The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Great Musicians: Purcell, by William Cummings, Edn. Francis Hueffer.

SAMPSON LOW, MARSTON, SEARLE, & RIVINGTON
CROWN BUILDINGS, 188, FLEET STREET
1881

PREFACE.

The attempt to write a Life of Henry Purcell has been beset with many difficulties. So much information which might have been preserved for the instruction of after times has been lost, either through the indifference or culpable neglect of those who had it in their power to have placed on record details which would have been interesting. Sir John Hawkins and Dr. Burney are particularly open to censure on this head. They possessed many opportunities for gaining authentic knowledge of facts and circumstances now lost for ever. In reading their histories of music we cannot but feel regret that they neglected to gather and garner the stores of Purcellian lore which were so accessible to them, and which they could so easily have rescued from oblivion.

Both Hawkins and Burney had a personal acquaintance with Leveridge, the celebrated bass vocalist and actor, who had been on friendly terms with Purcell, and could have solved many doubts which now perplex the musical student. Leveridge could have supplied very interesting details, which would have enriched the meagre narrations handed down to us respecting the great English musician.

Hawkins was on most intimate terms with the Rev. William Gostling, a minor canon of Canterbury Cathedral, and son of the "wondrous" bass of Purcell's day. The Rev. William Gostling possessed a very extensive library, rich in musical manuscripts, particularly those of Purcell. Miss Hawkins says of him: "Adding his father's recollections to his own, his knowledge of facts in the musical world reached back to the time of King William and Queen Mary, and he talked of Purcell as we do of Arne."

Hawkins not only corresponded with Gostling, but also frequently visited him at Canterbury; and at his decease prepared the catalogue for the sale by [Pg vii] auction, in 1777, of his library. There can be little doubt that Dr. Burney had also a personal acquaintance with the Rev. W. Gostling. I possess a copy of the catalogue before mentioned, which belonged to Burney, and in it he has noted the prices the various lots fetched, himself being the purchaser of several.

Both Hawkins and Burney were well acquainted with Mr. Henry Needler, an eminent musician and violinist, who had been a pupil of Purcell, and resided near St. Clement's Church, in the Strand, where he died in 1760.

Among the mis-statements of Hawkins and Burney may be mentioned the one which has been oft repeated, and caused endless trouble to biographers. They agree in saying Purcell was elected organist of Westminster Abbey at the age of eighteen. An examination of the Abbey records, which Hawkins had access to, would have prevented the promulgation of this error.

Other mis-statements will be dealt with in their proper place. Enough has been said to show that the [Pg viii] recognised musical historians are not to be implicitly relied on when dealing with facts and dates.

My endeavour has been to follow an accurate chronological arrangement; but I am fully sensible that perfection is impossible, and therefore I shall be grateful for corrections of errors, or additional information for future use.

My hope is that this little work may be the fore-runner of other Purcell studies, in which it will be possible to give further details respecting Purcell's ancestry, descendants, and family, and also to say something more of his noteworthy contemporaries and pupils.
WILLIAM H. CUMMINGS.

PURCELL.

Music and poetry attained to a high state of cultivation in the reign of Elizabeth; the Queen herself was an admirable performer on the virginals, and by her example and authority did all that was possible to elevate the art of music, and to encourage learned musicians throughout her dominions. This happy condition of things was continued by her successors, James I. and Charles I., but with the establishment of the Commonwealth all music, both of church and theatre, was rigidly suppressed. We read with horror and indignation of the wanton destruction of church organs and other musical instruments, and of the tearing and burning of the various Service-books which had been in use in the cathedrals and collegiate establishments. At Canterbury cathedral "the soldiers violated the monuments of the dead, spoyled the organs, broke down the ancient rails and seats with the brazen eagle which did support the Bible, forced open the cupboards of the singing-men, rent some of their surplices, gowns, and Bibles, and carryed away others, mangled all our Service-books and books of Common [Pg 2] Prayer, bestrewing the whole pavement with the leaves thereof." At Rochester cathedral, Colonel Sands, hearing the organs, cryed, " A devil on those bag-pipes ," and "one of the rebels" discharged a pistol at the head of Prebend Larken, who interposed and endeavoured to prevent the spoliation of the cathedral. At Chichester cathedral, the officers having sacked the plate and vestments, left the "destructive and spoyling part to be finished by the common soldiers, who brake down the organs, and dashing the pipes with their pole-axes, scoffingly said, ' Hark how the organs go! ' They force open all the locks, either of doors or desks wherein the singing-men laid up their Common Prayer books, their singing-books, their gowns and surplesses; they rent the books in pieces, and scatter the torn leaves all over the church, even to the covering of the pavement." At Winchester "They enter the church with colours flying, their drums beating, their matches fired, and that all might have their part in so horrid an attempt, some of their troops of horse also accompanied them in their march, and rode up through the body of the church and quire until they came to the altar; there they begin their work; they rudely pluck down the table and break the rail, and afterwards carrying it to an ale-house they set it on fire, and in that fire burnt the books of Common Prayer and all the singing-books belonging to the Quire; they throw down the organ and break the stories of the Old and New Testament curiously cut out in carved work. The troopers ride through the streets in surplesses, carrying Common Prayer books and some broken organ pipes."

In Westminster Abbey, in 1643, "Soldiers were quartered who brake down the rail about the altar, and burnt it in the place where it stood; they brake down the organ and pawned the pipes at several ale-houses for pots of ale; they put on some of the singing-men's surplesses, and in contempt of that canonical habit, ran up and down the church; he that wore the surpless was the hare, the rest were the hounds."

It would be needless to add to these miserable stories; those who care to read further on the subject, are referred to the quaint old book Mercurius Rusticus , from whence the foregoing extracts have been taken.

So complete was the destruction of church music-books, that examples of the pre-Commonwealth time are now most rare.

Not only were the organs and music destroyed, but musicians, organists, and singers were turned adrift, and had to seek precarious livelihoods by teaching music to the few who cared or were willing to learn the art, or else to escape starvation by adopting some less congenial occupation than that for which they were fitted by nature and education.

If tradition may be relied on, the Protector, Cromwell, was himself a lover of music, and not unwilling, when opportunity served, to assist and befriend musicians.

Cromwell's secretary, the poet Milton, was no mean performer on the organ, and being the son of an eminent composer, [1] would doubtless, with his passionate [Pg 4] love for music, be at all times ready to use his sympathetic voice and counsel on behalf of any distressed and poor musician who might petition the Protector for help or redress.

It is well known that the organ which stood in Magdalen College, Oxford, was saved from destruction through the intervention of Cromwell, who privately caused it to be removed to Hampton Court, where it was placed in the great gallery, in order that he might have the frequent pleasure of hearing it; and he also appointed as his organist and music-master, at a salary of 100 l. per annum, John Hingston, who had been one of the musicians to Charles I. Cromwell was extremely partial to the Latin Motets composed by Richard Dering, and these were performed on the organ by Hingston, who was assisted by his pupils in the vocal parts. The interesting organ which must have often poured forth its sweet sounds under the fingers of Milton, was, after the Protector's death, returned to Magdalen College; but subsequently the College authorities sold it, and it was removed to Tewkesbury Abbey, where it now stands.

Anthony Wood, who lived during the Protectorate, tells the following characteristic anecdote of Cromwell:—

It must not be forgotten that although during the Commonwealth musicians found it difficult to earn their bread in consequence of the prohibition of all public exhibition of their executive skill, yet many of the learned and erudite musical treatises which have been handed down to us were published at that time. From this we may be sure that the musical predilections of Cromwell were regarded with secret hope by the few musicians who were able privately to pursue their calling; and indeed public signs were not wanting during the latter years of the Protector's life, that had he been spared, the art of music would probably have received more emphatic and distinct assistance [Pg 6] at his hands. In 1656 he granted a licence to Sir William Davenant to open a kind of theatre [2] for "an entertainment in declamation and music after the manner of the ancients;" and later on he licensed certain theatrical performances at the Cockpit, in Drury Lane.

The extreme Puritan party did, however, so effectually destroy and put down all Church music, [3] deeming organs and service-books superstitious and ungodly, that at the Restoration, when the authorities set about re-establishing musical services in the cathedrals, it was impossible to find either instruments, books, or singers necessary for the purpose; and, indeed, out of the large musical establishment of Charles I., only three men—Dr. Wilson, Christopher Gibbons, and Henry Lawes—came forward at the Restoration to claim their former appointments.

We get a further insight into the condition of Church music at the Restoration, from Matthew Locke's Present Practice of Musick Vindicated , published in 1673, wherein he says, "For above a year after the opening of His Majestie's Chappel, the orderers of the musick there were necessitated to supply superior parts of the music with cornets and men's feigned voices, there being not one lad for all that time capable of singing his part readily."

An examination of the old MS. copies of anthems composed by the organists and singing-men of the various cathedrals in the reign of Charles II., shows that a dearth of singing-boys (trebles) was general throughout the kingdom, the compositions being chiefly for men's voices only.

From the preceding slight and brief sketch of the state of music during the Commonwealth, it will be evident that the Puritan rule was most unpropitious for the art; with its professors banned, and its public performance well-nigh extinguished, music might perhaps have been expected to have died an unnatural death; but heaven-born, it retained a vital spark which needed only the breath of freedom and gentle encouragement to foster it into a flame.

With the death of Cromwell, the sun of the Puritan world vanished, but happily at the same time a new star in the musical firmament arose. Cromwell died in 1658, at Whitehall, and in the same year, within a bow-shot of the Palace, was born the favoured child of the muses, destined to raise the musical fame of England to a height it had never before attained, and by his beautiful creations to make for himself a name of undying fame.

This welcome prodigy was Henry Purcell, his birth-place St. Ann's Lane, Old Pye Street, Westminster. The precise day of his birth there is unknown, but there is no doubt about the year 1658. Some remains of the house are still standing. A sketch of it and the adjoining premises was made on the 15th of April, 1845, by R. W. Withall.

The original drawing, of which a reduced copy is given, has the following note:—

Purcell was named Henry after his father, a thoroughly competent and efficient musician, of whom Pepys made this quaint entry in his diary on the 21st of February, 1659:—

We may note here the intimacy which existed between Purcell's father and Matthew Locke, [4] the celebrated composer, an intimacy and friendship which was afterwards extended to the son.

Henry Purcell, senior, was a gentleman of the Chapel Royal, and in that capacity sang in the choir at the coronation of Charles II. [5] He was also elected a singing-man of Westminster Abbey, and master of the [Pg 10] chorister boys of that church; to these appointments he added that of music copyist of Westminster Abbey, at that time a very honourable and important position, in consequence of the wholesale destruction of Service-books which had taken place during the Commonwealth.

A very interesting official document, now preserved in the British Museum, of which the following is a copy, gives us information respecting the appointments held by Henry Purcell, the father, in Westminster Abbey:—

In addition to the before-mentioned appointments at the Chapel Royal and Westminster Abbey held by Purcell, senior, we find that he was also a member of the Royal band. The old cheque-book of the Chapel Royal in recording his death places the matter beyond doubt:—

It is clear from the foregoing account of the numerous important musical posts which the father held, that he was a man of considerable ability, and fully equal to the task of guiding and fostering the musical predilections of his infant son; and there can be no doubt that Henry Purcell received his earliest instructions in the art of music from his father. When the latter died he was buried in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey; his age has not been ascertained, but presumably he was but a young man—perhaps he was naturally weak in constitution—and from him the boy Henry may have inherited the seeds of consumption. The elder Purcell died in 1664, at which time the young Henry was just six years old, and with his natural genius he had doubtless already acquired some considerable skill in music. It is certain that he was immediately admitted [Pg 13] as a chorister of the Chapel Royal. Happily for him he had been left by his father to the guardianship of his uncle Thomas Purcell, who most warmly and affectionately endeavoured to supply the place of the lost parent by adopting the orphan as his own son.

