If I
enter your room for the first time you will not pronounce the secret
sentence that, according to the laws of practical psychology, each
man pronounces in the presence of his fellow. In vain shall you try
to tell me whither you have been to learn who I am, but you shall
come back to me, bearing the weight of unspeakable certitudes. Your
father, perhaps, would have judged me otherwise, and would have been
mistaken. We can but believe that man will soon touch man, and that the
atmosphere will change. ‘Have we,’ asks Claude de Saint-Martin, the
great ‘unknown philosopher,’ ‘have we advanced one step further on the
radiant path of enlightenment, that leads to the simplicity of men?’
Let us wait in silence: perhaps ere long we shall be conscious of ‘the
murmur of the gods.’




THE PRE-DESTINED




THE PRE-DESTINED


THEY are known to most men, and there are few mothers who have not seen
them. Perhaps they are as inevitable as life’s sorrows; and the men
among whom they dwell become the better for the knowledge of them, and
the sadder, and the more gentle.

They are strange. As children, life seems nearer to them than to other
children; they appear to suspect nothing, and yet is there in their
eyes so profound a certainty that we feel they must know all, that
there must have been evenings when they found time to tell themselves
their secret. At the moment when their brothers are still groping
their way blindly in the mysterious land between birth and life, they
have already understood; they are erect, ready with hand and soul. In
all haste, but wisely and with minute care, do they prepare themselves
to live; and this very haste is a sign upon which mothers, the
discreet, unsuspected confidants of all that cannot be told, can scarce
bring themselves to look.

Their stay among us is often so short that we are unconscious of their
presence; they go away without saying a word, and are for ever unknown
to us. But others there are who linger for a moment, who look at us
with an eager smile, and seem to be on the point of confessing that
they know all; and then, towards their twentieth year, they leave us,
hurriedly, muffling their footsteps, as though they had just discovered
that they had chosen the wrong dwelling-place, and had been about to
pass their lives among men whom they did not know.

They themselves say but little, and there is a cloud that falls around
them at the moment when men seem on the point of touching them, or
when hurt has been done them. Some days there are when they seem to
be of us, and among us, but a sudden evening comes and they are so
far away that we dare not look at them, or ask a question. It is as
though they were on life’s further shore, and the feeling rushes in
upon us that now, at last, the hour has come for affirming that which
is graver, deeper, more human, more real than friendship, pity or love;
for saying the thing that is piteously flapping its wings at the back
of our throat, and craving for utterance—the thing that our ignorance
crushes, that we never have said, that we never shall say, for so many
lives are spent in silence! And time rushes on; and who is there of us
but has lingered and waited till it was too late, and there was no one
to listen to his words?

Why have they come to us—why do they go so soon? Is it only that we
may be convinced of the utter aimlessness of life? It is a mystery that
ever eludes us, and all our searchings are vain. I have often seen
these things happen; one day they were so near to me that I scarcely
knew was it myself or another whom they concerned....

For it was thus that my brother died. And though he alone had heard the
warning whisper, be it ever so unconsciously—for from his earliest
days he had concealed the message of disease within him—yet surely
had the knowledge of what was to come been borne in upon us also. What
are the signs that set apart the creatures for whom dire events lie in
wait? Nothing is visible, and yet all is revealed. They are afraid of
us, for that we are ever crying out to them of our knowledge, struggle
against it as we may; and when we are with them, they can see that,
in our hearts, we are oppressed by their destiny. Something there is
that we hide from most men, and we ourselves are ignorant of what
this thing may be. Strange secrets of life and death pass between two
creatures who meet for the first time; and many other secrets besides,
nameless to this day, but which at once thrust their impress upon our
bearing, our features, the look of our eyes; and even while we press
the hand of our friend, our soul will have soared perhaps beyond the
confines of this life. It may be that when two men are together, they
are unconscious of any hidden thoughts, but there are things that lie
deeper, and are far more imperious, than thought. We are not the lords
of these unfathomable gifts; and we are ever betraying the presence of
the prophet to whom speech is not given. We are never the same with
others as when we are alone; we are different, even, when we are in
the dark with them, and the look in our eyes changes as the past or
future flashes before us; and therefore it is that, though we know it
not, we are ever watchful and on our guard. When we meet those who are
not to live long, we are only conscious of the fate that is hanging
over them; we see nothing else. If they could they would deceive us,
so that they might the more readily deceive themselves. They do all in
their power to mislead us; they imagine that their eager smile, their
burning interest in life, will conceal the truth; but none the less
does the event already loom large before us, and seem indeed to be the
mainstay, nay, the very reason of their existence. Death has again
betrayed them, and they realise, in bitter sadness, that nothing is
hidden from us, that there are certain voices that cannot be still.

Who can tell us of the power which events possess—whether they issue
from us, or whether we owe our being to them? Do we attract them, or
are we attracted by them? Do we mould them, or do they mould us? Are
they always unerring in their course? Why do they come to us like the
bee to the hive, like the dove to the cote; and where do they find a
resting-place when we are not there to meet them? Whence is it that
they come to us; and why are they shaped in our image, as though they
were our brothers? Are their workings in the past or in the future; and
are the more powerful of them those that are no longer, or those that
are not yet? Is it to-day or to-morrow that moulds us? Do we not all
spend the greater part of our lives under the shadow of an event that
has not yet come to pass? I have noticed the same grave gestures, the
footsteps that seemed to tend towards a goal that was all too near,
the presentiments that chilled the blood, the fixed, immovable look—I
have noticed all these in the men, even, whose end was to come about
by accident, the men on whom death would suddenly seize from without.
And yet were they as eager as their brethren, who bore the seeds of
death within them. Their faces were the same. To them, too, life was
fraught with more seriousness than to those who were to live their full
span. The same careful, silent watchfulness marked their actions. They
had no time to lose; they had to be in readiness at the same hour; so
completely had this event, which no prophet could have foretold, become
the very life of their life.

It is death that is the guide of our life, and our life has no goal but
death. Our death is the mould into which our life flows: it is death
that has shaped our features. Of the dead alone should portraits be
painted, for it is only they who are truly themselves, and who, for
one instant, stand revealed even as they are. What life is there but
becomes radiant when the pure, cold, simple light falls on it at the
last hour? It is, perhaps, the same light that floats around children’s
faces when they smile at us; and the silence that steals over us then
is akin to that of the chamber where there will be peace for evermore.
I have known many whom the same death was leading by the hand, and when
my memory dwells upon them I see a band of children, of youths and
maidens, who seem to be all coming forth from the same house. A strange
fraternity already unites them: it may be that they recognise each
other by birth-marks we cannot discover, that they furtively exchange
solemn signals of silence. They are the eager children of precocious
death. At school we were vaguely conscious of them. They seemed to be
at the same time seeking and avoiding each other, like people who are
afflicted with the same infirmity. They were to be seen together, in
remote corners of the garden, under the trees. Their mysterious smile
flew fitfully across their lips, and there lurked a gravity beneath, a
curious fear lest a secret should escape. Silence would almost always
fall upon them, when those who were to live drew near. Were they
already speaking of the event, or did they know that the event was
speaking through them, and in their despite? Were they forming a circle
round it, and trying to keep it hidden from indifferent eyes? There
were times when they seemed to be looking down upon us from a lofty
tower; and, for all that we were the stronger, we dared not molest
them. For truly there is nothing that can ever be really hidden; and
whosoever meets me knows all that I have done and shall do, all that I
have thought and do think—nay, he knows the very day on which I shall
die; but the means of telling what he knows is not given to him, though
he speak never so softly, and whisper to his heart. We pass heedlessly
by the side of all that our hands cannot touch; and perhaps too great
a knowledge would be ours if all that we do know were revealed to us.
Our real life is not the life we live, and we feel that our deepest,
nay, our most intimate thoughts are quite apart from ourselves, for we
are other than our thoughts and our dreams. And it is only at special
moments—it may be by merest accident—that we live our own life. Will
the day ever dawn when we shall be what we are?... In the meanwhile, we
felt that they were strangers in our midst. A sensation of awe crept
into our life. Sometimes they would walk with us along the corridor,
or in the courtyard, and we could scarcely keep pace with them.
Sometimes they would join us at our games, and the game would no longer
be the same. There were some who could not find their brethren. They
would wander in solitude in our midst, while we played and shouted:
they had no friends among those who were not about to die. And yet we
loved them, and the deepest friendliness shone from their eyes. What
was there that divided us from them? What is there that divides us
all? What is this sea of mysteries in whose depths we have our being?
The love that we felt was the love that seeks not to express itself,
because it is not of this world. It is a love, perhaps, that cannot
be put to the proof; it may seem feeble, uncertain, and the smallest,
most ordinary friendship may appear to triumph over it—but none
the less does its life lie deeper than our life, and none the less,
notwithstanding its seeming indifference, is it reserved for a time
when doubt and uncertainty shall be no longer....

Its voice does not make itself heard now because its moment for
speaking has not yet come; and it is never those whom we enfold in our
arms that we love the most deeply. For there is a side of life—and it
is the best, the purest, the noblest side—which never blends with the
ordinary life, and the eyes even of lovers themselves can seldom pierce
through the masonry that is built up of silence and love....

Or was it that we avoided them, because, though younger than ourselves,
they still were our elders?... Did we know that they were not of our
age, and did we fear them, as though they were sitting in judgment
upon us? A curious steadfastness already lurked in their eyes; and if,
in our moments of agitation, their glance rested upon us, it would
soothe and comfort us, we knew not why, and there would be an instant
of strangest silence. We would turn round: they were watching us and
smiling gravely. There were two for whom a violent death was lying in
wait—I remember their faces well. But almost all were timid, and tried
to pass by unperceived. They were weighed down by some deadly sense of
shame, they seemed to be ever beseeching forgiveness for a fault they
knew not of, but which was near at hand. They came towards us and our
eyes met; we drew asunder, silently, and all was clear to us, though we
knew nothing.




MYSTIC MORALITY




MYSTIC MORALITY


IT is only too evident that the invisible agitations of the kingdoms
within us are arbitrarily set on foot by the thoughts we shelter. Our
myriad intuitions are the veiled queens who steer our course through
life, though we have no words in which to speak of them. How strangely
do we diminish a thing as soon as we try to express it in words! We
believe we have dived down to the most unfathomable depths, and when
we reappear on the surface, the drop of water that glistens on our
trembling finger-tips no longer resembles the sea from which it came.
We believe we have discovered a grotto that is stored with bewildering
treasure; we come back to the light of day, and the gems we have
brought are false—mere pieces of glass—and yet does the treasure
shine on, unceasingly, in the darkness! There is something between
ourselves and our soul that nothing can penetrate; and there are
moments, says Emerson, ‘in which we court suffering, in the hope that
here at least we shall find reality, sharp peaks and edges of truth.’

I have said elsewhere that the souls of mankind seemed to be drawing
nearer to each other, and even if this be not a statement that can be
proved, it is none the less based upon deep-rooted, though obscure,
convictions. It is indeed difficult to advance facts in its support,
for facts are nothing but the laggards, the spies and camp followers
of the great forces we cannot see. But surely there are moments when
we seem to feel, more deeply than did our fathers before us, that we
are not in the presence of ourselves alone. Neither those who believe
in a God, nor those who disbelieve, are found to act in themselves as
though they were sure of being alone. We are watched, we are under
strictest supervision, and it comes from elsewhere than the indulgent
darknesses of each man’s conscience! Perhaps the spiritual vases are
less closely sealed now than in bygone days, perhaps more power has
come to the waves of the sea within us? I know not: all that we can
state with certainty is that we no longer attach the same importance to
a certain number of traditional faults, but this is in itself a token
of a spiritual victory.

It would seem as though our code of morality were changing—advancing
with timid steps towards loftier regions that cannot yet be seen. And
the moment has perhaps come when certain new questions should be
asked. What would happen, let us say, if our soul were suddenly to
take visible shape, and were compelled to advance into the midst of
her assembled sisters, stripped of all her veils, but laden with her
most secret thoughts, and dragging behind her the most mysterious,
inexplicable acts of her life? Of what would she be ashamed? Which are
the things she fain would hide? Would she, like a bashful maiden, cloak
beneath her long hair the numberless sins of the flesh? She knows not
of them, and those sins have never come near her. They were committed
a thousand miles from her throne; and the soul even of the prostitute
would pass unsuspectingly through the crowd, with the transparent smile
of the child in her eyes. She has not interfered, she was living her
life where the light fell on her, and it is this life only that she can
recall.

Are there any sins or crimes of which she could be guilty? Has she
betrayed, deceived, lied? Has she inflicted suffering or been the cause
of tears? Where was she while this man delivered over his brother to
the enemy? Perhaps, far away from him, she was sobbing; and from that
moment she will have become more beautiful and more profound. She will
feel no shame for that which she has not done; she can remain pure in
the midst of terrible murder. Often, she will transform into inner
radiance all the evil wrought before her. These things are governed
by an invisible principle; and hence, doubtless, has arisen the
inexplicable indulgence of the gods.

And our indulgence, too. Strive as we may, we are bound to pardon;
and when death, ‘the great Conciliator,’ has passed by, is there one
of us who does not fall on his knees and silently, with every token
of forgiveness, bend over the departing soul? When I stand before
the rigid body of my bitterest enemy: when I look upon the pale lips
that slandered me, the sightless eyes that so often brought the tears
to mine, the cold hands that may have wrought me so much wrong—do
you imagine that I can still think of revenge? Death has come and
atoned for all. I have no grievance against the soul of the man
before me. Instinctively do I recognise that it soars high above the
gravest faults and the cruellest wrongs (and how admirable and full of
significance is this instinct!). If there linger still a regret within
me, it is not that I am unable to inflict suffering in my turn, but it
is perhaps that my love was not great enough and that my forgiveness
has come too late....