Thomas Purcell's abilities and professional qualifications well fitted him for the task which had fallen to his lot. He was a gentleman of the Chapel Royal and had been associated with his brother Henry at the coronation of Charles II.; he must have been held in high favour and regard by the king, for court appointments in various musical capacities fell to him in rapid succession. Amongst other honourable positions we find him holding the post of lutenist as described in the following warrant:—

In 1672 Thomas Purcell was appointed a "composer in ordinary for the violins" in conjunction with Pelham Humphries, the warrant which is extremely curious runs thus:—

Thomas Purcell and Pelham Humphries were also associated as masters of the King's band of "four-and-twenty fiddlers;" but Purcell was chief and leader, either by virtue of seniority or special appointment.

A curious document in Thomas Purcell's autograph is preserved by the "Royal Society of Musicians," which gives the names of the gentlemen of the band and other interesting particulars; it reads as follows:—

In the original of the foregoing document the Christian names were evidently prefixed after the list had been written out; the spelling of the surnames is curious; Stagins, father and son are spelt differently; another proof, if it were required, of the utter indifference to such matters at that period.

Pepys in his Diary (Dec. 19, 1666) made an entry that [Pg 16] "many of the musique are ready to starve, they being five years behindhand for their wages." This irregularity of payment of the "King's musique" seems to have continued, for we find in the accounts of the "Treasurer of the Chamber," the following record:—

Thomas Purcell was evidently a popular man, and on the 24th of June, 1672, he was elected "Marshall of the Corporation of Musique in Westminster," in room of Captain Cooke, [10] who resigned "by reason of sicknesse." Two years later he received another court appointment from the King; a state paper preserved in the Record Office tells us that he succeeded "John Wilson, deceased, to hold during His Majesty's pleasure, with the fee of £20 per annum, payable quarterly out of the Exchequer, to commence 25th March, 1674," subscribed by warrant from the Earl of Burlington, Master of His Majesty's Household.

Another warrant under the signet gives an order to the treasurer of the chamber for the time being, "to pay unto Thomas Purcell (one of His Majesty's Musicians in Ordinary, in the place of Dr. John Wilson, deceased), the wages and fee of £20 by the day, and £16 2 s. 6 d. yearly for a livery, payable quarterly, from Lady-day 1674, and to continue during His Majesty's pleasure."

Thomas Purcell lived till 1682, so that he had the satisfaction of witnessing the extraordinary development of his nephew's genius, and could also rejoice to see the general recognition of his merits, and of the honourable rewards he was so rapidly acquiring. When, at last, full of years and honours, Thomas departed this life, he was buried near his brother in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey. We seek in vain for the musical compositions of either Henry (the elder) or of Thomas: with the exception of a few chants in common use in our cathedrals, nothing of their work remains to us.

When Henry Purcell, the younger, became a chorister in the Chapel Royal at six years of age, the master of the boys was Captain Henry Cooke, an old musician, who had belonged to the chapel of Charles I., but who, on the breaking out of civil war, had laid aside the peaceful art of music to engage in the rough dissonances of battle and strife, and changed his service from that of a Royal musician to become a Royalist soldier. In the latter capacity he won a captain's commission, and possibly it was not less as a reward for his devotion and bravery on behalf of his king than as a recognition of his musical ability that Charles II. appointed him "Master of the Children of the Chapel." That he was well qualified for the post can be shown by reference to the opinions of his contemporaries, and also to the numerous compositions of his still extant in manuscript.

Cooke composed a considerable number of pieces of music for various royal and festal occasions; one curious hymn for a ceremony in connection with a festival service of the Knights of the Garter at Windsor was accompanied by "two double sackbuts and two double courtals placed at convenient distances among the classes of the gentlemen of both choirs, to the end that all might distinctly hear, and consequently keep together both in time and tune; for one sackbut and courtal was placed before the four petty canons who begun the hymn, and the other two immediately before the prebends of the college."

Captain Cooke's services were frequently required on the stage, [11] and with his many accomplishments there is no great wonder that he became conceited. Pepys, from whom so many quotations have already been made, wrote: "A vain coxcomb he is, though he sings so well;" and this charge of vanity is supported by other evidence. A contemporary historian says: "Captain Cooke was the best musician of his time till Mr. Pelham Humphreys, one of the children of the chapel educated by himself, began to rival him, after which he died with great discontent." [12]

Cooke was buried in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey in July, 1672. During the years that he was master of the children of the chapel he had as pupils many who won for themselves distinguished names as [Pg 20] musicians, amongst them notably Pelham Humphreys, Wise, Blow, Turner, and Purcell.

Purcell profited by Captain Cooke's instructions for a period of eight years—from the age of six to that of fourteen, a very important time in the life of a clever boy. Historians seem to have forgotten this fact, and have been disposed to credit the whole of Purcell's musical education to Pelham Humphreys or to Dr. Blow.

During these early years Purcell had already put forth specimens of his talent for musical composition. In 1667 Playford published a little three-part song entitled, "Sweet Tyraness, I now resign," which Dr. Burney has included in his history under the supposition that it was composed by Purcell's father; but there is reason to believe that it was the composition of the boy who, at the date of publication, was nine years of age. Possibly the music was originally intended as an air or song for a single voice, as we find it published in this form in 1678, in a work called New Ayres and Dialogues . This collection contained five other songs by Henry Purcell.

When Purcell was eleven years old, he essayed his powers in the composition of music for a piece called "The Address of the Children of the Chapel Royal to the King, and their Master, Captain Cooke, on his Majesties Birthday, A.D. 1670, composed by Master Purcell, one of the Children of the said Chapel." [13] It is also probable that in this youthful time Purcell composed the music to Macbeth , now commonly associated [Pg 21] with the name of Matthew Locke. That the latter did compose music for Macbeth is certain, as some of it is still in existence, but it does not bear the slightest resemblance to that popularly known as his. In favour of Purcell, it may be noted that the Macbeth music has many Purcell-like touches; that a copy of the score in Purcell's youthful hand is in existence; [14] that many old MS. copies of the music have his name attached as composer; and that he was entitled to the credit of it was believed by Dr. William Hayes, Dr. Philip Hayes, Dr. Arnold, and many other eminent musicians.

The music itself is clearly an elaboration and development of a series of short movements composed by Robert Johnson for Middleton's play of The Witch . [15]

It must not be forgotten that many of Purcell's anthems now in use in our cathedrals were the product of his youthful pen and genius whilst he was still a pupil of Cooke. Captain Cooke, the soldier musician, died, as previously stated, in 1672, and was succeeded in his appointment as "Master of the Children of the Chapel" by one whose nature, genius, and scientific knowledge of music must have stimulated and excited in a special manner the dawning powers of the youthful musical company committed to his charge, and the force of whose example must have proved of the greatest service to Purcell. This man was Pelham Humphreys; [16] he had been educated in the Chapel Royal under Captain Cooke, where his abilities and his personal [Pg 22] attractions made a strong impression on Charles II. In Nov., 1663, Pepys made the following entry in his Diary: "The anthem was good after sermon, being the fifty-first psalme, made for five voices, by one of Captain Cooke's boys—a pretty boy. And they say there are four or five of them that can do as much. And here I first perceived that the king is musicall, and kept good time with his hand all along the anthem."

The pretty boy was undoubtedly Pelham Humphreys. Clifford's book of anthems, published in 1664, the year after the incident just recorded, contains the words of five anthems, "composed by Pelham Humphrey, one of the Children of His Majesties Chappel;" and in Boyce's Cathedral Music we find Humphreys' anthem, "Have mercy upon me," the words of which are taken from the fifty-first psalm. There can be little doubt, therefore, that this was the very anthem heard and approved by Pepys.

In 1664 the king sent Humphreys to Paris, [17] to study under Lully; and he also probably went to Italy. During his absence the king gave him an appointment as one of the Gentlemen of the Chapel Royal; and on his return to London in October, 1667, he was "sworn in" to the place. He speedily produced several new compositions, sacred and secular, by command of the king.

Pepys' entry in his Diary for November 15, 1667, is very quaint. He says, "Home, and there find, as I expected, Mr. Cæsar and little Pelham Humphreys, lately returned from France, and is an absolute Monsieur, as full of form and confidence and vanity, and disparages everything and everybody's skill but his own. But to hear how he laughs at all the king's musick here, at Blagrave and others, that they cannot keep time or tune, nor understand anything: and at Grebus, [18] the Frenchman, the king's master of musick, how he understands nothing, nor can play on any instrument, and so cannot compose: and that he will give him a lift out of his place, and that he and the king are mighty great." On the following day, the 16th, Pepys notes that there was a performance of Pelham Humphreys' musick given before the king at Whitehall.

That Humphreys was an admirable musician, possessed of uncommon genius, is easily discernible from the numerous compositions of his which have come down to us. He took as his models Lulli and Carissimi; but fortunately Purcell's genius was stronger and more emphatic than that of his master: had it been otherwise he would have become a mere copyist; but, as we shall hereafter see, Purcell looked to Italy for good musical models, and was not afraid to express his dislike to the frivolity of the French school.

There exists a very interesting manuscript anthem in Purcell's handwriting, which was originally composed [Pg 24] by Humphreys, but afterwards altered and improved by Purcell.

Poor Humphreys had but a short career, or we may be sure he would have accomplished greater things than he did. Two years before he died he married a very beautiful lady, who followed him to his grave in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey in 1674, he being only twenty-seven years of age.

Purcell was then sixteen years old, and his boy-soprano voice must have been near its breaking—perhaps it had already departed. It was, however, the good custom of the period to retain as supernumeraries of the King's Chapel any of the old boys who gave evidence of musical ability. In 1666 we find "Hen. Cooke, Thomas Purcell, and other Gentlemen of the Chapel Royal, petition on behalf of themselves, the pages of the chapel, and boys whose voices have changed , for payment, there being no money assigned to the treasurer of the chamber for those purposes."

Purcell therefore continued attached to the Chapel Royal, and became a pupil of Dr. John Blow, the successor to Pelham Humphreys, as "Master of the Children." That Purcell studied under Blow is certain from the inscription on Blow's monument in Westminster Abbey, where it is stated that he was "master to the famous Henry Purcell." Blow was undoubtedly the very master Purcell then needed, for he was eminent for his goodness, amiability, and moral character, and combined with those excellent qualities all the learning and experience of a sound musician. His compositions are remarkable for their melodies and the boldness of [Pg 25] their harmonical progressions. [19] He held appointments at the Chapel Royal, Westminster Abbey, St. Paul's Cathedral, and St. Margaret's, Westminster; and it speaks strongly for his singleness of heart, and the total absence of envy and jealousy in his nature, that recognising and proclaiming the remarkable abilities of his pupils, Purcell and Jeremiah Clarke, he resigned his appointments at Westminster Abbey and St. Paul's Cathedral, in order that they might occupy those prominent and advantageous positions. This estimable man, Blow, survived his dear friend and pupil, Purcell, some years, and so became his successor at Westminster Abbey, and was eventually laid in a grave close to him, nearly beneath the organ where they had so often discoursed sweet music together.

That Blow fully estimated the genius of his pupil Purcell, there can be no doubt, since many manuscript copies of the compositions of the latter exist in the handwriting of Blow. Probably it was at the suggestion of Blow that Purcell was appointed copyist [20] to Westminster Abbey in 1676. He succeeded the Rev. Stephen Byng, one of the minor canons, who probably resigned the post, as he did not die till 1681. Purcell was eighteen years of age when he became copyist of Westminster Abbey; hence arose the mistake made by [Pg 26] Burney and Hawkins, and constantly repeated on their authority, that Purcell was appointed organist of Westminster Abbey at eighteen. The office of copyist he held for two years only.

Mention has previously been made of the music to Macbeth as the composition of Purcell; probably the recognition of the excellence and effectiveness of this work induced the managers of the theatres to give him further employment; for in 1676 we find him composing music for at least three plays—Shadwell's Epsom-Wells , Dryden's Aurenge-Zebe , and Shadwell's Libertine . The latter contains a four-part chorus, "In these delightful, pleasant groves," still popular with choral societies. The whole of the music of The Libertine is very bold, and would be an interesting work to revive for its merits; it is further curious from the fact that the libretto is founded on the same story which was long years afterwards adopted by Mozart for his opera, Don Giovanni . In 1677 Purcell wrote the music for Mrs. Behn's tragedy, Abdelazor , and also the music, solo and chorus, of an ode "On the death of his Worthy Friend, Mr. Matthew Locke, musick composer in ordinary to His Majesty, and Organist of Her Majesties Chappel, who Dyed in August 1677." The words of the ode are as follow:—

Of the intimacy which existed between Locke and the Purcell family we had some indication in the paragraph previously quoted from Pepys, where he spoke of Purcell's father; and that the son was on similarly friendly terms with Locke is certain. Locke lived in the Savoy, and from thence he penned the following letter [21] to Purcell:—

In 1678 Purcell resigned his appointment of Copyist at Westminster Abbey, [22] doubtless that he might devote more time to study and composition. In this year he [Pg 28] produced the fine music for the masque in Shadwell's mutilation of Shakespeare's Timon of Athens .

In 1679 Purcell does not appear to have composed music for the theatres, but that he was deeply engrossed in his favourite occupation appears from the following very curious letter, now printed for the first time:—

The Rev. John Gostling, M.A., to whom the letter is addressed, was at the time a Minor Canon of Canterbury Cathedral, and was celebrated for the quality and extraordinary compass of his bass voice. It was especially for him that most of the bass solos in Purcell's anthems were written. Evelyn, in his Diary (January 1685,) speaks of that "stupendous bass, Gosling" singing before his Majesty and the Duke.

We learn from the above interesting letter that Thomas Purcell called Henry his son , and we can estimate his influence with his master, Charles the Second, by the successful way in which he evidently refreshed the king's memory; for only a few days after the letter was written the "Gratious promis" was fulfilled by appointing Gosling to the Chapel Royal. On the 25th of February, ⁹ ⁄ ₇₈ , Mr. John Gosling was sworn "Gentleman of his Ma ^ties Chappel extraordinary," which means that his was a special or supernumerary appointment; but a vacancy in the regular staff of the Chapel occurred almost immediately, and we find the following entry in the cheque-book: "Mr. William Tucker, gent., of his Ma ^ties Chappell Royal, departed this life the 28th day of February, 1678, [24] in whose place was admitted in ordinary Mr. John Gostling, a base from Canterbury, Master of Arts."

The postscript to the letter read in connection with the previous paragraph "my sonne is composing wherin you will be chiefly concern'd" is clearly a jocose reference to Gostling's exceptionally low voice.

Purcell not only wrote double F (F faut) and double [Pg 30] E (E lamy) for him, as in the anthem, "Behold I bring you glad tidings," but in another anthem commencing, "They that go down to the sea in ships," he carried the bass solo part down to double D.

Charles the Second became extremely partial to the [Pg 31] singing of Gostling, and was heard to say, "You may talk as much as you please of your nightingales, but I have a gosling who excels them all." At another time he presented Gostling with a silver egg filled with guineas, saying, "He had heard eggs were good for the voice."

Gostling was a devoted admirer of, and a performer on, the viol da gamba , an instrument which Purcell detested. We can therefore readily imagine that his musical susceptibilities were frequently severely taxed by the persistent practice of his friend. He accordingly composed a round for three voices to the following words, [25] which he presented to Gostling:—

In 1680 Dr. Blow magnanimously resigned the appointment of organist of Westminster Abbey in favour of Purcell, [26] who thus became possessed of one of the most distinguished musical positions in the kingdom at the early age of twenty-two.

In the same year Purcell composed the music for Lee's tragedy, Theodosius, or the Force of Love . It was performed at the Duke's Theatre, and the music of the songs was soon after published by Bently as an Appendix to the play. He also wrote music for D'Urfey's comedy, [Pg 32] The Virtuous Wife , and two odes, the first, addressed to the Duke of York, entitled "An Ode or Welcome Song for his Royal Highness on his Return from Scotland," and the second called "A Song to Welcome Home His Majesty from Windsor."

But the most remarkable work of Purcell in this year (1680) was the composition of the opera Dido and Æneas , usually ascribed to his seventeenth year, 1675, a complete mistake. An original copy of the libretto still exists, with the following title, "An Opera performed at Mr. Josias Priest's Boarding-school at Chelsey, by young gentlewomen, the words made by Mr. Nat. Tate. The musick composed by Mr. Henry Purcell."

That this was the first performance is tolerably certain, for we find in D'Urfey's New Poems , 1690, "An Epilogue to the Opera of Dido and Æneas , performed at Mr. Priest's Boarding-school at Chelsey: spoken by the Lady Dorothy Burk." We know that Priest removed to Chelsey in 1680 by an advertisement in the London Gazette , November 25th, 1680: "Josias Priest, dancing-master, who kept a boarding-school of gentlewomen in Leicester-fields, is removed to the great school-house at Chelsey, that was Mr. Portman's. There will continue the same masters and others to the improvement of the said school."

Dido and Æneas will always remain a monument to Purcell's extraordinary genius; it is in perfect opera form, with an entire absence of dialogue, the whole of the libretto being set in recitative, solos, duets, and chorus. The opera is short, yet we cannot but recognise the fact that had there been a public [Pg 33] demand for absolute music-drama, or even a proper appreciation of a work cast in such a mould, the composer had arisen who possessed the necessary genius, inspiration, and feeling for building up a school of opera which would have proved a model for his own and succeeding generations, but the time was not ripe for such a development. Purcell, like many other gifted mortals, lived before his time, and thus his perfect specimen of music-drama remains unique: so far as we know he never attempted such another work.

There is a tradition that the part of Belinda (or Anna), written for alto voice, was sung and acted [27] by Purcell himself. The music of this opera remained in MS. until 1840, when it was published by the "Musical Antiquarian Society," edited by G. A. Macfarren, unfortunately from an imperfect copy of the score, the only one then attainable. It has been frequently performed since Purcell's time, notably at the "Ancient Concerts" in London, and more recently at Liverpool. In this eventful year, or the succeeding one, 1681, Purcell took unto himself a wife, and in the latter year he again composed an ode or "Welcome Song" which must have brought him favourably under the notice of the King. It commences, "Swifter Isis, swifter flow."

In July, 1682, his abilities were publicly recognised by giving him the appointment of Organist of the Chapel Royal in place of Edward Lowe, deceased. The honour [Pg 34] and the additional income would be welcomed by the young couple just starting on the voyage of life as a favourable augury for their future comfort and prosperity.

In this same year Purcell wrote music for a grand civic festival, "The inauguration of the truly loyal and right honourable Sir William Prichard, Knight, lord Mayor of the city of London, president of the honourable Artillery Company, and a member of the worshipful company of Merchant-Taylors. Perform'd on Monday, September xxx. 1682." In the following month he composed another "Ode or Welcome Song to the King on his return from Newmarket, Oct. 21."

The old uncle, Thomas Purcell, must have been well pleased to witness his adopted son's happiness and success; of the intercourse and friendship which continued to exist between them we have evidence. When Thomas became too old to go himself to the Pay-office for his salaries he executed a power of attorney authorizing his son Matthew to act for him, and this document was witnessed by Frances Purcell—Henry's wife.

The quaint deed is worthy of reproduction here. [28] The original is in my possession.

A few months afterwards, July 31st, 1682, the old man died, and on the 2nd of August his mortal remains were laid to rest in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey. We can easily imagine the grief of Purcell who had to mourn the loss of one who had been more than a father to him.

A few days after the funeral of the uncle Thomas, Purcell had occasion to rejoice in the birth of a son and heir; the child was baptized in Westminster Abbey, receiving the names of John Baptista, probably a mark of friendly regard for the well-known musician, John Baptist Draghi, [29] but the infant survived only a few [Pg 36] months and was buried with his kindred in the Abbey cloisters. There is a volume of music in the handwriting of Henry Purcell in the Fitzwilliam Library at Cambridge, containing an entry which is worthy of note in this place as showing the serious tone of his mind at that period: at the end of an anthem he has written, "God bless Mr. Henry Purcell. September y ^e 10th, 1682."

In the following year Purcell ventured on his first publication, for which he solicited subscribers. His prospectus or proposals are lost, but the following advertisement from the London Gazette , May 24th, 1683, throws much light on the subject:—

Again on the following June the 7th, another advertisement appeared in the London Gazette :—

Judging by the extreme rarity of the work, the subscription list must have been a poor one, and as the price charged was only ten shillings for the completed work, Purcell must have been considerably out of pocket, when he came to balance his accounts after paying the engraver and printer; the former was the celebrated copper-plate engraver, Thomas Cross, junior. The title of the work reads thus: "Sonnata's of III parts. Two Viollins and Basse to the Organ or Harpsichord. Composed by Henry Purcell, Composer in Ordinary to his Most sacred Majesty, and Organist of his Chappell Royall, London. Printed for the Author, and sold by J. Playford and J. Carr at the Temple, Fleet St. 1683."

The sonatas are printed in four separate parts for the instruments named, but there is no score, the first violin part is embellished with a splendid portrait of the composer, lettered "Vera Effigies Henrici Purcell, Atat Suæ 24."

The modest preface is interesting from its reference to the novel use of Italian terms, and also as showing the comparative regard in which Italian and French music was held by the author, who writes:—

The foregoing preface is eminently characteristic of the unassuming and retiring disposition of Purcell. The sonatas have never been printed in score, but a few masterly movements selected from the parts and reduced for the pianoforte are inserted in Dr. Crotch's specimens of ancient music; a perusal of these will whet the appetite for more music of such sterling quality.

This year, 1683, was a prolific one with Purcell, for we find that he composed another "Ode, or Welcome Song for the King," commencing, "Fly bold rebellion," and also an ode to celebrate the marriage of George, [Pg 40] Prince of Denmark, with the Princess Anne, afterwards Queen. The marriage took place in July. The words of the ode commence, "From hardy climes." A large manuscript volume entirely in Purcell's hand, is still in existence, which shows that he had been busy from June, 1680, to February, 1683, in composing Fantasias in three, four, five, six, seven, and eight parts; the book in which these are written was evidently the commencement of what was intended to be a complete and lasting record of the composer's works, and perhaps it was intended for presentation to the King.

The publication of the sonatas was soon followed by another entitled, "A musical entertainment perform'd on November xxii. 1683; it being the festival of St. Cecilia, a great Patroness of Music, whose Memory is annually honoured by a Public Feast made on that day by the Masters and lovers of Music as well in England as in foreign parts. London: Printed by J. Playford, junior, and are to be sold by John Playford near the Temple Church, and John Carr, at the Middle Temple Gate, 1684."

The book, unlike the sonatas, which were beautifully engraven, is a wretched specimen of type-printing, and copies of it are now very rare. The Preface was addressed,

The music consists of an introductory symphony, choruses, and soli, with accompaniments for strings, and has a very novel termination to the words "Iô Cecilia." The words are poor, and were written by Christopher Fishbourne, [30] who seems to have been both a poet and a musician, but of no great pretension in either art. Purcell's enthusiasm and industry are well exemplified by the amount of music which he wrote for the first public observance of St. Cecilia's Day in this country. In addition to the ode already mentioned as published, he composed two other odes, one in English and one in Latin; the former is remarkable for being scored without any part for the tenor violin, and without parts for counter-tenor voices, although the latter voice was in great favour in Purcell's day, and his music generally abounds with solos for that voice. The Latin ode is interesting as being scored for three men's voices with accompaniments for two violins and bass. Both these odes remain at present in manuscript. The Fitzwilliam Library at Cambridge possesses a large volume of manuscript music in the handwriting of Dr. Blow, and internal evidence shows that it must have been completed in 1683; it contains the following anthems by [Pg 42] Purcell:—1. "By the Waters of Babylon;" 2. "O God Thou hast cast us out;" 3. "Remember not, Lord, our Offences;" 4. "I will Sing unto the Lord;" 5. "Blessed be the Lord my Strength;" 6. "O Lord, our Governour;" 7. "Let God Arise;" 8. "Blessed is He;" 9. "Hear me, O Lord;" 10. "Bow down Thine Ear;" 11. "Jerusalem is Built;" 12. "My Beloved Spake;" 13. "O God, Thou art my God;" 14. "Lord, who can tell?" 15. "Benedicite" in B ♭.