One might almost believe that these things were already understood
by us, deep down in our soul. We do not judge our fellows by their
acts—nay, not even by their most secret thoughts; for these are not
always undiscernible, and we go far beyond the undiscernible. A man
shall have committed crimes reputed to be the vilest of all, and yet
it may be that even the blackest of these shall not have tarnished,
for one single moment, the breath of fragrance and ethereal purity
that surrounds his presence; while at the approach of a philosopher
or martyr our soul may be steeped in unendurable gloom. It may happen
that a saint or hero shall choose his friend from among men whose
faces bear the stamp of every degraded thought; and that, by the side
of others, whose brows are radiant with lofty and magnanimous dreams,
he shall not feel a ‘human and brotherly atmosphere’ about him. What
tidings do these things bring us? And wherein lies their significance?
Are there laws deeper than those by which deeds and thoughts are
governed? What are the things we have learned and why do we always
act in accordance with rules that none ever mention, but which are
the only rules that cannot err? For it may be boldly declared that,
appearances notwithstanding, neither hero nor saint has chosen wrongly.
They have but obeyed, and even though the saint be deceived and sold
by the man he has preferred, still will there abide with him something
imperishable, something by which he shall know that he was right and
that he has nothing to regret. The soul will ever remember that the
other soul was pure....

When we venture to move the mysterious stone that covers these
mysteries, the heavily charged air surges up from the gulf, and words
and thoughts fall around us like poisoned flies. Even our inner life
seems trivial by the side of these unchanging deepnesses. When the
angels stand before you, will you glory in never having sinned; and is
there not an inferior innocence? When Jesus read the wretched thoughts
of the Pharisees who surrounded the paralytic of Capernaum, are you
sure that as He looked at them, He judged their soul—and condemned
it—without beholding, far away behind their thoughts, a brightness
that was perhaps everlasting? And would He be a God if His condemnation
were irrevocable? But why does He speak as though He lingered on the
threshold? Will the basest thought or the noblest inspiration leave a
mark on the diamond’s surface? What god, that is indeed on the heights,
but must smile at our gravest faults, as we smile at the puppies on the
hearthrug? And what god would he be who would not smile? If you become
truly pure, do you think you will try to conceal the petty motives of
your great actions from the eyes of the angels before you? And yet are
there not in us many things that will look pitiful indeed before the
gods assembled on the mountain? Surely that must be, and our soul knows
full well that it will have to render its account. It lives in silence,
and the hand of a great judge is ever upon it, though his sentences are
beyond our ken. What accounts will it have to render? Where shall we
find the code of morality that can enlighten us? Is there a mysterious
morality that holds sway in regions far beyond our thoughts? Are our
most secret desires only the helpless satellites of a central star,
that is hidden from our eyes? Does a transparent tree exist within us,
and are all our actions and all our virtues only its ephemeral flowers
and leaves? Indeed we know not what are the wrongs that our soul can
commit, nor what there can be that should make us blush before a higher
intelligence or before another soul; and yet which of us feels that he
is pure and does not dread the coming of the judge? And where is there
a soul that is not afraid of another soul?

       *       *       *       *       *

Here, we are no longer in the well-known valleys of human and psychic
life. We find ourselves at the door of the third enclosure: that of the
divine life of the mystics. We have to grope timidly, and make sure of
every footstep, as we cross the threshold. And even when the threshold
is crossed, where shall certainty be found? Where shall we discover
those marvellous laws that we are perhaps constantly disobeying: laws
of whose existence our conscience is ignorant, though our soul has been
warned? Whence comes the shadow of a mysterious transgression that at
times creeps over our life and makes it so hard to bear? What are the
great spiritual sins of which we can be guilty? Will it be our shame
to have striven against our soul, or is there an invisible struggle
between our soul and God? And is this struggle so strangely silent that
not even a whisper floats on the air? Is there a moment when we can
hear the queen whose lips are sealed? She is sternly silent when events
do but float on the surface; but there are others perhaps that we
scarcely heed, which have their roots deep down in eternity. Some one
is dying, some one looks at you, or cries, some other is coming towards
you for the first time, or an enemy is passing by—may she not perhaps
whisper then? And if you listened to her, while already you no longer
love, in the future, the friend at whom you now are smiling? But all
this is nothing, and is not even near to the outer lights of the abyss.
One cannot speak of these things—the solitude is too great. ‘In
truth,’ says Novalis, ‘it is only here and there that the soul bestirs
itself; when will it move as a whole, and when will humanity begin to
feel with one conscience?’ It is only when this takes place that some
will learn. We must wait in patience till this superior conscience be
gradually, slowly, formed. Then perhaps some one will come to whom it
will be given to express what it is that we all feel as regards this
side of the soul, which is like to the face of the moon, that none have
perceived since the world began.




ON WOMEN




ON WOMEN


IN these domains also are the laws unknown. Far above our heads, in the
very centre of the sky, shines the star of our destined love; and it is
in the atmosphere of that star, and illumined by its rays, that every
passion that stirs us will come to life, even to the end. And though we
choose to right or to left of us, on the heights or in the shallows;
though, in our struggle to break through the enchanted circle that is
drawn around all the acts of our life, we do violence to the instinct
that moves us, and try our hardest to choose against the choice of
destiny, yet shall the woman we elect always have come to us straight
from the unvarying star. And if, like Don Juan, we take a thousand and
three to our embraces, still shall we find, on that evening when arms
fall asunder and lips disunite, that it is always the same woman, good
or bad, tender or cruel, loving or faithless, that is standing before
us.

For indeed we can never emerge from the little circle of light that
destiny traces about our footsteps; and one might almost believe that
the extent and the hue of this impassable ring are known even to the
men who are furthest from us. It is the tinge of its spiritual rays
that they perceive first of all, and therefore will it come about that
they will either smilingly hold out their hand to us or draw it back in
fear. A superior atmosphere exists, in which we all know each other;
and there is a mysterious truth—deeper far than the material truth—to
which we at once have recourse, when we try to form a conception of a
stranger. Have we not all experienced these things, which take place
in the impenetrable regions of almost astral humanity? If you receive
a letter that has come to you from some far-away island lost in the
heart of the ocean, from a stranger whose very existence was unknown to
you, are you quite sure that it is really a stranger who has written
to you? And, as you read, do not certain deep-rooted, infallible
convictions—to which ordinary convictions are as nothing—come to you
concerning this soul that is thus meeting yours, in spheres known to
the gods alone? And, further, can you not understand that this soul,
that was dreaming of yours, heedless of time or space, that this soul,
too, had certitudes akin to your own? Strangest recognitions take
place on all sides, and we cannot hide our existence. Perhaps nothing
brings into broader daylight the subtle bonds that interconnect all
mankind than the little mysteries which attend the exchange of a few
letters between two strangers. This is perhaps one of the minute
crevices—wretchedly insignificant, no doubt, but so few there are
that the faintest glimmer of light must content us—this is perhaps
one of the minute crevices in the door of darkness, through which we
are allowed to peer for one instant, and so conceive to ourselves what
must be taking place in the grotto of treasures, undiscovered to this
day. Look through the passive correspondence of any man, and you shall
find in it an astonishing unity. I know neither of the two men who have
written to me this morning, yet am I already aware that my reply to
the one will differ in its essence from my reply to the other. I have
caught a glimpse of the invisible. And, in my turn, when some one,
whom I have never seen, writes to me, I know quite well that had he
been writing to the friend who is now before me, his letter had not
been exactly the same. A difference will there always be—but it is
spiritual and intangible. It is the invisible signal of the soul that
salutes its fellow. Doubtless must there be regions outside our ken
where none are unknown; a common fatherland whither we may go and meet
each other, and whence the return knows no hardship.

And it is in this common fatherland also that we chose the women we
loved, wherefore it is that we cannot have erred, nor can they have
erred either. The kingdom of love is, before all else, the great
kingdom of certitude, for it is within its bounds that the soul is
possessed of the utmost leisure. There, truly, they have naught to do
but to recognise each other, offer deepest admiration, and ask their
questions—tearfully, like the maid who has found the sister she had
lost—while, far away from them, arm links itself in arm and breaths
are mingling.... At last has a moment come when they can smile and
live their own life—for a truce has been called in the stern routine
of daily existence—and it is perhaps from the heights of this smile
and these ineffable glances that springs the mysterious perfume that
pervades love’s dreariest moments, that preserves for ever the memory
of the time when the lips first met....

Of the true, pre-destined love alone, do I speak here. When Fate
sends forth the woman it has chosen for us—sends her forth from
the fastnesses of the great spiritual cities in which we, all
unconsciously, dwell, and she awaits us at the crossing of the road
we have to traverse when the hour is come—we are warned at the first
glance. Some there are who attempt to force the hand of Fate. Wildly
pressing down their eyelids, so as not to see that which had to be
seen—struggling with all their puny strength against the eternal
forces—they will contrive perhaps to cross the road and go towards
another, sent thither but not for them. But, strive as they may, they
will not succeed in ‘stirring up the dead waters that lie in the great
tarn of the future.’ Nothing will happen; the pure force will not
descend from the heights, and those wasted hours and kisses will never
become part of the real hours and kisses of their life....

There are times when destiny shuts her eyes, but she knows full well
that, when evening falls, we shall return to her, and that the last
word must be hers. She may shut her eyes, but the time till she re-open
them is time that is lost....

It would seem that women are more largely swayed by destiny than
ourselves. They submit to its decrees with far more simplicity; nor is
there sincerity in the resistance they offer. They are still nearer to
God, and yield themselves with less reserve to the pure workings of
the mystery. And therefore is it, doubtless, that all the incidents in
our life in which they take part seem to bring us nearer to what might
almost be the very fountain-head of destiny. It is above all when by
their side that moments come, unexpectedly, when a ‘clear presentiment’
flashes across us, a presentiment of a life that does not always seem
parallel to the life we know of. They lead us close to the gates of
our being. May it not be during one of those profound moments, when
his head is pillowed on a woman’s breast, that the hero learns to know
the strength and steadfastness of his star? And indeed will any true
sentiment of the future ever come to the man who has not had his
resting-place in a woman’s heart?

Yet again do we enter the troubled circles of the higher conscience.
Ah! how true it is that, here, too, ‘the so-called psychology is a
hobgoblin that has usurped, in the sanctuary itself, the place reserved
for the veritable images of the gods.’ For it is not the surface that
always concerns us—nay, nor is it even the deepest of hidden thoughts.
Do you imagine that love knows only of thoughts, and acts, and words,
and that the soul never emerges from its dungeon? Do I need to be told
whether she whom I take in my arms to-day is jealous or faithful, gay
or sad, sincere or treacherous? Do you think that these wretched words
can attain the heights whereon our souls repose and where our destiny
fulfils itself in silence? What care I whether she speak of rain or
jewels, of pins or feathers; what care I though she appear not to
understand? Do you think that it is for a sublime word I thirst when I
feel that a soul is gazing into my soul? Do I not know that the most
beautiful of thoughts dare not raise their heads when the mysteries
confront them? I am ever standing at the sea-shore; and, were I Plato,
Pascal, or Michael Angelo, and the woman I loved merely telling me of
her earrings, the words I would say and the words she would say would
appear but the same as they floated on the waves of the fathomless
inner sea, that each of us would be contemplating in the other. Let
but my very loftiest thought be weighed in the scale of life or love,
it will not turn the balance against the three little words that the
maid who loves me shall have whispered of her silver bangles, her pearl
necklace, or her trinkets of glass....

It is we who do not understand, for that we never rise above the
earth-level of our intellect. Let us but ascend to the first snows of
the mountain, and all inequalities are levelled by the purifying hand
of the horizon that opens before us. What difference then between a
pronouncement of Marcus Aurelius and the words of the child complaining
of the cold? Let us be humble, and learn to distinguish between
accident and essence. Let not ‘sticks that float’ cause us to forget
the prodigies of the gulf. The most glorious thoughts and the most
degraded ideas can no more ruffle the eternal surface of our soul than,
amidst the stars of Heaven, Himalaya or precipice can alter the surface
of the earth. A look, a kiss, and the certainty of a great invisible
presence: all is said; and I know that she who is by my side is my
equal....

But truly this equal is admirable, and strange; and, when love comes
to her, even the lowest of wantons possesses that which we never have,
inasmuch as, in her thoughts, love is always eternal. Therefore it
is, perhaps, that, besides their primitive instincts, all women have
communications with the unknown that are denied to us. Great is the
distance that separates the best of men from the treasures of the
second boundary; and, when a solemn moment of life demands a jewel
from this treasure, they no longer remember the paths that thither
lead, and vainly offer to the imperious, undeceivable circumstance
the false trinkets that their intellect has fashioned. But the woman
never forgets the path that leads to the centre of her being; and no
matter whether I find her in opulence or in poverty, in ignorance or in
fulness of knowledge, in shame or in glory, do I but whisper one word
that has truly come forth from the virgin depths of my soul, she will
retrace her footsteps along the mysterious paths that she has never
forgotten, and without a moment’s hesitation will she bring back to
me, from out her inexhaustible stores of love, a word, a look, or a
gesture that shall be no less pure than my own. It is as though her
soul were ever within call; for by day and night is she prepared to
give answer to the loftiest appeals from another soul; and the ransom
of the poorest is undistinguishable from the ransom of a queen....

With reverence must we draw near to them, be they lowly or arrogant,
inattentive or lost in dreams, be they smiling still or plunged in
tears; for they know the things that we do not know, and have a lamp
that we have lost. Their abiding-place is at the foot itself of the
Inevitable, whose well-worn paths are visible to them more clearly
than to us. And thence it is that their strange intuitions have come
to them, their gravity at which we wonder; and we feel that, even in
their most trifling actions, they are conscious of being upheld by the
strong, unerring hands of the gods. I said before that they drew us
nearer to the gates of our being: verily might we believe, when we are
with them, that that primeval gate is opening, amidst the bewildering
whisper that doubtless waited on the birth of things, then when speech
was yet hushed, for fear lest command or forbidding should issue forth,
unheard....

She will never cross the threshold of that gate; and she awaits us
within, where are the fountain-heads. And when we come and knock from
without, and she opens to our bidding, her hand will still keep hold of
latch and key. She will look, for one instant, at the man who has been
sent to her, and in that brief moment she has learned all that had to
be learned, and the years to come have trembled to the end of time....
Who shall tell us of what consists the first look of love, ‘that magic
wand made of a ray of broken light,’ the ray that has issued forth
from the eternal home of our being, that has transformed two souls,
and given them twenty centuries of youth? The door may open again,
or close; pay no heed, nor make further effort, for all is decided.
She knows. She will no longer concern herself with the things you do,
or say, or even think; and if she notice them, it will be but with a
smile, and unconsciously will she fling from her all that does not
help to confirm the certitudes of that first glance. And if you think
you have deceived her, and that her impression is wrong, be sure that
it is she who is right, and you yourself who are mistaken; for you
are more truly that which you are in her eyes than that which in your
soul you believe yourself to be, and this even though she may forever
misinterpret the meaning of a gesture, a smile or a tear....

Hidden treasures that have not even a name!... I would that all those
who have suffered at women’s hands, and found them evil, would loudly
proclaim it, and give us their reasons; and if those reasons be well
founded we shall be indeed surprised, and shall have advanced far
forward in the mystery. For women are indeed the veiled sisters of all
the great things we do not see. They are indeed nearest of kin to the
infinite that is about us, and they alone can still smile at it with
the intimate grace of the child, to whom its father inspires no fear.
It is they who preserve here below the pure fragrance of our soul,
like some jewel from Heaven, which none know how to use; and were they
to depart, the spirit would reign in solitude in a desert. Theirs are
still the divine emotions of the first days; and the sources of their
being lie, deeper far than ours, in all that was illimitable. Those
who complain of them know not the heights whereon the true kisses are
to be found, and verily do I pity them. And yet, how insignificant do
women seem when we look at them as we pass by! We see them moving about
in their little homes; this one is bending forward, down there another
is sobbing, a third sings and the last sews; and there is not one of us
who understands.... We visit them, as one visits pleasant things; we
approach them with caution and suspicion, and it is scarcely possible
for the soul to enter. We question them, mistrustfully—they, who
know already, answer naught, and we go away, shrugging our shoulders,
convinced that they do not understand.... ‘But what need for them to
understand,’ answers the poet, who is always right, ‘what need for them
to understand, those thrice happy ones who have chosen the better part,
and who, even as a pure flame of love in this earth of ours, token of
the celestial fire that irradiates all things, shine forth only from
the pinnacles of temples and the mastheads of ships that wander? Some
of Nature’s strangest secrets are often revealed, at sacred moments,
to these maidens who love, and ingenuously and unconsciously will they
declare them. The sage follows in their footsteps to gather up the
jewels, that in their innocence and joy they scatter along the path.
The poet, who feels what they feel, offers homage to their love, and
tries, in his songs, to transplant that love, that is the germ of the
age of gold, to other times and other countries.’ For what has been
said of the mystics applies above all to women, since it is they who
have preserved the sense of the mystic in our earth to this day....




THE TRAGICAL IN DAILY LIFE




THE TRAGICAL IN DAILY LIFE


THERE is a tragic element in the life of every day that is far more
real, far more penetrating, far more akin to the true self that is
in us than the tragedy that lies in great adventure. But, readily
as we all may feel this, to prove it is by no means easy, inasmuch
as this essential tragic element comprises more than that which is
merely material or merely psychological. It goes beyond the determined
struggle of man against man, and desire against desire: it goes beyond
the eternal conflict of duty and passion. Its province is rather to
reveal to us how truly wonderful is the mere act of living, and to
throw light upon the existence of the soul, self-contained in the
midst of ever-restless immensities; to hush the discourse of reason
and sentiment, so that above the tumult may be heard the solemn,
uninterrupted whisperings of man and his destiny. It is its province
to point out to us the uncertain, dolorous footsteps of the being, as
he approaches, or wanders from, his truth, his beauty, or his God.
And further, to show us, and make us understand, the countless other
things therewith connected, of which tragic poets have but vouchsafed
us passing glimpses. And here do we come to an essential point, for
could not these things, of which we have had only passing glimpses,
be placed in front of the others, and shown to us first of all? The
mysterious chant of the Infinite, the ominous silence of the soul and
of God, the murmur of Eternity on the horizon, the destiny or fatality
that we are conscious of within us, though by what tokens none can
tell—do not all these underlie King Lear, Macbeth, Hamlet? And would
it not be possible, by some interchanging of the rôles, to bring them
nearer to us, and send the actors farther off? Is it beyond the mark to
say that the true tragic element, normal, deep-rooted, and universal,
that the true tragic element of life only begins at the moment when
so-called adventures, sorrows, and dangers have disappeared? Is the
arm of happiness not longer than that of sorrow, and do not certain of
its attributes draw nearer to the soul? Must we indeed roar like the
Atrides, before the Eternal God will reveal Himself in our life? and
is He never by our side at times when the air is calm, and the lamp
burns on, unflickering? When we think of it, is it not the tranquillity
that is terrible, the tranquillity watched by the stars? and is it in
tumult or in silence that the spirit of life quickens within us? Is
it not when we are told, at the end of the story, ‘They were happy,’
that the great disquiet should intrude itself? What is taking place
while they are happy? Are there not elements of deeper gravity and
stability in happiness, in a single moment of repose, than in the
whirlwind of passion? Is it not then that we at last behold the march
of time—ay, and of many another on-stealing besides, more secret
still—is it not then that the hours rush forward? Are not deeper
chords set vibrating by all these things than by the dagger-stroke of
conventional drama? Is it not at the very moment when a man believes
himself secure from bodily death that the strange and silent tragedy
of the being and the immensities does indeed raise its curtain on
the stage? Is it while I flee before a naked sword that my existence
touches its most interesting point? Is life always at its sublimest in
a kiss? Are there not other moments, when one hears purer voices that
do not fade away so soon? Does the soul only flower on nights of storm?
Hitherto, doubtless, this belief has prevailed. It is only the life of
violence, the life of bygone days, that is perceived by nearly all our
tragic writers; and truly may one say that anachronism dominates the
stage, and that dramatic art dates back as many years as the art of
sculpture. Far different is it with the other arts—with painting and
music, for instance—for these have learned to select and reproduce
those obscurer phases of daily life that are not the less deep-rooted
and amazing. They know that all that life has lost, as regards mere
superficial ornament, has been more than counterbalanced by the depth,
the intimate meaning and the spiritual gravity it has acquired. The
true artist no longer chooses Marius triumphing over the Cimbrians,
or the assassination of the Duke of Guise, as fit subjects for his
art; for he is well aware that the psychology of victory or murder is
but elementary and exceptional, and that the solemn voice of men and
things, the voice that issues forth so timidly and hesitatingly, cannot
be heard amidst the idle uproar of acts of violence. And therefore
will he place on his canvas a house lost in the heart of the country,
an open door at the end of a passage, a face or hands at rest, and by
these simple images will he add to our consciousness of life, which is
a possession that it is no longer possible to lose.

But to the tragic author, as to the mediocre painter who still lingers
over historical pictures, it is only the violence of the anecdote that
appeals, and in his representation thereof does the entire interest of
his work consist. And he imagines, forsooth, that we shall delight in
witnessing the very same acts that brought joy to the hearts of the
barbarians, with whom murder, outrage and treachery were matters of
daily occurrence. Whereas it is far away from bloodshed, battle-cry and
sword-thrust that the lives of most of us flow on, and men’s tears are
silent to-day, and invisible, and almost spiritual....

Indeed, when I go to a theatre, I feel as though I were spending a
few hours with my ancestors, who conceived life as something that was
primitive, arid and brutal; but this conception of theirs scarcely even
lingers in my memory, and surely it is not one that I can share. I am
shown a deceived husband killing his wife, a woman poisoning her lover,
a son avenging his father, a father slaughtering his children, children
putting their father to death, murdered kings, ravished virgins,
imprisoned citizens—in a word, all the sublimity of tradition, but
alas, how superficial and material! Blood, surface-tears and death!
What can I learn from creatures who have but one fixed idea, and who
have no time to live, for that there is a rival, or a mistress, whom it
behoves them to put to death?

I had hoped to be shown some act of life, traced back to its sources
and to its mystery by connecting links, that my daily occupations
afford me neither power nor occasion to study. I had gone thither
hoping that the beauty, the grandeur and the earnestness of my humble
day by day existence would, for one instant, be revealed to me, that I
would be shown the I know not what presence, power or God that is ever
with me in my room. I was yearning for one of the strange moments of a
higher life that flit unperceived through my dreariest hours; whereas,
almost invariably, all that I beheld was but a man who would tell me,
at wearisome length, why he was jealous, why he poisoned, or why he
killed.

I admire Othello, but he does not appear to me to live the august daily
life of a Hamlet, who has the time to live, inasmuch as he does not
act. Othello is admirably jealous. But is it not perhaps an ancient
error to imagine that it is at the moments when this passion, or others
of equal violence, possesses us, that we live our truest lives? I have
grown to believe that an old man, seated in his armchair, waiting
patiently, with his lamp beside him; giving unconscious ear to all
the eternal laws that reign about his house, interpreting, without
comprehending, the silence of doors and windows and the quivering voice
of the light, submitting with bent head to the presence of his soul and
his destiny—an old man, who conceives not that all the powers of this
world, like so many heedful servants, are mingling and keeping vigil
in his room, who suspects not that the very sun itself is supporting
in space the little table against which he leans, or that every star
in heaven and every fibre of the soul are directly concerned in the
movement of an eyelid that closes, or a thought that springs to
birth—I have grown to believe that he, motionless as he is, does yet
live in reality a deeper, more human and more universal life than the
lover who strangles his mistress, the captain who conquers in battle,
or ‘the husband who avenges his honour.’

I shall be told, perhaps, that a motionless life would be invisible,
that therefore animation must be conferred upon it, and movement,
and that such varied movement as would be acceptable is to be found
only in the few passions of which use has hitherto been made. I do
not know whether it be true that a static theatre is impossible.
Indeed, to me it seems to exist already. Most of the tragedies of
Æschylus are tragedies without movement. In both the ‘Prometheus’
and the ‘Suppliants,’ events are lacking; and the entire tragedy of
the ‘Chœphoræ’—surely the most terrible drama of antiquity—does
but cling, nightmare-like, around the tomb of Agamemnon, till murder
darts forth, as a lightning flash, from the accumulation of prayers,
ever falling back upon themselves. Consider, from this point of view,
a few more of the finest tragedies of the ancients: ‘The Eumenides,’
‘Antigone,’ ‘Electra,’ ‘Œdipus at Colonos.’ ‘They have admired,’ said
Racine in his preface to ‘Berenice,’ ‘they have admired the “Ajax”
of Sophocles, wherein there is nothing but Ajax killing himself with
regret for the fury into which he fell after the arms of Achilles were
denied him. They have admired “Philoctetes,” whose entire subject
is but the coming of Ulysses with intent to seize the arrows of
Hercules. Even the “Œdipus,” though full of recognitions, contains less
subject-matter than the simplest tragedy of our days.’

What have we here but life that is almost motionless? In most cases,
indeed, you will find that psychological action—infinitely loftier in
itself than mere material action, and truly, one might think, well-nigh
indispensable—that psychological action even has been suppressed, or
at least vastly diminished, in a truly marvellous fashion, with the
result that the interest centres solely and entirely in the individual,
face to face with the universe. Here we are no longer with the
barbarians, nor is man now fretting, himself in the midst of elementary
passions, as though, forsooth, these were the only things worthy of
note: he is at rest, and we have time to observe him. It is no longer
a violent, exceptional moment of life that passes before our eyes—it
is life itself. Thousands and thousands of laws there are, mightier and
more venerable than those of passion; but, in common with all that is
endowed with resistless force, these laws are silent, and discreet, and
slow-moving; and hence it is only in the twilight that they can be seen
and heard, in the meditation that comes to us at the tranquil moments
of life.

When Ulysses and Neoptolemus come to Philoctetes and demand of him the
arms of Hercules, their action is in itself as simple and ordinary as
that of a man of our day who goes into a house to visit an invalid,
of a traveller who knocks at the door of an inn, or of a mother who,
by the fireside, awaits the return of her child. Sophocles indicates
the character of his heroes by means of the lightest and quickest of
touches. But it may safely be said that the chief interest of the
tragedy does not lie in the struggle we witness between cunning and
loyalty, between love of country, rancour, and headstrong pride. There
is more beyond: for it is man’s loftier existence that is laid bare to
us. The poet adds to ordinary life something, I know not what, which
is the poet’s secret: and there comes to us a sudden revelation of
life in its stupendous grandeur, in its submissiveness to the unknown
powers, in its endless affinities, in its awe-inspiring misery. Let
but the chemist pour a few mysterious drops into a vessel that seems
to contain the purest water, and at once masses of crystals will rise
to the surface, thus revealing to us all that lay in abeyance there
where nothing was visible before to our incomplete eyes. And even thus
is it in ‘Philoctetes’; the primitive psychology of the three leading
characters would seem to be merely the sides of the vessel containing
the clear water; and this itself is our ordinary life, into which the
poet is about to let fall the revelation-bearing drops of his genius....

Indeed, it is not in the actions but in the words that are found the
beauty and greatness of tragedies that are truly beautiful and great;
and this not solely in the words that accompany and explain the action,
for there must perforce be another dialogue besides the one which is
superficially necessary. And indeed the only words that count in the
play are those that at first seemed useless, for it is therein that the
essence lies. Side by side with the necessary dialogue will you almost
always find another dialogue that seems superfluous; but examine it
carefully, and it will be borne home to you that this is the only one
that the soul can listen to profoundly, for here alone is it the soul
that is being addressed. You will see, too, that it is the quality and
the scope of this unnecessary dialogue that determine the quality
and the immeasurable range of the work. Certain it is that, in the
ordinary drama, the indispensable dialogue by no means corresponds to
reality; and it is just those words that are spoken by the side of the
rigid, apparent truth, that constitute the mysterious beauty of the
most beautiful tragedies, inasmuch as these are words that conform to
a deeper truth, and one that lies incomparably nearer to the invisible
soul by which the poem is upheld. One may even affirm that a poem
draws the nearer to beauty and loftier truth in the measure that it
eliminates words that merely explain the action, and substitutes for
them others that reveal, not the so-called ‘soul-state,’ but I know
not what intangible and unceasing striving of the soul towards its own
beauty and truth. And so much the nearer, also, does it draw to the
true life. To every man does it happen, in his work-a-day existence,
that some situation of deep seriousness has to be unravelled by means
of words. Reflect for an instant. At moments such as those—nay, at
the most commonplace of times—is it the thing you say or the reply
you receive that has the most value? Are not other forces, other
words one cannot hear, brought into being, and do not these determine
the event? What I say often counts for so little; but my presence,
the attitude of my soul, my future and my past, that which will take
birth in me and that which is dead, a secret thought, the stars that
approve, my destiny, the thousands of mysteries which surround me and
float about yourself—all this it is that speaks to you at that tragic
moment, all this it is that brings to me your answer. There is all
this beneath every one of my words, and each one of yours; it is this,
above all, that we see, it a this, above all, that we hear, ourselves
notwithstanding. If you have come, you, the ‘outraged husband,’ the
‘deceived lover,’ the ‘forsaken wife,’ intending to kill me, your arm
will not be stayed by my most moving entreaty; but it may be that
there will come towards you, at that moment, one of these unexpected
forces; and my soul, knowing of their vigil near to me, may whisper
a secret word whereby, haply, you shall be disarmed. These are the
spheres wherein adventures come to issue, this is the dialogue whose
echo should be heard. And it is this echo that one does hear—extremely
attenuated and variable, it is true—in some of the great works
mentioned above. But might we not try to draw nearer to the spheres
where it is ‘in reality’ that everything comes to pass?