The year 1684 is notable for the remarkable organ competition at the Temple Church, in which the two great organ-builders of the day, Father Smith and Renatus Harris, exhibited their skill by erecting rival organs for the approval of the benchers of the Temple, and which eventually resulted in the selection and retention of the splendid instrument built by Smith. The organ then chosen is still standing in the church, and eloquently proclaims the fame of its builder. How far Smith's success was due to the judicious choice he made of organists to show off the qualities and varieties of his stops, it is only possible now to guess, but certainly no more skilful performers could have been found than Dr. Blow and Henry Purcell. Smith's rival, Harris, was also fortunate in obtaining the services of John Baptist Draghi, the friend of Purcell previously mentioned, and whose skill and popularity as an organist contemporary records frequently mention. Smith's organ had the singular advantage of possessing keys for two extra quarter-tones in each octave, which enabled the performer to use distinct pitches or sounds for G sharp and A flat, and also for D sharp and E flat. Those who are familiar with Purcell's sacred music [Pg 43] will readily understand what use he would have made of these additional facilities for modulating into remote keys. In his anthems he frequently wrote chords which must have sounded most crude and harsh on all the keyed instruments of his day, tuned as they were on unequal temperament. Purcell, we know, was on very intimate terms with Smith, who was not only an organ-builder, but also an organist, [31] and it is quite probable that it was at Purcell's suggestion that he added the quarter-tones which constituted so remarkable a feature in the Temple organ. In 1684 Purcell composed yet another "Ode, or Welcome Song, on the King's return to Whitehall after his summer's progress;" the words, commencing, "From these serene and rapturous joys," were written by Thomas Flatman.

In 1685 Purcell was actively concerned in superintending the erection of an organ in Westminster Abbey expressly for the coronation of James II. and his queen. On April 23rd he was paid the sum of 34 l. 12 s. for his services out of the "secret service money." This organ was evidently a small instrument erected just behind the seats occupied by the "King's Choir of Vocal Music," who sat in a gallery in front of and under a south chancel arch, the second from the transept, whilst opposite them, in a similar gallery, were placed the "King's Instrumental Musick." For the coronation service Purcell produced two anthems, "I was Glad," and "My Heart is Inditing," but it would seem that he did not officiate at the organ, for we find that "Purcell, Blow, Child, and Staggins," sang with the basses in the choir on that occasion.

In this same year he composed an ode in honour of King James, commencing, "Why are all the Muses mute?" and it is very likely that he also composed the music for the tragedy of Circe at or about this period. This play, the work of Charles Davenant, when first produced, was accompanied by music from the pen of John Banister, [32] some of which was published in 1679.

A few years since Dr. Rimbault unfortunately published a portion of Purcell's music to Circe with Banister's name attached as the composer, [33] but he afterwards discovered the error he had fallen into. [34] Circe is one of Purcell's best dramatic works, and contains music which no other composer of his time could have written; it still remains in manuscript. Only music to the first act is now to be found. Perhaps Purcell never completed it.

In 1686 Purcell was again afflicted by the death of a child who had been christened Thomas in remembrance of the deceased uncle. The infant was buried in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey. In this year Purcell composed the music for Dryden's tragedy, Tyrannic Love , in which there are several effective and elegant pieces, notably "Hark, my Daridear," a duet, and "Ah, how sweet it is to love," a song. In addition to this, he wrote another "Ode, or Welcome Song for the King," commencing, "Ye tuneful Muses."

In 1687 Purcell had another son born who was [Pg 45] named Henry, but he survived only two months, and was buried with his kindred in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey. Purcell composed another "Ode in honour of King James," commencing "Sound the trumpet, beat the drum," in which occurs a duet to the words, "Let Cæsar and Urania live;" this became so great a favourite that succeeding composers were wont to insert it in their own royal birthday odes. This practice continued till the close of the succeeding century.

About this time Purcell composed a "March" and a "Quickstep," which soon became popular and familiar to the soldiers; a short time afterward some one, probably Lord Wharton, the Irish Viceroy, with much foresight and wisdom, selected the tune of the "Quickstep" as a vehicle for making known the absurd verses of the song called "Lillibullero." Thanks to the music, the song spread like wildfire, with the result described by Bishop Burnet, who says, "A foolish ballad was made at that time, treating the Papists, and chiefly the Irish, in a very ridiculous manner, which had a burden said to be Irish words, 'Lero, lero, lillibullero,' that made an impression on the army that cannot be imagined by those that saw it not. The whole army, and at last the people, both in city and country, were singing it perpetually, and perhaps never had so slight a thing so great an effect." The Viceroy "boasted that the song had sung a deluded Prince out of the three kingdoms." Other testimony speaks of the song "having contributed not a little towards the great Revolution of 1688."

The earliest existing printed copies of these tunes [Pg 46] are dated 1686, but he reprinted the "Quickstep" in 1689, under the title of "A new Irish tune," in a work called Musick's Handmaid for the Virginals or Harpsichord ; and he again used the tune as a ground-bass to a piece of incidental music in the play of The Gordian Knot Unty'd . The music of "Lillibullero" remains in use to this day in the north of Ireland as a political and party tune, but its use is discontinued by our military bands out of respect for the feelings of our Irish Roman Catholic brethren.

In 1687 Henry Playford published A Pastoral Elegy on the Death of Mr. John Playford, the Words by Mr. Tate, set to Musick by Mr. Henry Purcell . It has commonly been believed that this was an elegy on "honest John," as he was familiarly called, but in truth it was in memory of the youngest son of the celebrated old publisher. We have no particulars of his death, but judging from the words of the elegy it must have occurred suddenly:—

This John Playford was only twenty-one years of age when he died; he had commenced business as a music publisher, and would seem to have been remarkable for amiability and piety.

In January, 1688, Purcell, by virtue of his office as "composer in ordinary to his Majesty," received instructions from the King, James II., to compose an anthem to be performed at the Chapel Royal on the 25th of that month, a day which was commanded to [Pg 47] be observed as a general thanksgiving in London and twelve miles round, in consequence of the supposed pregnancy of the Queen. As news travelled but slowly in those days, places beyond the radius named were commanded to keep the 29th as a day of joyful thanksgiving. For the occasion Purcell wrote the anthem commencing, "Blessed are they that fear the Lord;" it is scored for the usual solo voices and chorus, with accompaniments for the organ and quartet of strings.

In May, 1688, Purcell had a daughter born; she was baptized in Westminster Abbey, receiving the name of Frances. This child attained to years of maturity, surviving both her father and her mother.

This year was a troublous one; the political horizon was black, and the national fortunes were in great jeopardy, people had small time or inclination for public amusements, but Purcell contributed music for at least one play, The Fool's Preferment, or the Three Dukes of Dunstable , a comedy by D'Urfey. The songs were sung by William Mountford, who, Colley Cibber says, [35] "sung a clear counter-tenor, and had a melodious warbling throat." "His voice was clear, full, and melodious."

Mountford was a great favourite with the public as an actor and singer, and he was also a dramatic author, but his career was brought to an untimely end in his thirty-third year by Lord Mohun and Captain Hill, who murdered him in revenge for the part he took in preventing the abduction of the celebrated actress, Mrs. Bracegirdle.

The songs in the Fool's Preferment , were published with the play soon after its production at the Queen's Theatre in Dorset Gardens, the title partly reads "together with all the songs and notes to 'em. Excellently compos'd by Mr. Henry Purcell." Purcell still continued composing for the church; an anthem, "The Lord is King," bearing date 1688. He also composed one more "Ode or Welcome Song" for James II.; the last music he had occasion to pen for this King.

Curiously we find that Purcell again became Copyist of Westminster Abbey in this year; he succeeded Charles Taylour, but for what reason has not been discovered. No information respecting Taylour can now be found.

In December the unhappy monarch, James II., fled from his throne and kingdom, and was succeeded by William and Mary, who were crowned at Westminster Abbey in 1689, and in connection with that event a curious story is told by Hawkins:— [36]

The above account in Sir John Hawkins's hand is now lying before me with a note that it is to be inserted in vol. iv. p. 497; it fills two pages of letter paper, and on the third page of the same sheet is a further note by Dr. Benjamin Cooke, which certainly ought to have been printed with the foregoing:—

Whatever may have been the end of this dispute, it probably was speedily concluded, for we find by the Abbey registers of the 6th September following, that Purcell had an infant son baptized in the Abbey, who received the name of Edward; this child survived his parents and became an organist of some note.

On the 5th of August, 1689, a new ode by Purcell, called "A Welcome Song at the Prince of Denmark's Coming Home," and commencing, "Celestial music," was performed at Mr. Maidwell's, a schoolmaster. In commemoration of the accession of William and Mary, Tom D'Urfey prepared an ode abounding in praise of "The Great Nassau." This Purcell set to music, and it was subsequently performed at a cost of £100 in the "Merchant Taylors' Hall," at the gathering of the natives of the County of York at their feast, March 27th, 1690; from which circumstance the ode is known as "The Yorkshire Feast Song." The music became extremely popular; portions of it were printed in the Orpheus Britannicus , and other collections, and the entire work was printed by Goodison in 1788 or 1789, [Pg 51] but in a very incorrect fashion. It has lately been published in a very satisfactory manner by the new "Purcell Society."

In the year 1690 Purcell must have worked assiduously for the theatres; we can trace to this period the production of The Tempest , an alteration from Shakespeare by Shadwell; The Prophetess , or Dioclesian , an adaptation from Beaumont and Fletcher by Betterton; the Massacre of Paris , by Lee; and Amphitryon , by Dryden.

The music of The Tempest is extremely beautiful, witness "Come unto these Yellow Sands" and "Full Fathom Five," which are known and admired and in vogue to this day. These pieces being allied to Shakespeare's lines are not likely to be superseded by other composers' music, but unfortunately the major part of Purcell's work in The Tempest is married to verse not Shakespeare's, and cannot therefore find any fitting place in a performance of the play.

Dioclesian , at first called The Prophetess , was advertised for publication in the London Gazette , July 3rd, 1690:—

It was published the following year with the title, " The Vocal and Instrumental Musick of the Prophetess, [Pg 52] or the History of Dioclesian , composed by Henry Purcell, Organist of their Majesties' Chappel, and of St. Peter's, Westminster. London, Printed by J. Heptinstall, for the Author, and are to be sold by John Carr, at his shop at the Middle Temple Gate near Temple-Barr. M.DCXCI."

The libretto was made into a so-called opera. Purcell dedicated the work to the Duke of Somerset, and, as was the manner of the times, introduced his published score of the music with a flowery preface; it contains many interesting passages and reads as follows:—

The music of Dioclesian is scored for "1st Violins, 2nd Violins, Tener Violins, Base Violins, 2 Flutes, 3 Hautboys (1st, 2nd, and Tener), 1 Basoon and 2 Trumpets;" the vocal parts have solos for all the voices, and there are numerous choruses. It is evident Purcell regarded this work with some affection and pride; all [Pg 54] the printed copies were corrected by his own hand. At the end of the book is printed the following:—

Although Dioclesian did not prove a lucrative investment for the composer it must have added considerably to his fame; produced at the Queen's Theatre in 1690, Downes, in his Roscius Anglicanus , says, "It gratify'd the expectation of Court and City; and got the author great reputation." One of the airs in the piece, "What shall I do to show how much I love her," was afterwards adapted to the words, "Virgins are like the Fair Flower in its Lustre," and did duty as a part of The Beggar's Opera .

The songs from Amphitryon [37] were published by Heptinstall soon after the production of the comedy.

Purcell's music for Dioclesian and for Amphitryon seems to have opened the eyes of Dryden, who had evidently been blind to the distinguished talent of the composer. In the Epistle Dedicatory to Amphitryon , dated October 24, 1690, Dryden says:—

In addition to the before-mentioned plays, Purcell composed in 1690 the music for D'Urfey's "Ode for the Queen's Birthday, April 29," commencing "Arise, my muse," and also an ode for King William beginning with the words, "Sound the trumpet."

We find that he again resigned his appointment as Copyist at Westminster Abbey, and was succeeded by Edward Braddock, who was one of the Lay Vicars and Master of the Choristers, and also a Gentleman of the Chapels Royal.

In the succeeding year, 1691, Purcell produced the music for King Arthur , written by Dryden. It was one of Purcell's most elaborate and most successful efforts in dramatic composition, and contains several pieces which have always been held in popular favour.

The solo and chorus, "Come, if you Dare," is to this day one of the most stirring and effective displays which a tenor vocalist could select, and is therefore frequently heard. The whole of the frost scene is remarkable from its vocal realism of intense and freezing cold. The peculiar and original effects here introduced by Purcell were afterwards copied by Jeremiah Clark, a fellow-student of Purcell, in the anthem, "I will love Thee, O Lord." Mention must also be made of the lovely duet, "Two daughters of this aged stream."

Unfortunately no complete copy of the score of this work, the outcome of the composer's mature judgment, exists. It is presumed that Purcell wrote only one perfect copy, which was retained by the managers of the theatre, who, jealous of possible rivals, would neither permit it to be copied in manuscript or printed. [39] The success at the time of its production is thus recorded by Downes in his Roscius Anglicanus :—

Dryden's courtly servility has been deplored by more than one author. He had followed the lead set by Charles II., who had imported Monsieur Grabu from France, and set him up as a musical king, and for him, by royal command, Dryden wrote the opera of [Pg 57] Albion and Albanius . In the preface to the work he says:—

The composer who was thus set above Purcell appears to have enjoyed a somewhat exalted opinion of his own ability, as will be seen by the following extract from the dedication of Albion and Albanius , addressed to James II. by Grabu himself:—

Contrast this bumptious self-assertion with the modest prefaces of Purcell previously quoted. However, notwithstanding the patronage of the King and the flatteries of Dryden, Albion and Albanius proved a great failure: it was performed only six times, and from the date of its last performance (1685) Dryden became impressed with the conviction that he must look elsewhere for his future composer, and, as we have already seen, he at last recognised the merits of Purcell. In the preface to King Arthur , intended by Dryden as a sequel to Albion and Albanius , the author says, "he submitted [Pg 58] himself in writing and preparing it for the stage" entirely to the guidance of Purcell. This confession was probably made with considerable compunction.

The following extracts from Dryden's Epistle Dedicatory , prefixed to the libretto, will be read with interest:—

Dryden had evidently by this time become aware [Pg 59] of Purcell's superiority to his contemporary musical brethren; the poet and musician met on intimate and friendly terms. It is recorded that Purcell, by virtue of his court appointments, had an apartment in the clock tower of St. James's Palace, and that Dryden when in debt availed himself of his friendship with Purcell, to escape arrest by taking refuge in Purcell's room, where he was perfectly safe, and could moreover enjoy the air and exercise in the Palace gardens. [40]

King Arthur after many years of neglect, possibly in consequence of the loss of the score of the music, was revived at Drury Lane theatre in 1770 with enormous success; again in 1781, in 1784, in 1803, and in 1842. The music remained unpublished until 1843, when it was edited by Edward Taylor, the Gresham music professor, and printed by the "Musical Antiquarian Society." Unfortunately the edition is imperfect, several pieces being still wanting, and of those which are printed we can be quite certain that they are not presented to us in the complete form composed by Purcell: for instance, the first overture is simply scored for strings, whereas Purcell freely uses flutes, hautboys, and trumpets in other parts of the work. Professor Taylor could find no trace of this overture excepting in the Theatre Ayres published by Mrs. Purcell in 1697, a collection which only gave string parts. Whilst speaking of Dryden and Purcell it will be well to correct a great blunder made by Hawkins in his History of Music ; he writes:—

Had Hawkins made proper inquiry he would have discovered that Alexander's Feast was not written by Dryden until two years after Purcell's death. This fact is verified by a letter addressed by Dryden to his son in September, 1697, in which he says: "I am writing a song for St. Cecilia's Feast ," and by the additional testimony of Mr. St. John, afterwards Lord Bolingbroke. [42]

In 1691 Purcell composed the music for Distressed Innocence , a tragedy by Elkanah Settle, and also for the comedies called the Gordian Knot Untyed , by an anonymous author, and Sir Anthony Love by Southerne. In addition to these works he wrote an "Ode for the Queen's Birthday," commencing "Welcome glorious morn."

In 1692, he composed music for the plays, entitled, the Wife's Excuse , by Southerne; the Indian Queen , by Howard and Dryden; the Indian Emperour , by Dryden; Œdipus , a tragedy by Dryden and Lee; the Marriage-hater match'd , by D'Urfey; and the so-called opera, the Fairy Queen , anonymously adapted from Shakespeare's Midsummer Night's Dream . The music of the Indian Queen abounds in very striking passages; it is [Pg 61] only necessary to recall the titles of "Ye Twice ten Hundred Deities," which Dr. Burney considered the best recitative in the English language; the dramatic air, "By the Croaking of the Toad," and the delightful song, "I Attempt from Love's Sickness to fly," a ditty again made popular by the exquisite singing of Hobbs in the generation just passed away. [43]

Three years after the first performance of the Indian Queen , some portion of the music was published without the consent, or even consultation, of the composer; the publication, now become very rare, has the following title:—

Comment on this legal robbery of the fruit of an author's brain-work is quite unnecessary.

The music to Œdipus is very dramatic, but not of great importance. That of the Fairy Queen , on the contrary, is of considerable pretension and was a great success. Downes, in his Roscius Anglicanus , says:—

A portion of the music was published by the composer with the title, "Some select songs as they are sung in the Fairy Queen , set to musick by Mr. Henry Purcell, London. Printed by J. Heptinstall for the [Pg 63] Author, and are to be sold by John Carr, at the Inner Temple Gate, near Temple Barr, by Henry Playford at his shop in the Temple, and at the Theatre in Dorset Gardens, 1692."

A few pieces from the opera were also published separately; one beginning "Now the maids and the men," with the curious heading "A Dialogue in the Opera call'd the Fairy Queen , set by Mr. Henry Purcell, sung by Mr. Reading [44] and (Mr. Pate in Woman's habit), and exactly engrav'd by Tho. Cross."

The Fairy Queen seems to have shared the fate of much other music of Purcell's, for the London Gazette , Oct. 13th, 1700, has the following advertisement:—"The score of the musick for the Fairy Queen set by the late Mr. Henry Purcell, and belonging to the Patentees of the Theatre Royal in Covent Garden, London, being lost by his death, whosoever brings the said score, or a copy thereof, to Mr. Zackary Baggs, Treasurer of the said Theatre, shall have 20 guineas reward." The advertisement was repeated, evidently without any successful result, as the opera was not reproduced, but long years afterwards one of the songs, [Pg 64] "If Love's a Sweet Passion," was adapted to words by Gay for the Beggar's Opera .

In this same year, 1692, Purcell composed an ode for the Queen's birthday to words of Sir Charles Sedley, commencing "Love's Goddess sure was blind." This ode is notable as containing the song, "May her blest example chase," the bass of which is the melody of the old ballad "Cold and raw," a very popular song of the day. It had been wrought into a catch by John Hilton in 1652, but the reason for its incorporation by Purcell in the Queen's birthday ode is narrated by Hawkins as follows:—

Hawkins no doubt had this story from Gostling, the son of the Gostling mentioned in the anecdote, and it is therefore probably true.

In the same year he composed one of his most celebrated odes, for the festival held in honour of St. Cecilia at the Stationers' Hall, November 22nd. The Gentleman's Journal or Monthly Miscellany , a periodical published immediately afterward, gives an account of the performance as follows:—

The author was the Rev. Nicholas Brady of the churches of St. Catherine Cree, and St. Michael, Wood Street, better known as the co-labourer with Tate in the versions of the Psalms published under their joint names.

The Gentleman's Journal , January, 1693, has an Epigram "by Mr. B—y, whose Ode for St. Cecilia's [Pg 66] Day you liked so well." The words of the ode were printed in 1782 [45] with Dr. Brady's name as author.

The air which Purcell "sang with incredible graces" we are able to identify by means of various separate publications of the song. The title of one copy printed in 1692 or 1693 reads thus, "'Tis Nature's Voice (Ode for St. Cecilia's day), a song set by Mr. H. Purcell, and sung by himself at St. Cecilia's Feast in 1692, the words by N. Brady."

The "incredible graces" are, of course, numerous division passages, commonly called runs. These graces were much in vogue in Purcell's day, and unfortunately he too often pandered to the vulgar taste of the multitude, and injured his music by writing many such, both in his sacred and secular works. The fashion was probably borrowed from the Italians. Bedford, in his Abuse of Musick , printed in 1711, says:—

The following curious anecdote told by Tony Aston, in his Brief Supplement to Colley Cibber , further illustrates the custom of gracing music which descended to our own times:—

The "Cecilia Ode" of 1692 was frequently performed, and must have been an especial favourite, if we may judge by the numerous manuscript copies of the score still in existence. The work was published by "The Musical Antiquarian Society" a few years since.

In 1693 Purcell composed music for the plays, the Old Bachelor , a comedy by Congreve; the Richmond Heiress , a comedy by D'Urfey; the Maid's Last Prayer , a comedy by Southerne; and Henry II. , a tragedy by Bancroft. In addition to these pieces he composed music for the "Queen's Birthday Ode," commencing "Celebrate this festival," the libretto of which was written by Nahum Tate. The overture to this ode is the same as that to the "Cecilia Ode" of the same year, transposed one note lower, from D to C. It has been printed in a very incorrect manner by Goodison.

One other ode belongs also to this year. It was written by Tate for the commemoration of the centenary of the foundation of Trinity College, Dublin, and commences "Great Parent, hail." It is supposed that the ode was performed at Christ Church, Dublin, on the 9th of January, 1694; but no information on the subject has as yet been discovered either at Trinity College or [Pg 68] Christ Church. The ode was included in Goodison's "Purcell publications."

In 1694 Purcell revised the twelfth edition of John Playford's Introduction to the Skill of Musick . The third part of the work, which treats of The Art of Descant , [46] appears to have been almost wholly re-written by Purcell. The directions for the use of "discords" were quite novel for the time, and so also must have been the paragraph where he says, "Formerly they used to compose from the Bass , but modern authors compose to the Treble when they make Counterpoint or Basses to tunes or songs." Again, in speaking of composition in three parts, he writes, "The first thing to treat of is Counterpoint , and in this I must differ from Mr. Simpson (whose Compendium I admire as the most ingenious book I e're met with on this subject); but his rule in three parts for Counterpoint is too strict and destructive to good air, which ought to be preferred above such nice rules." He then goes on to explain that in vocal music the parts should move smoothly, but that in instrumental music greater freedom would be admissible, and he points out the Italian composers as worthy models. He also gives a "Canon, four in one," by Dr. Blow, of whom he says, his "character is sufficiently known by his works, of which this very instance is enough to recommend him for one of the greatest masters in the world."