It would seem as though the endeavour were being made. Some time ago,
when dealing with ‘The Master Builder,’ which is the one of Ibsen’s
dramas wherein this dialogue of the ‘second degree’ attains the deepest
tragedy, I endeavoured, unskilfully enough, to fix its secrets. For
indeed they are kindred handmarks traced on the same wall by the same
sightless being, groping for the same light. ‘What is it,’ I asked,
‘what is it that, in the “Master Builder,” the poet has added to life,
thereby making it appear so strange, so profound and so disquieting
beneath its trivial surface?’ The discovery is not easy, and the old
master hides from us more than one secret. It would even seem as though
what he has wished to say were but little by the side of what he has
been compelled to say. He has freed certain powers of the soul that
have never yet been free, and it may well be that these have held him
in thrall. ‘Look you, Hilda,’ exclaims Solness, ‘look you! There is
sorcery in you, too, as there is in me. It is this sorcery that imposes
action on the powers of the beyond. And we _have_ to yield to it.
Whether we want to or not, we _must_.’

There is sorcery in them, as in us all. Hilda and Solness are, I
believe, the first characters in drama who feel, for an instant, that
they are living in the atmosphere of the soul; and the discovery of
this essential life that exists in them, beyond the life of every day,
comes fraught with terror. Hilda and Solness are two souls to whom
a flash has revealed their situation in the true life. Diverse ways
there are by which knowledge of our fellows may come to us. Two or
three men, perhaps, are seen by me almost daily. For a long time it
is merely by their gestures that I distinguish them, by their habits,
be these of mind or body, by the manner in which they feel, act or
think. But, in the course of every friendship of some duration, there
comes to us a mysterious moment when we seem to perceive the exact
relationship of our friend to the unknown that surrounds him, when
we discover the attitude destiny has assumed towards him. And it is
from this moment that he truly belongs to us. We have seen, once and
for all, the treatment held in store for him by events. We know that
however such a one may seclude himself in the recesses of his dwelling,
in dread lest his slightest movement stir up that which lies in the
great reservoirs of the future, his forethought will avail him nothing,
and the innumerable events that destiny holds in reserve will discover
him wherever he hide, and will knock one after another at his door. And
even so do we know that this other will sally forth in vain in pursuit
of adventure. He will ever return empty-handed. No sooner are our eyes
thus opened than unerring knowledge would seem to spring to life,
self-created, within our soul; and we know with absolute conviction
that the event that seems to be impending over the head of a certain
man will nevertheless most assuredly not reach him.

From this moment a special part of the soul reigns over the friendship
of even the most unintelligent, the obscurest of men. Life has become,
as it were, transposed. And when it happens that we meet one of the
men who are thus known to us, though we do but speak of the snow that
is falling or the women that pass by, something there is in each of us
which nods to the other, which examines and asks its questions without
our knowledge, which interests itself in contingencies and hints at
events that it is impossible for us to understand....

Thus do I conceive it to be with Hilda and Solness; it is thus surely
that they regard each other. Their conversation resembles nothing
that we have ever heard, inasmuch as the poet has endeavoured to
blend in one expression both the inner and the outer dialogue. A new,
indescribable power dominates this somnambulistic drama. All that is
said therein at once hides and reveals the sources of an unknown life.
And if we are bewildered at times, let us not forget that our soul
often appears to our feeble eyes to be but the maddest of forces, and
that there are in man many regions more fertile, more profound and more
interesting than those of his reason or his intelligence....




THE STAR




THE STAR


WELL might it be said that, from century to century, a tragic poet ‘has
wandered through the labyrinths of destiny with the torch of poesy
in his hand.’ For in this way has each one, according to the forces
of his hour, fixed the souls of the annals of man, and it is divine
history that has thus been composed. It is in the poets alone that we
can follow the countless variations of the great unchanging power; and
to follow them is indeed interesting, for at the root of the idea that
they have formed of this power is to be found, perhaps, the purest
essence of a nation’s soul. It is a power that has never entirely
ceased to be, yet moments there are when it scarcely seems to stir;
and at such moments one feels that life is neither very active nor
very profound. Once only has it been the object of undivided worship;
then was it, even for the gods, an awe-inspiring mystery. And there
is a thing that is passing strange—it was the very period when the
featureless divinity seemed most terrible and most incomprehensible
that was the most beautiful period of mankind, and the people to whom
destiny wore the most formidable aspect were the happiest people of all.

It would seem that a secret force must underlie this idea, or that the
idea is itself the manifestation of a force. Does man develop in the
measure that he recognises the greatness of the unknown that sways him,
or is it the unknown that develops in proportion to the man? To-day
the idea of destiny would seem to be again awakening, and to go forth
in search of it were perhaps no unprofitable quest. But where shall
it be found? To go in search of destiny—what is this but to seek all
the sorrows of man? There is no destiny of joy, no star that bodes of
happiness. The star that is so called is only a star of forbearance.
Yet is it well that we should sally forth at times in search of our
sorrows, so that we may learn to know them and admire them; and this
even though the great shapeless mass of destiny be not encountered at
the end.

Seeking our sorrows, we shall be the most effectively seeking
ourselves, for truly may it be said that the value of ourselves is
but the value of our melancholy and our disquiet. As we progress, so
do they become deeper, nobler and more beautiful; and Marcus Aurelius
is to be admired above all men, because, better than all men, has he
understood how much there is of the soul in the meek resigned smile
it must wear, at the depths of us. Thus is it, too, with the sorrows
of humanity. They follow a road which resembles the road of our own
sorrows; but it is longer, and surer, and must lead to fatherlands that
the last comers alone shall know. This road also has physical sorrow
for its starting-point; it has only just rounded the fear of the gods,
and to-day it halts by a new abyss, whose depths the very best of us
have not yet sounded.

Each century holds another sorrow dear, for each century discerns
another destiny. Certain it is that we no longer interest ourselves,
as was formerly the case, in the catastrophes of passion; and the
quality of the sorrow revealed in the most tragic masterpieces of the
past is inferior to the quality of the sorrows of to-day. It is only
indirectly that these tragedies affect us now; only by means of that
which is brought to bear on the simple accidents of love or hatred
they reproduce, by the reflection and new nobility of sentiment that
the pain of living has created within us.

There are moments when it would seem as though we were on the
threshold of a new pessimism, mysterious and, perhaps, very pure.
The most redoubtable sages, Schopenhauer, Carlyle, the Russians, the
Scandinavians, and the good optimist Emerson, too (for than a wilful
optimist there is nothing more discouraging), all these have passed our
melancholy by, unexplained. We feel that, underlying all the reasons
they have essayed to give us, there are many other profounder reasons,
whose discovery has been beyond them. The sadness of man which seemed
beautiful even to them, is still susceptible of infinite ennobling,
until at last a creature of genius shall have uttered the final word
of the sorrow that shall, perhaps, wholly purify....

In the meanwhile, we are in the hands of strange powers, whose
intentions we are on the eve of divining. At the time of the great
tragic writers of the new era, at the time of Shakespeare, Racine, and
their successors, the belief prevailed that all misfortunes came from
the various passions of the heart. Catastrophes did not hover between
two worlds: they came hence to go thither, and their point of departure
was known. Man was always the master. Much less was this the case at
the time of the Greeks, for then did fatality reign on the heights;
but it was inaccessible, and none dared interrogate it. To-day it is
fatality that we challenge, and this is perhaps the distinguishing note
of the new theatre. It is no longer the effects of disaster that arrest
our attention; it is disaster itself, and we are eager to know its
essence and its laws. It was the _nature_ of disaster with which the
earliest tragic writers were, all unconsciously, preoccupied, and this
it was that, though they knew it not, threw a solemn shadow round the
hard and violent gestures of external death; and it is this, too, that
has become the rallying-point of the most recent dramas, the centre of
light with strange flames gleaming, about which revolve the souls of
women and of men. And a step has been taken towards the mystery so that
life’s terrors may be looked in the face.

It would be interesting to discover from what point of view our latest
tragic writers appear to regard the disaster that forms the basis of
all dramatic poems. They see it from a nearer point of vision than the
Greeks, and they have penetrated deeper into the fertile darknesses of
its inner circle. The divinity is perhaps the same; they know nothing
of it, yet do they study it more closely. Whence does it come, whither
does it go, why does it descend upon us? These were problems to which
the Greeks barely gave a thought. Is it written within us, or is it
born at the same time as ourselves? Does it of its own accord start
forward to meet us, or is it summoned by conniving voices that we
cherish at the depths of us? If we could but follow, from the heights
of another world, the ways of the man over whom a great sorrow is
impending! And what man is there that does not laboriously, though all
unconsciously, himself fashion the sorrow that is to be the pivot of
his life!

The Scotch peasants have a word that might be applied to every
existence. In their legends they give the name of ‘Fey’ to the frame
of mind of a man who, notwithstanding all his efforts, notwithstanding
all help and advice, is forced by some irresistible impulse, towards
an inevitable catastrophe. It is thus that James I., the James of
Catherine Douglas, was ‘fey’ when he went, notwithstanding the terrible
omens of earth, heaven and hell, to spend the Christmas holidays in
the gloomy castle of Perth, where his assassin, the traitor Robert
Graeme, lay in wait for him. Which of us, recalling the circumstances
of the most decisive misfortune of his life, but has felt himself
similarly possessed? Be it well understood that I speak here only of
active misfortunes, of those that might have been prevented: for there
are passive misfortunes (such as the death of a person we adore) which
simply come towards us, and cannot be influenced by any movement of
ours. Bethink you of the fatal day of your life. Have we not all been
forewarned; and though it may seem to us now that destiny might have
been changed by a step we did not take, a door we did not open, a hand
we did not raise, which of us but has struggled vainly on the topmost
walls of the abyss, struggled without vigour and without hope, against
a force that was invisible and apparently without power?

The breath of air stirred by the door I opened, one evening, was for
ever to extinguish my happiness, as it would have extinguished a
flickering lamp; and now, when I think of it, I cannot tell myself that
I did not know.... And yet, it was nothing important that had taken me
to the threshold. I could have gone away, shrugging my shoulders: there
was no human reason that could force me to knock on the panel. No human
reason, nothing but destiny....

       *       *       *       *       *

Herein there is still some resemblance to the fatality of Œdipus,
and yet it is already different. One might say that it is this same
fatality seen _ab intra_. Mysterious powers hold sway within us, and
these would seem to be in league with adventures. We all cherish
enemies within our soul. They know what they do and what they force us
to do, and when they lead us to the event, they let fall half-uttered
words of warning—too few to stop us on the road—but sufficient to
make us regret, when it is too late, that we did not listen more
attentively to their wavering, ironical advice. What object can they
have, these powers that seek our destruction as though they were
self-existing and did not perish with us, seeing that it is in us
only that they have life? What is it that sets in motion all the
confederates of the universe, who fatten on our blood?

The man for whom the hour of misfortune has sounded is caught up by
an invisible whirlwind, and for years back have these powers been
combining the innumerable incidents that must bring him to the
necessary moment, to the exact spot where tears lie in wait for him.
Remember all your efforts, all your presentiments, all the unavailing
offers of help. Remember, too, the kindly circumstances that pitied
you, and tried to bar your passage, but you thrust them aside like so
many importunate beggars. And yet were they humble, timid sisters, who
desired but to save you, and they went away without saying a word, too
weak and too helpless to struggle against decided things—where decided
it is known to God alone....

Scarcely has the disaster befallen us than we have the strange
sensation of having obeyed an eternal law; and, in the midst of the
greatest sorrow, there is I know not what mysterious comfort that
rewards us for our obedience. Never do we belong more completely to
ourselves than on the morrow of an irreparable catastrophe. It seems,
then, as though we had found ourselves again, as though we had won
back a part of ourselves that was necessary and unknown. A curious
calm steals over us. For days past, almost without our knowledge,
notwithstanding that we were able to smile at faces and flowers, the
rebel forces of our soul had been waging terrible battle on the borders
of the abyss, and now that we are at the depths of it, all breathes
freely.

Even thus, without respite, do these rebel forces struggle in the
soul of every one of us; and there are times when we may see the
shadow of these combats wherein our soul may not intervene, but we
pay no heed, for to all save the unimportant do we shut our eyes. At
a time when my friends are about me it may happen that, in the midst
of talk and shouts of laughter, there shall suddenly steal over the
face of one of them something that is not of this world. A motiveless
silence shall instantly prevail, and for a second’s space all shall be
unconsciously looking forth with the eyes of the soul. Whereupon, the
words and smiles, that had disappeared like frightened frogs in a lake,
will again mount to the surface, more violent than before. But the
invisible, here as everywhere, has gathered its tribute. Something has
understood that a fight was over, that a star was rising or falling and
that a destiny had just been decided....