To Purcell's labours of this year, 1694, we are indebted for the music to the plays of Don Quixote , Parts I. and II. Purcell only composed a portion of the music required, but amongst the number are two worthy of particular mention,—a duet, "Sing all ye Muses," and a bass song, "Let the dreadful engines." The libretto was the work of D'Urfey.

Purcell also wrote music for a comedy called the Married Beau , by Crowne; for the Double Dealer , a comedy by Congreve; for the Fatal Marriage , a tragedy by Southerne; and also for Love Triumphant , a tragi-comedy by Dryden [47] .

To these must be added another "Ode for the Queen's Birthday," beginning, "Come ye sons of art;" and last and best of all, the great "Te Deum and Jubilate" in D, composed with orchestral accompaniments, the first example of such a work this country had seen.

Composed expressly for the festival of St. Cecilia's Day, 1694, the music was published by Purcell's widow in 1697, with the following dedication:—

The intention of annually performing the "Te Deum and Jubilate" must have been formed in 1697, the year of publication, as we know that in 1696 Dr. Blow composed a "Te Deum and Jubilate" which were performed. Purcell's work was immediately adopted by the "Corporation of the Sons of the Clergy" [48] for performance at their Annual Festival, and its use continued until Handel, in 1713, composed his "Te Deum and Jubilate" for the Peace of Utrecht. After that time the works of Purcell and Handel were performed alternately until 1743, when Handel's new work composed for the victory at Dettingen displaced the two former compositions. Of course Handel must have often heard Purcell's "Te Deum;" and [Pg 71] that he greatly profited by it is evident from the striking resemblance of many passages in his own Te Deum , when compared with that of his illustrious predecessor.

But it must in candour be admitted that the remarkable likeness between Purcell's "Te Deum," as it is now performed, and Handel's "Dettingen Te Deum," is greatly due to Dr. Boyce, who, being a thorough Handelian scholar, re-scored and re-arranged Purcell's work.

Queen Mary died on the 28th of December, 1694, and Purcell composed the music for her funeral, which took place the 5th of March following (1695), in Westminster Abbey. Purcell composed two anthems, to the words, "Blessed is the man that feareth the Lord," and "Thou knowest, Lord, the secrets of our hearts." Contemporary records speak in affecting terms of the solemnity of the occasion;—"the day was dark and troubled, and a few ghastly plumes of snow fell on the black plumes of the funeral car." The procession was attended by the two Houses of Parliament with their maces, "the Lords robed in scarlet and ermine, and the Commons in long black mantles;" the banners of England and France, Scotland and Ireland, were borne before the corpse. On the gorgeous coffin of purple and gold were laid the crown and sceptre of the realm. Inside the Abbey, the whole of the church, nave, choir, and transepts were all ablaze with innumerable waxlights; and a little robin-redbreast, who had found refuge from the inclement weather, constantly flew down and perched on the hearse, seeming to the [Pg 72] spectators as if he, too, mourned for the Queen who had been so loved and was now so lamented. Of Purcell's music, Dr. Tudway, one of the choir on this occasion, says: "The anthem, 'Blessed is the man,' was composed after the old way, and was sung at the interment of Queen Mary in Westminster Abbey; a great Queen and extremely lamented, being there to be interred, everybody present was disposed and serious at so solemn a service, as indeed they ought to be at all parts of Divine worship. I appeal to all that were present, as well such as understood music, as those that did not, whether they ever heard anything so rapturously fine, and solemn, and so heavenly in the operation, which drew tears from all; and yet a plain natural composition, which shows the power of music, when 'tis rightly fitted and adapted to devotional purposes." The second anthem, "Thou knowest, Lord, the secrets of our hearts," Dr. Tudway says, "was accompanied by flat, mournful trumpets." This majestic movement is a splendid monument to the memory of Purcell. It has been used at every choral funeral in Westminster Abbey and St. Paul's Cathedral since its first production. Dr. Croft, who subsequently set the "Burial Office" to music, refrained from composing to these words, on the ground that the music of Purcell was unapproachable, and adds, that in composing his own music he had endeavoured, as near as possible, to "imitate that great master and celebrated composer, whose name will for ever stand high in the rank of those who have laboured to improve the English style, in his so happily adapting his compositions to English words [Pg 73] in that elegant and judicious manner, as was unknown to many of his predecessors."

Queen Mary died of small-pox, and the memory of her goodness was felt so universally by the people that writers vied with each other in their endeavours to perpetuate records of her worth. I have now before me a volume containing thirty-six odes and monodies to her memory, all published in 1695. Amongst them are an "Epicedium," set to music by Dr. Blow, the words by Mr. Herbert; a Latin version of the same, commencing, "Incassum Lesbia," set to music by Henry Purcell, for a solo voice; and another beginning, "O dive custos auriacæ domus," also set to music by Purcell, for two voices.

Purcell was in a delicate state of health at the time of writing the music for Queen Mary's funeral, yet he seems to have worked with undiminished determination, composing music for the comedy, the Canterbury Guest , written by Ravenscroft; the Mock Marriage , a comedy by Scott; the Rival Sisters , a tragedy by Gould; Oroonoko , a tragedy by Southerne; the Knight of Malta , a play by Beaumont and Fletcher; and Bonduca, or the British Heroine , a tragedy adapted from Beaumont and Fletcher,—this play included the catch, "Jack, Thou'rt a Toper," the admirable duets, "To Arms," and "Britons Strike Home." Some of the music was printed on single sheets immediately after performance, but it remained for the "Musical Antiquarian Society" to issue in 1842 a complete copy of the score, edited by Dr. Rimbault.

Purcell also, on 24th July in this year, produced [Pg 74] a "Birthday Ode" for the Duke of Gloucester. The ode commences, "Who can from joy refrain." It was written for solo voices and chorus with orchestral accompaniments. Among the principal singers at the first performance were Mr. Howell, Mr. Robert, and Mr. Damascene.

Purcell also wrote some music for D'Urfey's third part of Don Quixote . Amongst the pieces he contributed to this play was the celebrated cantata, "From Rosie Bowers." This song was frequently reprinted, and with the note that it was "The last song the Author sett, it being in his sickness." It is probable that D'Urfey had hoped to have had the advantage of Purcell's musical skill for the setting of all his verses in the third part of Don Quixote , but it would seem that Purcell was too ill to accomplish the work.

"From Rosie Bowers" was considered so important by D'Urfey that he published the music of the third part of Don Quixote with the following title:—

In the year of the publication just named another song was printed, commencing, "Lovely Albina," with the heading, "The last Song that Mr. Henry Purcell sett before he dy'd." But a later edition says, "The last song the author sett before his sickness." There cannot be much doubt, therefore, that the air "From Rosie Bowers" was really Purcell's last work. D'Urfey's print and tradition agree in this.

And now we come to the last scene of all. It is the 21st of November, 1695,—by a curious coincidence the eve of the festival of St. Cecilia, a day so frequently celebrated by Purcell. In a house on the West side of Dean's Yard, Westminster, in a darkened chamber, the dying musician is lying on his couch in full possession of all his faculties, as he himself had just said in his will, but with a thorough knowledge that he was about to pass into the land of shadows. He could possibly hear some faint murmurs of the evensong service wafted from the old Abbey close by, perhaps some well-remembered phrase of one of his own soul-stirring anthems. The psalm of the day which would be chanted at that evening service concluded with words which he had set to music the world was not likely soon to forget—music which still remains unsurpassed in truthfulness and dignity. A more noble or a more fitting death-chant for a child of song it would be difficult to find:—

By his bed-side were gathered his aged mother, his [Pg 76] young wife, and his three infant children; and so amid their sighs and tears his gentle spirit passed into the better world, there to continue his service of song and praise in fulness and perfection.

That Purcell was sincerely loved and mourned by relations and friends we know, and the following testimony of tender regard will be read with interest. It is written on the fly-leaf of a copy of his opera Dioclesian :— [50]

Jacob Talbot was a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, and the author of the words of an "Ode for the Consert at York Buildings, upon the death of Mr. Purcell," which will be found in the Orpheus Britannicus , 1698.

Purcell was buried on the 26th of November in Westminster Abbey, beneath the organ which had so often responded to his skilful touch. The anthems he had composed for Queen Mary's funeral only a few months before were again performed, so that Purcell [Pg 77] had rehearsed and inaugurated his own dirge. Doubtless the remembrance of this would bring home to the mourners the intense pathos of the music with double force.

Even in 1722 the inscription had become almost illegible from the wear of passing feet, and soon was entirely obliterated. The grave-stone remained in this condition until 1876, when, by the exertions of Mr. Henry F. Turle, son of the respected organist of the Abbey, a private subscription was made which provided funds for placing another stone and restoring the inscription. By permission of the Dean, the following lines were added:—

This memorial was erected by the Lady Elizabeth Howard, whom Hawkins, and others, have supposed to have been the wife of Dryden, and a pupil of Purcell. Hawkins also inferred that it was Dryden who wrote the inscription for the memorial, and further, that the dedication of the Orpheus Britannicus to Lady Elizabeth Howard was intended for Dryden's wife.

All these surmises are wrong. Dryden married Lady Elizabeth Howard, the eldest daughter of the Earl of Berkshire, in 1665, when Purcell was seven years old. Of course, after the marriage the wife ceased to be Lady Elizabeth Howard : moreover, her husband's (Dryden) means would scarcely have permitted the serious cost of Purcell's memorial tablet. This was in reality erected by the wife of Sir Robert Howard, the dramatist, who had been associated with Purcell in theatrical composition, and the lady had been a pupil of Purcell; the probability is, therefore, that Sir Robert wrote the inscription.

Purcell made his will on the day of his death; it is important, and reads as follows:—

Purcell's widow was thus left sole executrix, and she with her children—Frances, aged 7, Edward, aged 6, and Mary Peters, aged 2 years—continued to reside for a time at the house in Great Dean's Yard, from whence, in 1696, Mrs. Purcell issued A Choice Collection of Lessons for the Harpsichord or Spinnet, composed by the late Mr. Henry Purcell, Organist of his Majesties Chappel Royal, and of St. Peter's, Westminster . Of this popular little work three editions were speedily exhausted. In 1697 Mrs. Purcell published a collection of Ten Sonatas in four parts, composed by the late Mr. Henry Purcell , and also A Collection of Ayres, compos'd for the Theatre, and upon other occasions, by the late Mr. Henry Purcell ; and in 1698 a further publication of the first volume of Orpheus Britannicus: A Collection of all the Choicest Songs for one, two, and three voices, compos'd by Mr. Henry Purcell; together with such Symphonies for Violins or Flutes as were by him design'd for any of them: and a thorough-bass to each song; figur'd for [Pg 80] the Organ, Harpsichord, or Theorbolute. All which are placed in their several Keys according to the order of the Gamut.

To each of the above-mentioned works Mrs. Purcell prefixed dedicatory epistles, and in all of them she speaks in most affectionate terms of her deceased husband; nevertheless, the breath of slander in later years attributed to her some measure of responsibility for her husband's untimely death. Mrs. Purcell eventually removed from the house in Westminster to Richmond, in Surrey, where she died in February, 1706, and was buried on the 14th of that month with her deceased husband in Westminster Abbey, having survived him eleven years. On the 7th of February, 1706, she made a nuncupative will as she sat in the parlour of her dwelling house, by which she appointed Mr. Thomas Tovey her executor until her daughter, Frances Purcell, should reach the age of eighteen, when she was to be her executrix. Mrs. Purcell goes on to say that, "According to her husband's desire, she had given her deare son (Edward) a good education, and she alsoe did give him all the Bookes of Musicke in generall, the Organ, the double spinett, the single spinett, a silver tankard, a silver watch, two pair of gold buttons, a hair ring, a mourning ring of Dr. Busby's, a Larum clock, Mr. Edward Purcell's picture, handsome furniture for a room, and he was to be maintained until provided for. All the residue of her property she gave to her said daughter Frances." [51]

Sir John Hawkins, in his History of Music , would seem to suggest that Purcell left his family in distressed circumstances, but the will of the widow, of which he evidently knew nothing, gives a satisfactory refutation of such a surmise. Hawkins also charges Purcell with associating with tavern company; his words are:—

We see from this, that Hawkins had some doubt as to the truth of the story, and his daughter writing in 1822, [52] respecting some aspersions which had been cast on her mother in reference to her treatment of her father, says, "Sir John Hawkins was not at home at all the sooner for his wife's fetching him. Mrs. Purcell, I should conjecture, had other modes of attracting Mr. Purcell; yet perhaps the whole may have been as gross a falsification as that by which Lady Hawkins is vilified."

In a volume of poetry of glees published by Richard Clark in 1824, he improves the tale told by Hawkins, and boldly adds details. He prints the words of the catch, "Jack, thou'rt a toper."

To these lines he appends the name of Tom Brown, and tells us that Jack was intended for Dr. Blow, and that "Purcell appears to have spent much of his time with Tom Brown, who wrote the words of most [Pg 83] of his catches." Purcell never set a single line of Brown's, and they were wholly unacquainted with each other, as may be learnt from the following verses written by Brown in June, 1693, two years before Purcell's death, "To his unknown friend, Mr. H. Purcell , upon his excellent compositions in the Harmonia Sacra ."

The above lines were printed in the Gentleman's [Pg 84] Journal with an editorial note: "A music book intituled Harmonia Sacra will shortly be printed for Mr. Playford. I need not say anything more to recommend it to you, than that you will find in it many of Mr. Henry Purcell's admirable composures. As they charm all men, they are universally extolled, and even those who know him no otherwise than by his Notes are fond of expressing their sense of his merit. Mr. Thomas Brown is one of those, as you will find by these lines."

The lines appeared in the several editions of Harmonia Sacra even as late as 1714, and there is no ground for believing that the poet and musician ever met.

Dr. Arne gave a concert at Drury Lane Theatre on the 21st of June, 1768, for which he published a book of the words; and one of the pieces is Purcell's catch, "Jack, thou'rt a toper." To this Arne has appended the following note:—

When we consider the immense amount and varied kind of labour Purcell accomplished during his short life of thirty-seven years, we must conclude that although of a bright and joyous nature he was of temperate habits; he had not only his duties at Westminster Abbey [Pg 85] and the Chapel Royal to fulfil, but there was also constant occupation in composing for the Church, the Court, and the Theatre; he had numerous professional pupils, and gave lessons in the families of some of the most distinguished gentry and aristocracy; he also was frequently called upon to preside over and direct the concerts which were given in private assemblies. The Lord Keeper North, well known for his theoretical and practical skill in music, and the author of the Memoires of Musick , was wont to employ him in that capacity at his house in Queen Street.

The position Purcell held in his profession necessitated his keeping late hours, which undoubtedly overtaxed a delicate constitution and culminated in his fatal illness in the prime of his manhood. Valuable testimony to this view of the circumstances attending Purcell's death is to be found in a curious volume called the Great Abuse of Musick , published in 1711 by the Rev. Arthur Bedford, Chaplain to the Duke of Bedford, and Vicar of the Temple in Bristol. The author, himself a musician and composer, was also the writer of a companion volume, On the Evil and Danger of Stage Plays , and in both books he vigorously exposes the vice and immorality prevalent in his day, and is justly severe on poets and musicians; therefore the passages in which he speaks of his contemporaries, Blow and Purcell, are of great importance. He says:—

This testimony respecting Purcell, from a contemporary, a distinguished divine and musician, ought surely to wipe out the preposterous stories of Purcell's cold-catching and low associations.

Valuable testimony to Purcell's high aims and laborious life is to be found in the MSS. written by Dr. Tudway for Edward, Lord Harley, and now deposited in the British Museum. Dr. Tudway was just two years older than Purcell, so that he entered the choir of the Chapel Royal first; he afterwards became a tenor singer in St. George's Chapel, Windsor, and in 1670 organist of King's College, Cambridge, where he afterwards took successively the degrees of Bachelor and Doctor in Music, and eventually became Professor of the University. He was also appointed "composer extraordinary" to Queen Anne. Writing of Purcell, his fellow-student, he says:—

Evidence respecting Purcell's personal virtues and gifts is to be found in an ode printed at the commencement of the second volume of Orpheus Britannicus , 1702. The poem is too long to quote entire, but the following extracts will suffice:—

Purcell's friend and fellow-student, Henry Hall, organist of Hereford Cathedral, also printed an ode "To the Memory of my Dear Friend Mr. Henry Purcell," which concludes thus:—

It is clear that Purcell attained the highest pinnacle in the estimation of his countrymen; [53] but his fame was not confined to England. I have seen a MS. volume of music written by a contemporary musician, a native of France, and in it he designates Purcell as M. Pourselle. Roger of Amsterdam engraved and printed a set of his Sonatas; and the following anecdote is told in some of the biographies of Corelli:—

"While Corelli flourished with such éclat at Rome, Harry Purcell was famous in England, and Corelli was so greatly affected with the character and abilities of this famous English musician, that, as fame reports, he declared him to be then the only thing worth seeing in England. Accordingly the great opinion he held of Purcell made him resolve to make a journey into this kingdom on purpose to visit him," but the journey was abandoned on hearing of Purcell's death.

Another version of the story makes Corelli start on his journey, but hearing of Purcell's death on shipboard, when nearing Dover, he returns immediately to Rome.

Purcell's secular music undoubtedly frequently suffered from the worthless trash he had to accept as poetry; too often it was not only devoid of literary merit, but still worse, indecent; that was, however, the fault of the age, and pervaded most of the dramatic literature then in vogue. Even the well-known and estimable Dean of Christ Church, Oxford, Dr. Aldrich, condescended to set music to such words as shame would not permit us to print at this day.

Tom D'Urfey was a notorious offender against good taste, and for him Purcell composed very largely.

D'Urfey's verses were so uncouth and irregular in their construction, that a writer of the last century said, "The modern Pindaric Odes which are humorously resembled to a comb with the teeth broken by frequent use are nothing to them." D'Urfey wrote some especially rugged lines which he challenged Purcell to set to music; the challenge was accepted and the composer triumphed, but he confessed that it cost him more trouble than the composition of a Te Deum . The ballad in question was called "The Parson among the Peas," and was printed with Purcell's music in D'Urfey's Pills to Purge Melancholy , 1719.

At the present day music has become such an exten [Pg 91] sively developed science, particularly as regards orchestration, that it is difficult to apprehend the state of things which existed in Purcell's time; but to estimate his genius fairly we must recall the condition of the musical artistic world in which he lived. In so far as orchestration is concerned he had no models, nor had he any instrumental performers to suggest or incite his creative powers. Purcell was familiar with the family of stringed instruments called viols, and although Charles II. introduced violins from France, yet the instrument was not regarded with favour by musicians or by the people generally. Doubtless this arose from the fact that there were no remarkable players. Anthony Wood of Oxford, speaking of the year 1657, says:—

The first musician to introduce violin playing proper was Thomas Baltzar, who played at Oxford in 1658, and A. W. "saw him run up his fingers to the end of the finger-board of the violin, and run them back insensibly, and all with great alacrity and very good tune , which he nor any one in England saw the like before."

He also was the first to exhibit in England the practice of shifting, or the whole shift on the violin, [Pg 92] and the half shift was not introduced until about 1714. Baltzar died in 1663, so that it is not probable Purcell ever heard him play; indeed it has been justly remarked that the probability is he never heard a great violinist. Corelli's works were not introduced into England until after Purcell's death, and the only violin music Purcell knew was that composed by Bassani.

In 1773 Daines Barrington, a well-known writer, speaks of the "Amazing improvements in execution which both singers and players have arrived at within the last fifty years. When Corelli's music was first published, our ablest violinists conceived that it was too difficult to be performed. It is now, however, the first composition attempted by a scholar. Every year now produces greater and greater prodigies on other instruments in point of execution."

Wind instruments were equally wanting if we except the trumpet, hautboy and bassoon, and only the former could be said to have arrived at any excellence in performance: there were no flutes, [55] clarinets, horns, or trombones. It cannot therefore be expected that grand orchestral effects will be found in Purcell's music, but what we do discover is an amazing comprehension of the precise sentiment and feeling required by the words or by the situation; harmonies which surprise us by their beauty and boldness (many of them must have been absolutely new when they were created by Purcell), exquisite and refined melody, true rhythm, [Pg 93] and just accent. And when we look at Purcell's purely instrumental music, his sonatas, we find that as music they are superior to Corelli—containing more learning, more ingenuity, and yet without any appearance of labour or restraint; but Corelli was a violinist, and in that respect he had the advantage of Purcell, and knew what passages were best adapted for the instruments for which he wrote.

Of Purcell's contrapuntal skill it would be impossible to speak too highly; he has left for our wonder and admiration numerous canons constructed in all the many and artful modes that species of composition is capable of; the ingenuity and contrivance exhibited give ample evidence of his diligence and laborious study, and the highest praise of all is that in spite of the deep learning of which they give evidence they move as melodiously, and as freely, as if they were unfettered by the stern and inflexible chains imposed by the rules of the schools.

Purcell's weakness in accepting the prevailing taste for endless "graces" and divisions has already been adverted to. Another peculiarity which characterises his music may possibly be accounted for by the statement by Stafford Smith that "Mr. Purcell has been heard to declare more than once, that the variety which the minor key is capable of affording by the change of sounds in the ascending and descending scales, induced him so frequently to give it the preference." [56] Now-a-days few composers would select the minor mode when [Pg 94] composing music to the joyful words of the "Gloria Patri," or to the lines,—

Very little has been said in the progress of this biography of Purcell's anthems; they are easily obtainable in the fine edition published with so much enthusiasm by Vincent Novello, and in themselves form a most valuable material for study. It is to be hoped that before many years have passed away equal facilities will exist for gaining an intimate knowledge of his chamber and dramatic music.

Purcell's seeming repugnance to the publication of his own music is remarkable. After his death his widow issued the following advertisement:—

This list as already shown is not quite complete. [Pg 95] Henry Purcell published an Ode for Cecilia's Day , in 1684, and the Songs in the Fairy Queen , in 1692. What a meagre selection from the catalogue of his known works, which numbered nearly 150 sacred compositions, and nearly 50 dramatic compilations, 28 odes, and a large number of other vocal and instrumental pieces which cannot be classed under either of the foregoing heads.

PURCELL'S FAMILY.

In the foregoing pages I have spoken of Purcell's father and uncle, but made no mention of his ancestry. Nothing absolutely certain is known of them. Various surmises have been made from time to time, and as the name of Purcel had been common in Ireland for some centuries, [57] people have endeavoured to trace the composer's family in that country, but no reason or evidence has as yet been found for supposing that Purcell inherited Celtic blood.

The national archives preserved at Somerset House furnish material for speculation in this matter; the following wills may very probably have been made by some of the great composer's ancestors:—

The parish registers of St. Margaret's, Westminster, contain occasional mention of the name of Pursell or Purcell, the earliest being 1575; but whether the records before 1658 refer to members of the composer's family it has not been possible to determine.

Purcell's mother died in August, 1699, having survived her son nearly four years; her burial is recorded in the books of St. Margaret's, Westminster, thus:—"Mrs. Eliz ^th Pursell, Ch. [59] August 26, 1699;" her estate was "administered to" on the 7th of the following September by her daughter Katherine, who had been baptized in Westminster Abbey on the 13th of March, 1662. This younger sister of Purcell was married on the 20th June, 1691, to the Rev. William Sale, of Sheldwich, Kent.