Perhaps it had been decided before; and who knows whether the struggle
be not a mere simulacrum? If I push open to-day the door of the house
wherein I am to meet the first smiles of a sorrow that shall know no
end, I do these things for a longer time than one imagines. Of what
avail to cultivate an ego on which we have so little influence? It is
our star which it behoves us to watch. It is good or bad, pallid or
puissant, and not by all the might of the sea can it be changed. Some
there are who may confidently play with their star as one might play
with a glass ball. They may throw it and hazard it where they list;
faithfully will it ever return to their hands. They know full well
that it cannot be broken. But there are many others who dare not even
raise their eyes towards their star, without it detach itself from the
firmament and fall in dust at their feet....

But it is dangerous to speak of the star, dangerous even to think of
it; for it is often the sign that it is on the point of extinction....

We find ourselves here in the abysses of night, where we await what has
to be. There is no longer question of free will, which we have left
thousands of leagues below: we are in a region where the will itself is
but destiny’s ripest fruit. We must not complain; something is already
known to us, and we have discovered a few of the ways of fortune. We
lie in wait like the birdcatcher studying the habits of migratory
birds, and when an event is signalled on the horizon we know full well
that it will not remain there alone, but that its brothers will flock
in troops to the same spot. Vaguely have we learned that there are
certain thoughts, certain souls, that attract events; that some beings
there are who divert events in their flight, as there are others who
cause them to congregate from the four quarters of the globe.

Above all do we know that certain ideas are fraught with extreme
danger; that do we but for an instant deem ourselves in safety, this
alone suffices to draw down the thunderbolt; we know that happiness
creates a void, into which tears will speedily be hurled. After a time,
too, we learn something of the preferences of events. It is soon borne
home to us that if we take a few steps along the path of life by the
side of this one of our brothers, the ways of fortune will no longer
be the same, whereas, with this other, our existence will encounter
unvarying events, coming in regular order. We feel that some beings
there are who protect in the unknown, others who drag us into danger
there; we feel that there are some who awaken the future, others who
lull it into slumber. We suspect, further, that things at their birth
are but feeble, that they draw their force from within us, and that,
in every adventure, there is a brief moment when our instinct warns
us that we are still the lords of destiny. In fine, there are some
who dare assert that we can learn to be happy, that, as we become
better, so do we meet men of loftier mind; that a man who is good
attracts, with irresistible force, events as good as he, and that, in
a beautiful soul, the saddest fortune is transformed into beauty....

Indeed, is it not within the knowledge of us all that goodness beckons
to goodness, and that those for whom we devote ourselves are always
the same; that they are always the same, those whom we betray? When
the same sorrow knocks at two adjoining doors, at the houses of the
just and the unjust, will its method of action be identical in both?
If you are pure, will not your misfortunes be pure? To have known how
to change the past into a few saddened smiles—is this not to master
the future? And does it not seem that, even in the inevitable, there
is something we can keep back? Do not great hazards lie dormant that
a too sudden movement of ours may awaken on the horizon; and would
this misfortune have befallen you to-day, but for the thoughts that
this morning kept too noisy festival in your soul? Is this all that
our wisdom has been able to glean in the darkness? Who would dare
affirm that in these regions there be more substantial truths? In the
meanwhile, let us learn how to smile, let us learn how to weep, in the
silence of humblest kindliness. Slowly there rises above these things
the shrouded face of the destiny of to-day. Of the veil that formerly
covered it, a minute corner has been lifted, and there, where the veil
is not, do we recognise, to our disquiet, on the one side, _the power
of those who live not yet_, on the other, _the power of the dead_. The
mystery has again been shifted further from us—that is all. We have
enlarged the icy hand of destiny; and we find that, in its shadow,
the hands of our ancestors are clasped by the hands of our sons yet
unborn. One act there was that we deemed the sanctuary of all our
rights, and love remained the supreme refuge of all those on whom the
chains of life weighed too heavily. Here, at least, in the isolation
of this secret temple, we told ourselves that no one entered with us.
Here, for an instant, we could breathe; here, at last, it was our soul
that reigned, and free was its choice in that which was the centre of
liberty itself! But now we are told that it is not for our own sake
that we love. We are told that in the very temple of love we do but
obey the unvarying orders of an invisible throng. We are told that a
thousand centuries divide us from ourselves when we choose the woman
we love, and that the first kiss of the betrothed is but the seal that
thousands of hands, craving for birth, impress upon the lips of the
mother they desire. And, further, we know that the dead do not die. We
know now that it is not in our churches that they are to be found, but
in the houses, the habits, of us all. That there is not a gesture, a
thought, a sin, a tear, an atom of acquired consciousness that is lost
in the depths of the earth; and that at the most insignificant of our
acts our ancestors arise, not in their tombs where they move not, but
in ourselves, where they always live....

Thus are we led by past and future. And the present, which is the
substance of us, sinks to the bottom of the sea, like some tiny
island at which two irreconcilable oceans have been unceasingly
gnawing. Heredity, will, destiny, all mingle noisily in our soul; but,
notwithstanding everything, far above everything, it is the silent star
that reigns. No matter with what temporary labels we may bedeck the
monstrous vases that contain the invisible, words can tell us scarcely
anything of that which should be told. Heredity, nay destiny itself,
what are these but a ray of this star, a ray that is lost in the
mysterious night? And all that is might well be more mysterious still.
‘We give the name of destiny to all that limits us,’ says one of the
great sages of our time: wherefore it behoves us to be grateful to all
those who tremblingly grope their way the side of the frontier. ‘If
we are brutal and barbarous,’ he goes on, ‘fatality takes a form that
is brutal and barbarous. As refinement comes to us, so do our mishaps
become refined. If we rise to spiritual culture, antagonism takes
unto itself a spiritual form.’ It is perhaps true that even as our
soul soars aloft, so does it purify destiny, although it is also true
that we are menaced by the self-same sorrows that menace the savages.
But we have other sorrows of which they have no suspicion; and the
spirit, as it rises, does but discover still more, at every horizon.
‘We give the name of destiny to all that limits us.’ Let us do our
utmost that destiny become not too circumscribed. It is good to enlarge
one’s sorrows, since thus does enlargement come to our consciousness,
and there, there alone do we truly feel that we live. And it is also
the only means of fulfilling our supreme duty towards other worlds;
since it is probably on us alone that it is incumbent to augment the
consciousness of the earth.




THE INVISIBLE GOODNESS




THE INVISIBLE GOODNESS


IT is a thing, said to me one evening the sage I had chanced to meet by
the sea shore, whereon the waves were breaking almost noiselessly—it
is a thing that we scarcely notice, that none seem to take into
account, and yet do I conceive it to be one of the forces that
safeguard mankind. In a thousand diverse ways do the gods from whom
we spring reveal themselves within us, but it may well be that this
unnoticed secret goodness, to which sufficiently direct allusion has
never yet been made, is the purest token of their eternal life. Whence
it comes we know not. It is there in its simplicity, smiling on the
threshold of our soul; and those in whom its smiles lie deepest, or
shine forth most frequently, may make us suffer day and night and they
will, yet shall it be beyond our power to cease to love them....

It is not of this world, and still are there few agitations of ours in
which it takes not part. It cares not to reveal itself even in look
or tear. Nay, it seeks concealment, for reasons one cannot divine. It
is as though it were afraid to make use of its power. It knows that
its most involuntary movement will cause immortal things to spring to
life about it; and we are miserly with immortal things. Why are we so
fearful lest we exhaust the heaven within us? We dare not act upon the
whisper of the God who inspires us. We are afraid of everything that
cannot be explained by word or gesture: and we shut our eyes to all
that we do, ourselves notwithstanding, in the empire where explanations
are vain! Whence comes the timidity of the divine in man? For truly
might it be said that the nearer a movement of our soul approaches the
divine, so much the more scrupulously do we conceal it from the eyes of
our brethren. Can it be that man is nothing but a frightened god? Or
has the command been laid upon us that the superior powers must not be
betrayed? Upon all that does not form part of this too visible world
there rests the tender meekness of the little ailing girl, for whom her
mother will not send when strangers come to the house. And therefore
it is that this secret goodness of ours has never yet passed through
the silent portals of our soul. It lives within us like a prisoner
forbidden to approach the barred window of her cell. But indeed, what
matter though it do not approach? Enough that it be there. Hide as it
may, let it but raise its head, move a link of its chain or open its
hand, and the prison is illumined, the pressure of radiance from within
bursts open the iron barrier, and then, suddenly, there yawns a gulf
between words and beings, a gulf peopled with agitated angels: silence
falls over all: the eyes turn away for a moment and two souls embrace
tearfully on the threshold....

It is not a thing that comes from this earth of ours, and all
descriptions can be of no avail. They who would understand must have,
in themselves too, _the same point of sensibility_. If you have
never in your life felt the power of _your invisible goodness_, go
no further; it would be useless. But are there really any who have
not felt this power, and have the worst of us never been invisibly
good? I know not: of so many in this world does the aim seem to be the
discouragement of the divine in their soul. And yet there needs but one
instant of respite for the divine to spring up again, and even the
wickedest are not incessantly on their guard; and hence doubtless has
it arisen that so many of the wicked are good, unseen of all, whereas
divers saints and sages are not invisibly good....

More than once have I been the cause of suffering, he went on, even
as each being is the cause of suffering about him. I have caused
suffering because we are in a world where all is held together by
invisible threads, in a world where none are alone, and where the
gentlest gesture of love or kindliness may so often wound the innocence
by our side!—I have caused suffering, too, because there are times
when the best and tenderest are impelled to seek I know not what part
of themselves in the grief of others. For, indeed, there are seeds
that only spring up in our soul beneath the rain of tears shed because
of us, and none the less do these seeds produce good flowers and
salutary fruit. What would you? It is no law of our making, and I know
not whether I would dare to love the man who had made no one weep.
Frequently, indeed, will the greatest suffering be caused by those
whose love is greatest, for a strange timid, tender cruelty is most
often the anxious sister of love. On all sides does love search for the
proofs of love, and the first proofs—who is not prone to discover them
in the tears of the beloved?

Even death could not suffice to reassure the lover who dared to give
ear to the unreasoning claims of love; for to the intimate cruelty of
love, the instant of death seems too brief; over beyond death there
is yet room for a sea of doubts, and even in those who die together
may disquiet still linger as they die. Long, slowly falling tears
are needed here. Grief is love’s first food, and every love that has
not been fed on a little pure suffering must die like the babe that
one had tried to nourish on the nourishment of a man. Will the love
inspired by the woman who always brought the smile to your lips be
quite the same as the love you feel for her who at times called forth
your tears? Alas! needs must love weep, and often indeed is it at the
very moment when the sobs burst forth that love’s chains are forged and
tempered for life....

Thus, he continued, I have caused suffering because I loved, and also
have I caused suffering because I did not love—but how great was the
difference in the two cases! In the one the slowly dropping tears of
well-tried love seemed already to know, at the depths of them, that
they were bedewing all that was ineffable in our united souls; in the
other the poor tears knew that they were falling in solitude on a
desert. But it is at those very moments when the soul is all ear—or,
haply, all soul—that I have recognised the might of an invisible
goodness that could offer to the wretched tears of an expiring love the
divine illusions of a love on the eve of birth. Has there never come
to you one of those sorrowful evenings when dejection lay heavy upon
your unsmiling kisses, and it at length dawned upon your soul that it
had been mistaken? With direst difficulty did your words ring forth in
the cold air of the separation that was to be final; you were about to
part for ever, and your almost lifeless hands were outstretched for
the farewell of a departure that should know no return, when suddenly
your soul made an imperceptible movement within itself. On that instant
did the soul by the side of you awake on the summits of its being;
something sprang to life in regions loftier far than the love of jaded
lovers; and for all that the bodies might shrink asunder, henceforth
would the souls never forget that for an instant they had beheld each
other high above mountains they had never seen, and that for a second’s
space they had been good with a goodness they had never known until
that day....

What can this be, this mysterious movement that I speak of here in
connection with love only, but which may well take place in the
smallest events of life? Is it I know not what sacrifice or inner
embrace, is it the profoundest desire to be soul for a soul, or the
consciousness, ever quickening within us, of the presence of a life
that is invisible, but equal to our own? Is it all that is admirable
and sorrowful in the mere act of living that, at such moments, floods
our being—is it the aspect of life, one and indivisible? I know not;
but in truth it is then that we feel that there lurks, somewhere, an
unknown force; it is then that we feel that we are the treasures of an
unknown God who loves all, that not a gesture of this God may pass
unperceived, and that we are at length in the region of things that do
not betray themselves....

Certain it is that, from the day of our birth to the day of our death,
we never emerge from this clearly defined region, but wander in God
like helpless sleepwalkers, or like the blind who despairingly seek the
very temple in which they do indeed befind themselves. We are there in
life, man against man, soul against soul, and day and night are spent
under arms. We never see each other, we never touch each other. We see
nothing but bucklers and helmets, we touch nothing but iron and brass.
But let a tiny circumstance, come from the simpleness of the sky, for
one instant only cause the weapons to fall, are there not always tears
beneath the helmet, childlike smiles behind the buckler, and is not
another verity revealed?

He thought for a moment, then went on, more sadly: A woman—as I
believe I told you just now—a woman to whom I had caused suffering
against my will—for the most careful of us scatter suffering around
them without their knowledge—a woman to whom I had caused suffering
against my will, revealed to me one evening the sovereign power of this
invisible good. To be good we must needs have suffered; but perhaps it
is necessary to have caused suffering before we can become better. This
was brought home to me that evening. I felt that I had arrived, alone,
at that sad zone of kisses when it seems to us that we are visiting
the hovels of the poor, while she, who had lingered on the road, was
still smiling in the palace of the first days. Love, as men understand
it, was dying between us like a child stricken with a disease come one
knows not whence, a disease that has no pity. We said nothing. It would
be impossible for me to recall what my thoughts were at that earnest
moment. They were doubtless of no significance. I was probably thinking
of the last face I had seen, of the quivering gleam of a lantern at
a deserted street corner; and, nevertheless, _everything took place_
in a light a thousand times purer, a thousand times higher, than had
there intervened all the forces of pity and love which I command in my
thoughts and my heart. We parted, and not a word was spoken, but at one
and the same moment had we understood our inexpressible thought. We
know now that another love had sprung to life, a love that demands not
the words, the little attentions and smiles of ordinary love. We have
never met again. Perhaps centuries will elapse before we ever do meet
again.

  ‘Much is to learn, much to forget,
  Through worlds I shall traverse not a few’

before we shall again find ourselves _in the same movement of the
soul_ as on that evening: but we can well afford to wait....

And thus, ever since that day, have I greeted, in all places, even
in the very bitterest of moments, the beneficent presence of this
marvellous power. He who has but once clearly seen it, shall never
again find it possible to turn away from its face. You will often
behold it smiling in the last retreat of hatred, in the depths of the
cruellest tears. And yet does it not reveal itself to the eyes of the
body. Its nature changes from the moment that it manifests itself by
means of an exterior act; and we are no longer in the truth according
to the soul, but in a kind of falsehood as conceived by man. Goodness
and love that are self-conscious have no influence on the soul, for
they have departed from the kingdoms where they have their dwelling;
but, do they only remain blind, they can soften Destiny itself. I have
known more than one man who performed every act of kindness and mercy
without touching a single soul; and I have known others, who seemed to
live in falsehood and injustice, yet were no souls driven from them
nor did any for an instant even believe that these men were not good.
Nay, more, even those who do not know you, who are merely told of your
acts of goodness and deeds of love—if you be not good according to the
invisible goodness, these, even, will feel that something is lacking,
and they will never be touched in the depths of their being. One might
almost believe that there exists, somewhere, a place where all is
weighed in the presence of the spirits, or perhaps, out yonder, the
other side of the night, a reservoir of certitudes whither the silent
herd of souls flock every morning to slake their thirst.

Perhaps we do not yet know what the word ‘to love’ means. There are
within us lives in which we love unconsciously. To love thus means
more than to have pity, to make inner sacrifices, to be anxious to
help and give happiness; it is a thing that lies a thousand fathoms
deeper, where our softest, swiftest, strongest words cannot reach
it. At moments we might believe it to be a recollection, furtive but
excessively keen, of the great primitive unity. There is in this love
a force that nothing can resist. Which of us—an’ he question himself
the side of the light, from which our gaze is habitually averted—which
of us but will find in himself the recollection of certain strange
workings of this force? Which of us, when by the side of the most
ordinary person perhaps, but has suddenly become conscious of the
advent of something that none had summoned? Was it the soul, or perhaps
life, that had turned within itself like a sleeper on the point of
awakening? I know not; nor did you know, and no one spoke of it; but
you did not separate from each other as though nothing had happened.

To love thus is to love according to the soul; and there is no soul
that does not respond to this love. For the soul of man is a guest that
has gone hungry these centuries back, and never has it to be summoned
twice to the nuptial feast.

The souls of all our brethren are ever hovering about us, craving for a
caress, and only waiting for the signal. But how many beings there are
who all their life long have not dared make such a signal! It is the
disaster of our entire existence that we live thus away from our soul,
and stand in such dread of its slightest movement. Did we but allow it
to smile frankly in its silence and its radiance, we should be already
living an eternal life. We have only to think for an instant how much
it succeeds in accomplishing during those rare moments when we knock
off its chains—for it is our custom to enchain it as though it were
distraught—what it does in love, for instance, for there we do permit
it at times to approach the lattices of external life. And would it not
be in accordance with the primal truth if all men were to feel that
they were face to face with each other, even as the woman feels with
the man she loves?

This invisible and divine goodness, of which I only speak here because
of its being one of the surest and nearest signs of the unceasing
activity of our soul, this invisible and divine goodness ennobles, in
decisive fashion, all that it has unconsciously touched. Let him who
has a grievance against his fellow, descend into himself and seek out
whether he never has been good in the presence of that fellow. For
myself, I have never met any one by whose side I have felt my invisible
goodness bestir itself, without he has become, at that very instant,
better than myself. Be good at the depths of you, and you will discover
that those who surround you will be good even to the same depths.
Nothing responds more infallibly to the secret cry of goodness than the
secret cry of goodness that is near. While you are actively good in the
invisible, all those who approach you will unconsciously do things that
they could not do by the side of any other man. Therein lies a force
that has no name; a spiritual rivalry that knows no resistance. It is
as though this were the actual place where is the sensitive spot of our
soul; for there are souls that seem to have forgotten their existence
and to have renounced everything that enables the being to rise; but,
once touched here, they all draw themselves erect; and in the divine
plains of the secret goodness, the most humble of souls cannot endure
defeat.

And yet it is possible that nothing is changing in the life one sees;
but is it only that which matters, and is our existence indeed confined
to actions we can take in our hand like stones on the high road? If
you ask yourself, as we are told we should ask every evening, ‘What
of immortal have I done to-day?’ Is it always on the material side
that we can count, weigh and measure unerringly; is it there that you
must begin your search? It is possible for you to cause extraordinary
tears to flow; it is possible that you may fill a heart with unheard
of certitudes, and give eternal life unto a soul, and no one shall
know of it, nor shall you even know yourself. It may be that nothing
is changing; it may be that were it put to the test all would crumble,
and that this goodness we speak of would yield to the smallest fear.
It matters not. Something divine has happened; and somewhere must our
God have smiled. May it not be the supreme aim of life thus to bring
to birth the inexplicable within ourselves; and do we know how much we
add to ourselves when we awake something of the incomprehensible that
slumbers in every corner? Here you have awakened love which will not
fall asleep again. The soul that your soul has regarded, that has wept
with you the holy tears of the solemn joy that none may behold, will
bear you no resentment, not even in the midst of torture. It will not
even feel the need of forgiving. So convinced is it of one knows not
what, that nothing can henceforth dim or efface the smile that it wears
within; for nothing can ever separate two souls which, for an instant,
‘have been good together.’




THE DEEPER LIFE




THE DEEPER LIFE


IT is well that men should be reminded that the very humblest of them
has the power to ‘fashion, after a divine model that he chooses not,
a great moral personality, composed in equal parts of himself and the
ideal; and that if anything lives in fullest reality, of a surety it is
that.’

Each man has to seek out his own special aptitude for a higher
life in the midst of the humble and inevitable reality of daily
existence. Than this there can be no nobler aim in life. It is only
by the communications we have with the infinite that we are to be
distinguished from each other. If the hero is greater than the
wretch who marches by his side, it is because at a certain moment of
his existence there has come to him a fuller consciousness of one of
these communications. If it is true that creation does not stop at
man and that we are surrounded by invisible beings who are superior
to us, their superiority can only consist in that they have, with the
infinite, communications whose nature we cannot even imagine.

It lies within our power to increase these communications. In the life
of every man has there been a day when the heavens opened of their own
accord, and it is almost always from that very instant that dates his
true spiritual personality. It is doubtless at that instant that are
formed the invisible, eternal features that we reveal, though we know
it not, to angels and to souls. But with most men it is chance alone
that has caused the heavens to open; and they have not chosen the face
whereby the angels know them in the infinite, nor have they understood
how to ennoble and purify its features—which do indeed but owe their
being to an accidental joy or sadness, an accidental thought or fear.

Our veritable birth dates from the day when, for the first time, we
feel at the deepest of us that there is something grave and unexpected
in life. Some there are who realise suddenly that they are not alone
under the sky. To others will it be brusquely revealed, while shedding
a tear or giving a kiss, that ‘the source of all that is good and holy
from the universe up to God is hidden behind a night, full of too
distant stars’; a third will see a divine hand stretched forth between
his joy and his misfortune; and yet another will have understood that
it is the dead who are in the right. One will have had pity, another
will have admired or been afraid. Often does it need almost nothing,
a word, a gesture, a little thing that is not even a thought. ‘Before,
I loved thee as a brother, John,’ says one of Shakespeare’s heroes,
admiring the other’s action, ‘but now I do respect thee as my soul.’ On
that day it is probable that a being will have come into the world.

We can be born thus more than once; and each birth brings us a little
nearer to our God. But most of us are content to wait till an event,
charged with almost irresistible radiance, intrudes itself violently
upon our darkness, and enlightens us, in our despite. We await I know
not what happy coincidence, when it may so come about that the eyes of
our soul shall be open at the very moment that something extraordinary
takes place. But in everything that happens is there light; and the
greatness of the greatest of men has but consisted in that they had
trained their eyes to be open to every ray of this light. Is it indeed
essential that your mother should breathe her last in your arms, that
your children should perish in a shipwreck, and that you yourself
should pass by the side of death, for you at length to understand that
you have your being in an incomprehensible world where you shall be
for ever, where an unseen God, who is eternally alone, dwells with His
creatures? Must your betrothed die in a fire, or disappear before your
eyes in the green depths of the ocean, for it to be revealed to you
for an instant that the last limits of the kingdom of love transcend
perhaps the scarcely visible flames of Mira, Altair or Berenice’s
tresses? Had your eyes been open, might you not have beheld in a
kiss that which to-day you perceive in a catastrophe? Are the divine
recollections that slumber in our souls to be awakened only by the
lance-thrusts of grief? The sage needs no such violent arousing. He
sees a tear, a maiden’s gesture, a drop of water that falls; he listens
to a passing thought, presses a brother’s hand, approaches a lip, with
open eyes and open soul. He never ceases to behold that of which you
have caught but a passing glimpse; and a smile will readily tell him
all that it needed a tempest, or even the hand of death, to reveal to
you.

For what are in reality the things we call ‘Wisdom,’ ‘Virtue,’
‘Heroism,’ ‘sublime hours,’ and ‘great moments of life,’ but the
moments when we have more or less issued forth from ourselves, and have
been able to halt, be it only for an instant, on the step of one of the
eternal gates whence we see that the faintest cry, the most colourless
thought, and most nerveless gestures do not drop into nothingness; or
that if they do indeed thus drop, the fall itself is so immense that
it suffices to give an august character to our life? Why wait till
the firmament shall open amid the roar of the thunderbolt? We must
watch for the happy moments when it opens in silence; and it is ever
thus opening. You seek God in your life, and you say God appears not.
But in what life are there not thousands of hours akin to the hour in
that drama where all are waiting for the divine intervention, and none
perceive it, till an invisible thought that has flitted across the
consciousness of a dying man suddenly reveals itself, and an old man
cries out, sobbing for joy and terror, ‘But God, there is God!’....

Must we always be warned, and can we only fall on our knees when some
one is there to tell us that God is passing by? If you have loved
profoundly you have needed no one to tell you that your soul was a
thing as great in itself as the world; that the stars, the flowers, the
waves of night and sea were not solitary; that it was on the threshold
of appearances that everything began, but nothing ended, and that the
very lips you kissed belonged to a creature who was loftier, much
purer, and much more beautiful than the one whom your arms enfolded.
You have beheld that which in life cannot be seen without ecstasy. But
cannot we live as though we always loved? It was this that the saints
and heroes did; this and nothing more. Ah! truly too much of our life
is spent in waiting, like the blind men in the legend who had travelled
far so that they might hear their God. They were seated on the steps,
and when asked what they were doing in the courtyard of the sanctuary,
‘We are waiting,’ they replied, shaking their heads, ‘and God has not
yet said a single word.’ But they had not seen that the brass doors
of the temple were closed, and they knew not that the edifice was
resounding with the voice of their God. Never for an instant does God
cease to speak; but no one thinks of opening the doors. And yet, with
a little watchfulness, it were not difficult to hear the word that God
must speak concerning our every act.

We all live in the sublime. Where else can we live? That is the only
place of life. And if aught be lacking, it is not the chance of living
in heaven, rather is it watchfulness and meditation, also perhaps a
little ecstasy of soul. Though you have but a little room, do you fancy
that God is not there, too, and that it is impossible to live therein
a life that shall be somewhat lofty? If you complain of being alone,
of the absence of events, of loving no one and being unloved, do you
think that the words are true? Do you imagine that one can possibly
be alone, that love can be a thing one knows, a thing one sees; that
events can be weighed like the gold and silver of ransom? Cannot a
living thought—proud or humble, it matters not; so it come but from
your soul, it is great for you—cannot a lofty desire, or simply a
moment of solemn watchfulness to life, enter a little room? And if you
love not, or are unloved, and can yet see with some depth of insight
that thousands of things are beautiful, that the soul is great and
life almost unspeakably earnest, is that not as beautiful as though
you loved or were loved? And if the sky itself is hidden from you,
‘does not the great starry sky,’ asks the poet, ‘spread over our soul,
in spite of all, under guise of death?’ ... All that happens to us is
divinely great, and we are always in the centre of a great world. But
we must accustom ourselves to live like an angel who has just sprung
to life, like a woman who loves, or a man on the point of death. If
you knew that you were going to die to-night, or merely that you
would have to go away and never return, would you, looking upon men
and things for the last time, see them in the same light that you have
hitherto seen them? Would you not love as you never yet have loved?
Is it the virtue or evil of the appearances around you that would be
magnified? Would it be given you to behold the beauty or the ugliness
of the soul? Would not everything, down to actual evil and suffering,
be transformed into love, overflowing with gentlest tears? Does not,
to quote the sage, each opportunity for pardon rob departure or death
of something of its bitterness? And yet, in the radiance or sorrow or
death, is it towards truth or error that one has taken the last steps
one is allowed to take?

Is it the living or the dying who can see and are in the right? Ah!
thrice happy they who have thought, spoken, and acted so as to
receive the approval of those who are about to die, or to whom a
great sorrow has given clearer insight! The sage, to whom none would
hearken in life, can meet with no sweeter reward. If you have lived in
obscure beauty, you have no cause for disquiet. At the end there must
always sound within the heart of man an hour of supreme justice; and
misfortune opens eyes that were never open before. Who knows whether at
this very moment your shadow be not passing over the soul of a dying
man and be not recognised by him as the shadow of one who already knew
the truth? May it not be at the bedside of the last agony that is woven
the veritable and most precious crown of sage and hero, and of all who
have known how to live earnestly amid the sorrows, lofty, pure, and
discreet, of life according to the soul?

‘Death,’ says Lavater, ‘does not only beautify our inanimate form; nay,
the mere thought of death gives a more beautiful form to life itself.’
And even so does every thought, that is infinite as death, beautify our
life. But we must not deceive ourselves. To every man there come noble
thoughts, that pass across his heart like great white birds. Alas! they
do not count; they are strangers whom we are surprised to see, whom we
dismiss with importunate gesture. Their time is too short to touch our
life. Our soul will not become earnest and deep-searching, as is the
soul of the angels, for that we have, for one fleeting instant, beheld
the universe in the shadow of death or eternity, in the radiance of
joy or the flames of beauty and love. We have all known moments such
as these, moments that have but left worthless ashes behind. These
things must be habitual with us; it is of no avail that they should
come by chance. We must learn to live in a beauty, an earnestness, that
shall have become part of ourselves. In life, there is no creature so
degraded but knows full well which is the noble and beautiful thing
that he should do; but this noble and beautiful thing is not strong
enough within him. It is this invisible and abstract strength that it
must be our endeavour to increase, first of all. And this strength
increases only in those who have acquired the habit of resting, more
frequently than others, upon the summits where life absorbs the soul,
upon the heights whence we see that every act and every thought are
infallibly bound up with something great and immortal. Look upon
men and things with the inner eye, with its form and desire, never
forgetting that the shadow they throw as they pass by, upon hillock or
wall, is but the fleeting image of a mightier shadow, which, like the
wing of an imperishable swan, floats over every soul that draws near
to their soul. Do not believe that thoughts such as these can be mere
ornaments, and without influence upon the lives of those who admit
them. It is far more important that one’s life should be perceived than
that it should be transformed; for no sooner has it been perceived,
than it transforms itself of its own accord. These thoughts of which I
speak make up the secret treasure of heroism; and, on the day that life
compels us to disclose this treasure, we are startled to find therein
no forces other than those by which we are impelled towards perfect
beauty. Then it is no longer necessary that a great king should die for
us to remember that ‘the world does not end at the house-doors,’ and
not an evening passes but the smallest thing suffices to ennoble the
soul.

Yet it is not by telling yourself that God is great and that you move
in His radiance, that you will be able to live in the beauty and
fertile depths where the heroes dwelt. You may perhaps remind yourself,
day and night, that the hands of all the invisible powers are waving
over your head like a tent with countless folds, and yet shall the
least gesture of these hands be imperceptible to you. It behoves you
to be keenly vigilant; and better had you watch in the market-place
than slumber in the temple. Beauty and grandeur are everywhere; for it
needs but an unexpected incident to reveal them to us. This is known to
nearly all men; but know it though they may, it is only when fortune or
death lashes them that they grope around the wall of life in search of
the crevices through which God may be seen. They know full well that
there are eternal crevices even in the humble walls of a hovel, and
that the smallest window cannot take away a line or a star from the
immensity of heavenly space. But it is not enough to possess a truth;
it is essential that the truth should possess us.

And yet are we in a world where the smallest events assume,
spontaneously, a beauty that ever becomes purer and loftier. There is
nothing that coalesces more readily than earth and sky; if your eyes
have rested upon the stars, before enfolding in your arms the woman you
love, your embrace will not be the same as though you had merely looked
at the walls of your room. Be sure that the day you lingered to follow
a ray of light through a crevice in the door of life, you did something
as great as though you had bandaged the wounds of your enemy, for at
that moment did you no longer have any enemies.

Our lives must be spent seeking our God, for God hides; but His
artifices, once they be known, seem so simple and smiling! From that
moment, the merest nothing reveals His presence, and the greatness of
our life depends on so little! Even thus may the verse of a poet, in
the midst of the humble incidents of ordinary days, suddenly reveal to
us something that is stupendous. No solemn word has been pronounced,
and we feel that nothing has been called forth; and yet, why has an
ineffable face beckoned to us from behind an old man’s tears, why does
a vast night, starred with angels, extend over the smile of a child,
and why, around a yes or no, murmured by a soul that sings and busies
itself with other matters, do we suddenly hold our breath for an
instant and say to ourselves, ‘Here is the house of God, and this one
of the approaches to heaven’?

It is because these poets have been more heedful than we to the
‘never-ending shadow.’ ... That is the essence of supreme poetry, that,
and that alone, and its sole aim is to keep open ‘the great road that
leads from the seen to the unseen.’ But that is life’s supreme aim,
too, and it is easier far to attain in life than in the noblest of
poems, for these have had to abandon the two great wings of silence.
Not a single day is trivial. It is essential that this idea should sink
into our life and take root therein. There is no question of being sad.
Small joys, faint smiles, and great tears, all these fill up the same
nook in time and space. You can play in life as innocently ‘as a child
about a death-bed,’ and it is not the tears that are indispensable.
Smiles as well as tears open the gates of the other world. Go or come,
you will find all you need in the darkness, but never forget that you
are close to the gate.

       *       *       *       *       *

After this lengthy digression, I return to my starting-point, which was
that ‘it is well that men should be reminded that the very humblest of
them has the power to fashion, after a divine model that he chooses
not, a great moral personality, composed in equal parts of himself
and the ideal.’ It is only in the depths of life that this ‘great
moral personality’ can be carved out; and only by means of incessant
‘revelations of the divine’ can we add to the stores of the ideal we
require. To every man is it given to attain in spirit to the heights
of virtuous life, and to know at all times what his conduct should be,
would he act like a hero or a saint. But more than this is needed.
It is essential that the spiritual atmosphere about us should be
transformed to such a degree that it ends by resembling the atmosphere
of Swedenborg’s beautiful countries of the age of gold, wherein the air
permitted not a falsehood to leave the lips. An instant comes then,
when the smallest ill that we fain would commit falls at our feet like
a leaden ball upon a disc of bronze; when everything changes, though we
know it not, into beauty, love, or truth. But this atmosphere enwraps
those only who have been heedful to ventilate their life sufficiently
by at times flinging open the gates of the other world. It is when we
are near to those gates that we see; it is when we are near to those
gates that we love. For to love one’s neighbour does not mean only
to give oneself to him, to serve, help, and sustain others. We may
possibly be neither good, nor noble, nor beautiful, even in the midst
of the greatest sacrifice; and the sister of charity who dies by the
bedside of a typhoid patient may perchance have a mean, rancorous,
miserable soul. To love one’s neighbour in the immovable depths means
to love in others that which is eternal; for one’s neighbour, in the
truest sense of the term, is that which approaches the nearest to God;
in other words, all that is best and purest in man; and it is only by
ever lingering near the gates I spoke of, that you can discover the
divine in the soul. Then will you be able to say with the great Jean
Paul: ‘When I desire to love most tenderly one who is dear to me, and
wish to forgive him everything, I have but to look at him for a few
moments in silence.’ To learn to love, one must first learn to see. ‘I
lived for twenty years by my sister’s side,’ said a friend to me, one
day, ‘and _I saw her_ for the first time at the moment of our mother’s
death.’ Here, too, it had been necessary that death should violently
fling open an eternal gate, so that two souls might behold each other
in a ray of the primeval light. Is there one amongst us who has not
near to him sisters he has never seen?

Happily, even in those whose vision is most limited, there is always
something that acts in silence as though they had seen. It is possible,
perhaps, that to be good is only to be in a little light what all are
in darkness. Therefore, doubtless, is it well that we should endeavour
to raise our life, and should strive towards summits where ill-doing
becomes impossible. And therefore, too, is it well to accustom the eye
to behold events and men in a divine atmosphere. But even that is not
indispensable; and how small must the difference seem to the eyes of
a God! We are in a world where truth reigns at the bottom of things,
and where it is not truth but falsehood that needs to be explained. If
the happiness of your brother sadden you, do not despise yourself; you
will not have to travel far along the road before you will come across
something in yourself that will not be saddened. And even though you do
not travel the road, it matters little: something there was that was
not sad....

Those who think of nothing have the same truth as those who think
of God; the truth is a little further from the threshold, that is
all. ‘Even in the life that is most ordinary,’ says Renan, ‘the part
that is done for God is enormous. The lowest of men would rather be
just than unjust: we all worship, we all pray, numbers of times every
day, without knowing it.’ And we are surprised when chance suddenly
reveals to us the importance of this divine part. There are about us
thousands and thousands of poor creatures who have nothing of beauty
in their lives: they come, they go, in obscurity, and we believe that
all is dead within them; and no one pays any heed. And then one day a
simple word, an unexpected silence, a little tear that springs from
the source of beauty itself, tell us that they have found the means of
raising aloft, in the shadow of their soul, an ideal a thousand times
more beautiful than the most beautiful things their ears have ever
heard, or their eyes ever seen. Oh, noble and pallid ideals of silence
and shadow! It is you, above all, who call forth the smile of the
angels, it is you, above all, who soar direct to God! In what myriads
of hovels, in what dens of misery, in what prisons, perhaps, are you
not being cherished at this moment, cherished with the purest blood and
tears of an unhappy soul that has never smiled; even as the bees, at
the time when all the flowers are dead about them, still offer to her
who is to be their queen a honey a thousand times more precious than
the honey they give to their little sisters of daily life.... Which of
us has not met, more than once, along the paths of life, a forsaken
soul that has yet not lost the courage to cherish, in the darkness, a
thought diviner and purer than all those that so many others had the
power to choose in the light? Here, too, it is simplicity that is God’s
favourite slave; and it is enough, perhaps, that a few sages should
know what has to be done, for the rest of us to act as though we knew
too....




THE INNER BEAUTY




THE INNER BEAUTY


NOTHING in the whole world is so athirst for beauty as the soul, nor
is there anything to which beauty clings so readily. There is nothing
in the world capable of such spontaneous up-lifting, of such speedy
ennoblement; nothing that offers more scrupulous obedience to the pure
and noble commands it receives. There is nothing in the world that
yields deeper submission to the empire of a thought that is loftier
than other thoughts. And on this earth of ours there are but few souls
that can withstand the dominion of the soul that has suffered itself to
become beautiful.

In all truth might it be said that beauty is the unique aliment of our
soul, for in all places does it search for beauty, and it perishes not
of hunger even in the most degraded of lives. For indeed nothing of
beauty can pass by and be altogether unperceived. Perhaps does it never
pass by save only in our unconsciousness, but its action is no less
puissant in gloom of night than by light of day; the joy it procures
may be less tangible, but other difference there is none. Look at the
most ordinary of men, at a time when a little beauty has contrived to
steal into their darkness. They have come together, it matters not
where, and for no special reason; but no sooner are they assembled than
their very first thought would seem to be to close the great doors
of life. Yet has each one of them, when alone, more than once lived
in accord with his soul. He has loved perhaps, of a surety he has
suffered. Inevitably must he, too, have heard the ‘sounds that come
from the distant country of Splendour and Terror’; and many an evening
has he bowed down in silence before laws that are deeper than the sea.
And yet when these men are assembled it is with the basest of things
that they love to debauch themselves. They have a strange indescribable
fear of beauty, and as their number increases so does this fear become
greater, resembling indeed their dread of silence or of a verity that
is too pure. And so true is this that, were one of them to have done
something heroic in the course of the day, he would ascribe wretched
motives to his conduct, thereby endeavouring to find excuses for it,
and these motives would lie readily to his hand in that lower region
where he and his fellows were assembled. And yet listen: a proud and
lofty word has been spoken, a word that has in a measure undammed the
springs of life. For one instant has a soul dared to reveal itself,
even such as it is in love and sorrow, such as it is in face of death
and in the solitude that dwells around the stars of night. Disquiet
prevails, on some faces there is astonishment, others smile. But have
you never felt at moments such as those how unanimous is the fervour
wherewith every soul admires, and how unspeakably even the very
feeblest, from the remotest depths of its dungeon, approves the word it
has recognised as akin to itself? For they have all suddenly sprung to
life again in the primitive and normal atmosphere that is their own;
and could you but hearken with angels’ ears, I doubt not but you would
hear mightiest applause in that kingdom of amazing radiance wherein
the souls do dwell. Do you not think that even the most timid of them
would take courage unto themselves were but similar words to be spoken
every evening? Do you not think that men would live purer lives? And
yet though the word come not again, still will something momentous have
happened, that must leave still more momentous trace behind. Every
evening will its sisters recognise the soul that pronounced the word,
and henceforth, be the conversation never so trivial, its mere presence
will, I know not how, add thereto something of majesty. Whatever else
betide, there has been a change that we cannot determine. No longer
will such absolute power be vested in the baser side of things, and
henceforth, even the most terror stricken of souls will know that there
is somewhere a place of refuge....

Certain it is that the natural and primitive relationship of soul to
soul is a relationship of beauty. For beauty is the only language of
our soul; none other is known to it. It has no other life, it can
produce nothing else, in nothing else can it take interest. And
therefore it is that the most oppressed, nay, the most degraded of
souls—if it may truly be said that a soul can be degraded—immediately
hail with acclamation every thought, every word or deed, that is
great and beautiful. Beauty is the only element wherewith the soul
is organically connected, and it has no other standard of judgment.
This is brought home to us at every moment of our life, and is no less
evident to the man by whom beauty may more than once have been denied
than to him who is ever seeking it in his heart. Should a day come when
you stand in profoundest need of another’s sympathy, would you go to
him who was wont to greet the passage of beauty with a sneering smile?
Would you go to him whose shake of the head had sullied a generous
action or a mere impulse that was pure? Even though perhaps you had
been of those who commended him, you would none the less, when it was
truth that knocked at your door, turn to the man who had known how to
prostrate himself and love. In its very depths had your soul passed its
judgment, and it is this silent and unerring judgment that will rise to
the surface, after thirty years perhaps, and send you towards a sister
who shall be more truly you than you are yourself, for that she has
been nearer to beauty....

There needs but so little to encourage beauty in our soul; so little
to awaken the slumbering angels; or perhaps is there no need of
awakening—it is enough that we lull them not to sleep. It requires
more effort to fall, perhaps, than to rise. Can we, without putting
constraint upon ourselves, confine our thoughts to everyday things at
times when the sea stretches before us, and we are face to face with
the night? And what soul is there but knows that it is ever confronting
the sea, ever in presence of an eternal night? Did we but dread beauty
less it would come about that nought else in life would be visible; for
in reality it is beauty that underlies everything, it is beauty alone
that exists. There is no soul but is conscious of this, none that is
not in readiness; but where are those that hide not their beauty? And
yet must one of them ‘begin.’ Why not dare to be the one to ‘begin’?
The others are all watching eagerly around us like little children in
front of a marvellous palace. They press upon the threshold, whispering
to each other and peering through every crevice, but there is not one
who dares put his shoulder to the door. They are all waiting for some
grown-up person to come and fling it open. But hardly ever does such a
one pass by.

And yet what is needed to become the grown-up person for whom they
lie in wait? So little! The soul is not exacting. A thought that is
almost beautiful—a thought that you speak not, but that you cherish
within you at this moment, will irradiate you as though you were a
transparent vase. They will see it and their greeting to you will be
very different than had you been meditating how best to deceive your
brother. We are surprised when certain men tell us that they have never
come across real ugliness, that they cannot conceive that a soul can be
base. Yet need there be no cause for surprise. These men had ‘begun.’
They themselves had been the first to be beautiful, and had therefore
attracted all the beauty that passed by, as a lighthouse attracts
the vessels from the four corners of the horizon. Some there are who
complain of women, for instance, never dreaming that, the first time a
man meets a woman, a single word or thought that denies the beautiful
or profound will be enough to poison for ever _his existence_ in
her soul. ‘For my part,’ said a sage to me one day, ‘I have never
come across a single woman who did not bring to me something that was
great.’ He was great himself first of all; therein lay his secret.
There is one thing only that the soul can never forgive; it is to have
been compelled to behold, or share, or pass close to an ugly action,
word, or thought. It cannot forgive, for forgiveness here were but
the denial of itself. And yet with the generality of men, ingenuity,
strength and skill do but imply that the soul must first of all be
banished from their life, and that every impulse that lies too deep
must be carefully brushed aside. Even in love do they act thus, and
therefore it is that the woman, who is so much nearer the truth, can
scarcely ever live a moment of the true life with them. It is as though
men dreaded the contact of their soul, and were anxious to keep its
beauty at immeasurable distance. Whereas, on the contrary, we should
endeavour to move in advance of ourselves. If at this moment you think
or say something that is too beautiful to be true in you—if you have
but endeavoured to think or say it to-day, on the morrow it will be
true. We must try to be more beautiful than ourselves; we shall never
distance our soul. We can never err when it is question of silent or
hidden beauty. Besides, so long as the spring within us be limpid,
it matters but little whether error there be or not. But do any of
us ever dream of making the slightest unseen effort? And yet in the
domain where we are everything is effective, for that everything is
waiting. All the doors are unlocked, we have but to push them open, and
the palace is full of manacled queens. A single word will very often
suffice to clear the mountain of refuse. Why not have the courage to
meet a base question with a noble answer? Do you imagine it would pass
quite unnoticed or merely arouse surprise? Do you not think it would
be more akin to the discourse that would naturally be held between two
souls? We know not where it may give encouragement, where freedom. Even
he who rejects your words will, in spite of himself, have taken a step
towards the beauty that is within him. Nothing of beauty dies without
having purified something, nor can aught of beauty be lost. Let us not
be afraid of sowing it along the road. It may remain there for weeks or
years, but like the diamond it cannot dissolve, and finally there will
pass by some one whom its glitter will attract; he will pick it up and
go his way, rejoicing. Then why keep back a lofty, beautiful word, for
that you doubt whether others will understand? An instant of higher
goodness was impending over you; why hinder its coming, even though
you believe not that those about you will profit thereby? What if you
are among men of the valley, is that sufficient reason for checking
the instinctive movement of your soul towards the mountain peaks? Does
darkness rob deep feeling of its power? Have the blind nought but
their eyes wherewith to distinguish those who love them from those who
love them not? Can the beauty not exist that is not understood, and is
there not in every man something that does understand—in regions far
beyond what he seems to understand, far beyond, too, what he believes
he understands? ‘Even to the very wretchedest of all,’ said to me one
day the loftiest minded creature it has ever been my happiness to
know, ‘even to the very wretchedest of all I never have the courage
to say anything in reply that is ugly or mediocre.’ I have for a long
time followed that man’s life, and have seen the inexplicable power
he exercised over the most obscure, the most unapproachable, the
blindest, even the most rebellious of souls. For no tongue can tell the
power of a soul that strives to live in an atmosphere of beauty, and is
actively beautiful in itself. And indeed is it not the quality of this
activity that renders a life either miserable or divine?

If we could but probe to the root of things it might well be discovered
that it is by the strength of some souls that are beautiful that others
are sustained in life. Is it not the idea we each form of certain
chosen ones that constitutes the only living, effective morality? But
in this idea how much is there of the soul that is chosen, how much of
him who chooses? Do not these things blend very mysteriously, and does
not this ideal morality lie infinitely deeper than the morality of the
most beautiful books? A far-reaching influence exists therein whose
limits it is indeed difficult to define, and a fountain of strength
whereat we all of us drink many times a day. Would not any weakness in
one of those creatures whom you thought perfect and loved in the region
of beauty, at once lessen your confidence in the universal greatness of
things, and would your admiration for them suffer?

And again, I doubt whether anything in the world can beautify a soul
more spontaneously, more naturally, than the knowledge that somewhere
in its neighbourhood there exists a pure and noble being whom it can
unreservedly love. When the soul has veritably drawn near to such a
being, beauty is no longer a lovely, lifeless thing that one exhibits
to the stranger, for it suddenly takes unto itself an imperious
existence, and its activity becomes so natural as to be henceforth
irresistible. Wherefore you will do well to think it over, for none are
alone, and those who are good must watch.

Plotinus, in the eighth book of the fifth ‘Ennead,’ after speaking
of the beauty that is ‘intelligible’—_i.e._, divine, concludes
thus: ‘As regards ourselves, we are beautiful when we belong to
ourselves, and ugly when we lower ourselves to our inferior nature.
Also are we beautiful when we know ourselves, and ugly when we have
no such knowledge.’ Bear it in mind, however, that here we are on the
mountains, where not to know oneself means far more than mere ignorance
of what takes place within us at moments of jealousy or love, fear or
envy, happiness or unhappiness. Here not to know oneself means to be
unconscious of all the divine that throbs in man. As we wander from
the gods within us so does ugliness enwrap us; as we discover them, so
do we become more beautiful. But it is only by revealing the divine
that is in us that we may discover the divine in others. Needs must
one god beckon to another, and no signal is so imperceptible but they
will every one of them respond. It cannot be said too often that, be
the crevice never so small, it will yet suffice for all the waters of
heaven to pour into our soul. Every cup is stretched out to the unknown
spring, and we are in a region where none think of aught but beauty. If
we could ask of an angel what it is that our souls do in the shadow,
I believe the angel would answer, after having looked for many years
perhaps, and seen far more than the things the soul seems to do in the
eyes of men, ‘They transform into beauty all the little things that
are given to them.’ Ah! we must admit that the human soul is possessed
of singular courage! Resignedly does it labour, its whole life long,
in the darkness whither most of us relegate it, where it is spoken to
by none. There, never complaining, does it do all that in its power
lies, striving to tear from out the pebbles we fling to it the nucleus
of eternal light that peradventure they contain. And in the midst of
its work it is ever lying in wait for the moment when it may show, to
a sister who is more tenderly cared for, or who chances to be nearer,
the treasures it has so toilfully amassed. But thousands of existences
there are that no sister visits; thousands of existences wherein life
has infused such timidity into the soul that it departs without saying
a word, without even once having been able to deck itself with the
humblest jewels of its humble crown....

And yet, in spite of all, does it watch over everything from out its
invisible heaven. It warns and loves, it admires, attracts, repels. At
every fresh event does it rise to the surface, where it lingers till
it be thrust down again, being looked upon as wearisome and insane.
It wanders to and fro, like Cassandra at the gates of the Atrides.
It is ever giving utterance to words of shadowy truth, but there are
none to listen. When we raise our eyes it yearns for a ray of sun or
star, that it may weave into a thought, or, haply, an impulse, which
shall be unconscious and very pure. And if our eyes bring it nothing,
still will it know how to turn its pitiful disillusion into something
ineffable, that it will conceal even till its death. When we love, how
eagerly does it drink in the light from behind the closed door—keen
with expectation, it yet wastes not a minute, and the light that steals
through the apertures becomes beauty and truth to the soul. But if the
door opens not (and how many lives are there wherein it does open?) it
will go back into its prison, and its regret will perhaps be a loftier
verity that shall never be seen, for we are now in the region of
transformations whereof none may speak; and though nothing born this
side of the door can be lost, yet does it never mingle with our life....

I said just now that the soul changed into beauty the little things
we gave to it. It would even seem, the more we think of it, that the
soul has no other reason for existence, and that all its activity is
consumed in amassing, at the depths of us, a treasure of indescribable
beauty. Might not everything naturally turn into beauty, were we not
unceasingly interrupting the arduous labours of our soul? Does not
evil itself become precious so soon as it has gathered therefrom the
deep lying diamond of repentance? The acts of injustice whereof you
have been guilty, the tears you have caused to flow, will not these
end too by becoming so much radiance and love in your soul? Have you
ever cast your eyes into this kingdom of purifying flame that is
within you? Perhaps a great wrong may have been done you to-day, the
act itself being mean and disheartening, the mode of action of the
basest, and ugliness wrapped you round as your tears fell. But let
some years elapse, then give one look into your soul, and tell me
whether, beneath the recollection of that act, you see not something
that is already purer than thought; an indescribable, unnameable force
that has nought in common with the forces of this world; a mysterious
inexhaustible spring of the other life, whereat you may drink for the
rest of your days. And yet will you have rendered no assistance to
the untiring queen; other thoughts will have filled your mind, and it
will be without your knowledge that the act will have been purified
in the silence of your being, and will have flown into the precious
waters that lie in the great reservoir of truth and beauty, which,
unlike the shallower reservoir of true or beautiful thoughts, has an
ever unruffled surface, and remains for all time out of reach of the
breath of life. Emerson tells us that there is not an act or event in
our life but, sooner or later, casts off its outer shell, and bewilders
us by its sudden flight, from the very depths of us, on high into the
empyrean. And this is true to a far greater extent than Emerson had
foreseen, for the further we advance in these regions, the diviner are
the spheres we discover.

We can form no adequate conception of what this silent activity of
the souls that surround us may really mean. Perhaps you have spoken a
pure word to one of your fellows by whom it has not been understood.
You look upon it as lost and dismiss it from your mind. But one day,
peradventure, the word comes up again extraordinarily transformed,
and revealing the unexpected fruit it has borne in the darkness;
then silence once more falls over all. But it matters not; we have
learned that nothing can be lost in the soul, and that even to the
very pettiest there come moments of splendour. It is unmistakably
borne home to us that even the unhappiest and the most destitute of
men have at the depths of their being and in spite of themselves a
treasure of beauty that they cannot despoil. They have but to acquire
the habit of dipping into this treasure. It suffices not that beauty
should keep solitary festival in life; it has to become a festival of
every day. There needs no great effort to be admitted into the ranks
of those ‘whose eyes no longer behold earth in flower and sky in glory
in infinitesimal fragments, but indeed in sublime masses,’ and I speak
here of flowers and sky that are purer and more lasting than those that
we behold. Thousands of channels there are through which the beauty
of our soul may sail even unto our thoughts. Above all is there the
wonderful, central channel of love.

Is it not in love that are found the purest elements of beauty that we
can offer to the soul? Some there are who do thus in beauty love each
other. And to love thus means that, little by little, the sense of
ugliness is lost; that one’s eyes are closed to all the littlenesses
of life, to all but the freshness and virginity of the very humblest
of souls. Loving thus, we have no longer even the need to forgive.
Loving thus, we can no longer have anything to conceal, for that the
ever-present soul transforms all things into beauty. It is to behold
evil in so far only as it purifies indulgence, and teaches us no longer
to confound the sinner with his sin. Loving thus do we raise on high
within ourselves all those about us who have attained an eminence
where failure has become impossible; heights whence a paltry action
has so far to fall that, touching earth, it is compelled to yield up
its diamond soul. It is to transform, though all unconsciously, the
feeblest intention that hovers about us into illimitable movement. It
is to summon all that is beautiful in earth, heaven or soul, to the
banquet of love. Loving thus, we do indeed exist before our fellows as
we exist before God. It means that the least gesture will call forth
the presence of the soul with all its treasure. No longer is there need
of death, disaster or tears for that the soul shall appear; a smile
suffices. Loving thus, we perceive truth in happiness as profoundly as
some of the heroes perceived it in the radiance of greatest sorrow. It
means that the beauty that turns into love is undistinguishable from
the love that turns into beauty. It means to be able no longer to
tell where the ray of a star leaves off and the kiss of an ordinary
thought begins. It means to have come so near to God that the angels
possess us. Loving thus, the same soul will have been so beautified
by us all that it will become, little by little, the ‘unique angel’
mentioned by Swedenborg. It means that each day will reveal to us a
new beauty in that mysterious angel, and that we shall walk together
in a goodness that shall ever become more and more living, loftier
and loftier. For there exists also a lifeless beauty, made up of the
past alone; but the veritable love renders the past useless, and its
approach creates a boundless future of goodness, without disaster and
without tears. To love thus is but to free one’s soul, and to become
as beautiful as the soul thus freed. ‘If, in the emotion that this
spectacle cannot fail to awaken in thee,’ says the great Plotinus, when
dealing with kindred matters—and of all the intellects known to me
that of Plotinus draws the nearest to the divine—‘If, in the emotion
that this spectacle cannot fail to awaken in thee, thou proclaimest
not that it is beautiful; and if, plunging thine eyes into thyself,
thou dost not then feel the charm of beauty, it is in vain that, thy
disposition being such, thou shouldst seek the intelligible beauty; for
thou wouldst seek it only with that which is ugly and impure. Therefore
it is that the discourse we hold here is not addressed to all men. But
if thou hast recognised beauty within thyself, see that thou rise to
the recollection of the intelligible beauty.’


                  Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO.
                          Edinburgh & London







End of Project Gutenberg's The Treasure of the Humble, by Maurice Maeterlinck



*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE TREASURE OF THE HUMBLE ***


    

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.


START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
    at www.gutenberg.org. If you
    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
  
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

    • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
        the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
        to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
        Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
        Literary Archive Foundation.”
    
    • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
        works.
    
    • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
        receipt of the work.
    
    • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
        distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
    

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.