Purcell had two brothers, Edward and Daniel: the former was born in 1653. The story of his life is briefly told in the inscription placed on his gravestone in the chancel of Wytham Church, near Oxford:

Daniel Purcell was a younger brother of the great composer; the exact date of his birth is not known, but it is believed to have been about 1660. Of his early musical training nothing has been ascertained, he was too young when his father died to have received any instructions from him; possibly in his boyhood he may not have shown remarkable traits of musical ability; and in his more mature years his undoubted talent was altogether over-shadowed by the superior genius of his brother, to whom he was indebted for some part of the practical and theoretical knowledge of music he possessed. The first official appointment with which we can identify him is that of organist of Magdalen College, Oxford, to which he succeeded in 1686, soon after the ejectment from that post of Dr. Benjamin Rogers, who with the other fellows of the College was unjustly expelled by [Pg 99] James II. In 1693 Daniel Purcell composed music for a "Saint Cecilia's Day Ode" written by Thomas Yalden, which is believed to have been performed at Oxford. He resigned his appointment at Magdalen College in 1695, in order that he might reside in London, and in the following year, 1696, composed music for the tragedy "Ibrahim XII.," written by Mary Pix; also for an opera called "Brutus of Alba, or Augusta's Triumph." This was written by George Powell, the comedian, and John Verbruggen; it was performed at the theatre in Dorset Gardens in the following year. The songs were immediately published with a dedication "to P. Norton and A. Henley, Esquires." In 1697, in conjunction with Jeremiah Clarke, he composed music for Settle's opera, "The New World in the Moon," and also for D'Urfey's opera, "Cynthia and Endymion." In 1698 he composed songs for a tragedy, "Phaeton, or the Fatal Divorce," written by Gildon, also an ode for the Princess Anne's birthday, [60] and an ode for Saint Cecilia's Day, written by Bishop. [61] In 1699, he was associated with Jeremiah Clarke and Leveridge in composing music for "The Island Princess," an opera by Motteux, and he also composed music for a "Saint Cecilia Ode" written by Addison for performance at Oxford. In 1700 he composed the work which has generally been considered his greatest success, an opera entitled "The [Pg 100] Grove, or Love's Paradise," written by J. Oldmixon, and performed at Drury Lane. Daniel Purcell is said to have designed and penned this music whilst staying with his patron, Anthony Henley, of the Grange, in Hampshire, or at the residence of Philip Norton, of Southwick, in the same county, another of his patrons, who was in the habit of entertaining his friends in the summer time with dramatic representations.

On the 21st of March, 1699, [62] the following advertisement appeared in the London Gazette :—

The Earl of Halifax was the originator and one of the principal contributors to the prize fund; he was also one of the adjudicators. The poem selected for the composers to exercise their skill and fancy on was "The Judgment of Paris," written by Congreve. The first prize was won by John Weldon, [63] the second by John Eccles, the third by Daniel Purcell , and the fourth by Godfrey Finger.

The prize compositions of Daniel Purcell and Eccles were speedily published, but Weldon's work remains in [Pg 101] MS., as does also that by Finger, who was so annoyed at the small success his composition achieved that he left England in disgust.

In 1701 Daniel Purcell composed music for "The Unhappy Penitent," a tragedy by Catherine Trotter; in 1702 for "The Inconstant," a comedy by Farquhar. In the Diverting Post , October 28th, 1704, we read—

This composition was very highly commended in the Muses Mercury , 1707, which speaks also in warm terms of a masque set by Daniel Purcell called "Orpheus and Euridice." In 1707 he composed a "Saint Cecilia Ode," which was performed at Oxford in St. Mary's Hall.

Amongst his compositions, printed and manuscript; not already mentioned, are Anthems, Songs for the plays [Pg 102] "The Careless Husband," "The Humor of the Age," and "Magbeth." [64] "Sonatas or Solos for the violin with a thorough bass for the harpsichord, or bass-violin." "Sonatas for flute and bass," and "A Lamentation for the Death of Mr. Henry Purcell."

The words of this "Lamentation" were written by Nahum Tate, and conclude with the following lines:—

Daniel Purcell was appointed organist of St. Andrew, Holborn, in 1713, and retained the position until his death in 1717. Sir John Hawkins in his History, [65] says:—

That Hawkins has made a series of mistakes in the above statement, is clear from the following advertisement, which appeared in the Daily Courant , December 12, 1717:—

This shows that Daniel vacated his organistship by death. Unfortunately the parish book which might tell us the result of the election by the householders cannot [Pg 104] be found; but it evidently was not permitted to be a final decision, for on the 17th of the ensuing February, 1718, a Vestry was held, of which the following is a minute:— [66]

The strokes show that Greene was elected by six votes, seemingly the whole vestry, as no votes are marked against the names of the other candidates. Greene, however, soon resigned the appointment, and a new election took place.

Here again Edward Purcell was unsuccessful, Mr. John Isham obtaining eleven votes.

After the death of Daniel Purcell the following advertisement appeared in the Post Boy , Saturday, 26th April, 1718:—

This work was probably the curious collection still extant bearing the following title: "The Psalms Set full for the Organ or Harpsichord as they are Plaid in Churches and Chappels in the maner given out; as also with their interludes of great Variety, by Mr. Dan ^l Purcell, late Organist of St. Andrew's, Holbourn."

Daniel Purcell is credited by Hawkins as having been more skilful and successful as a punster than as a composer. Of his puns we have now no evidence upon which to form a judgment, but his music exists to show that the historian's verdict is not always to be relied on.

Of the children of Henry Purcell mention has [Pg 106] already been made: he had six in all, three of them, John Baptista, Thomas, and Henry, died in infancy, during the lifetime of their father; and it is probable that a fourth child, Mary Peters, survived him but a few months. The daughter Frances, who was born in 1688, outlived both her parents; her mother immediately before her death, in February, 1706, nominated Frances as her executrix and residuary legatee: accordingly she proved the will on the 4th July following. She married Leonard Welsted, a poet and dramatist, son of the Rev. Leonard Welsted, Rector of Abington, Northamptonshire. Welsted had been a King's scholar at Westminster School, from whence he was elected to Trinity College, Cambridge. "When very young he married the daughter of Henry Purcell, the celebrated musician, and obtained an appointment in the Secretary of State's office." [67]

The young couple were of the same age, and must have married when nineteen, as the register of St. Margaret's, Westminster, records the baptism of their daughter Frances on the 2nd of September, 1708. [68] Mrs. Welsted died in 1724, not having attained the age of her celebrated father, and the daughter died in 1726, aged eighteen.

Purcell's youngest son, Edward, born in 1689, was the only one who survived him, and like his father, was but six years old when he became an orphan. His mother had promised her dying husband carefully to attend to the child's education, a promise she conscien [Pg 107] tiously and affectionately kept for ten years, until 1706, when she died, leaving the lad of sixteen to the guidance of his sister Frances, who was but two years older. The children, however, possessed many influential friends, and in the following year, 1707, Frances married. We know nothing more of Edward's doings for a few succeeding years, but it is probable that he married in 1710, as the register-book of St. Margaret's, Westminster, contains the entry of a baptism on "May 4th, 1711, of Frances, daughter of Edward and Anne Purcell, born on 19th April." The register-book of St. Martin-in-the-Fields for 1716 contains a baptismal entry which seems to refer to a son of Edward Purcell: "Dec. 11, Henry, son of Edward and Anne Purcell, born 26 Nov." In 1717 Edward was a candidate for the organist's place of St. Andrew's, Holborn, as I have shown when speaking of Daniel Purcell; but Edward was, as we have seen, unsuccessful, not only on that occasion, but also in 1718 when he again applied for the appointment. In 1726, on the 8th of July, he was made organist of St. Margaret's, Westminster, and it is said that he succeeded his father as organist of St. Clement's, Eastcheap. In 1738 he was enrolled amongst the first list of members and founders of the "Society of Musicians," now known as the "Royal Society of Musicians," and it is supposed that he died in 1740, as in that year he ceased to be organist of St. Margaret's, Westminster. His successor was appointed on the 6th of August, 1740.

He had a son, the date of whose birth I have not been able to trace, who was named Edward Henry . [Pg 108] Hawkins blunders here again: he says Edward Purcell "was succeeded by his son Henry, who had been bred up in the King's Chapel under Mr. Gates. This Henry became also organist of St. Edmund the King, London, and after that of St. John, Hackney. He died about twenty-five years ago. [69] His father was a good organist, but himself a very indifferent one."

Chamberlaine's Magnæ Britannia Notitia , 1737, on page 219, gives the "children's names" of the Chapel Royal, [70] and there we find Edward Henry Purcell . The correctness of the name is confirmed by an entry in a magnificent book of music now in the Queen's library in Buckingham Palace. The volume is wholly in Henry Purcell's autograph. It had belonged to Edward Purcell, and contains an entry in his hand: "Score booke—Anthems and Welcome Songs, and other songs, all by my father." At the other end of the book is an autograph inscription, "E ^d H. Purcell, Grandson to the Author of this book."

The parish books show that he was re-elected annually down to Easter Tuesday, April 24, 1764, when there is an entry—

There is also an entry made by the Vestry Clerk, April, 1764: "N.B.—Wrote to him and he said he would name his deputy."

On Easter Tuesday, April 8th, 1765, the Vestry minutes record the appointment of organ-blower, but no mention is made of the organist; we may therefore infer that Purcell was not continued in the post, as in the following year, 1766, we read—

CHRONOLOGICAL MEMORANDA.

1658.	Henry Purcell, the composer, born.
1659.	Meeting of Purcell's father, Matthew Locke, and Pepys.
1661.	Charles the Second crowned. Henry Purcell, the father, and Thomas Purcell, the uncle of the composer, attend the coronation as gentlemen of the Chapel Royal.
1663.	Purcell's father appointed a member of the Royal Band.
1664.	The father died. Purcell entered the Chapel Royal under Captain Cooke.
1667.	Purcell's three-part song, "Sweet Tyraness," published.
1669.	Purcell composed "An Address to the King."
1672.	Purcell's master, Captain Cooke, died; succeeded by Pelham Humphreys.
1674.	Humphreys died; succeeded by Dr. John Blow.
1676.	Purcell appointed copyist of Westminster Abbey. Composed music for (1) "Epsom Wells;" (2) "Aurenge-Zebe; (3) "The Libertine."
1677.	Purcell composed an Elegy on the death of Matthew Locke; also the music for "Abdelazor."
1678.	Resigned the appointment of copyist at Westminster Abbey. "Sweet Tyraness," newly arranged, republished. Music for "Timon of Athens" composed.
1679.	Composed music for Rev. John Gostling's voice.
1680.	Appointed organist of Westminster Abbey. Composed music for (1) "The Virtuous Wife;" (2) "Theodosius;" and the Opera "Dido and Æneas." Also two Odes, "A welcome song for his Royal Highness's return from Scotland," and "A song to welcome his Majesty home from Windsor."
1681.	Composed an Ode for the King, "Swifter, Isis, swifter flow."
1682.	Purcell appointed organist of the Chapel Royal. Composed an Ode for the King "On his return from Newmarket;" also music for "The Lord Mayor's Show." His uncle Thomas died; a son, John Baptista, born and died.
1683.	Sonatas of three parts published. Appointed "composer in ordinary" to the King. Composed three "Odes for the festival of St. Cecilia;" also "A welcome song [Pg 114] for the King;" "Fly, bold rebellion;" and Ode, "From hardy climes," for Prince George of Denmark, on his marriage with the Princess Anne.
1684.	Published a "St. Cecilia" Ode. Composed an Ode to welcome the King, "On his return to Whitehall after his summer's progress." Performed on the new organ erected by Father Smith in the Temple Church.
1685.	James II. crowned in Westminster Abbey. For the ceremony Purcell composed two Anthems, "I was glad," and "My heart is inditing." Composed an Ode, "Why are all the muses mute," in honour of the King. Also the music for "Circe."
1686.	Composed "Lilliburlero," also the music for "Tyrannic Love." His brother and pupil, Daniel, appointed organist of Magdalen College, Oxford. His infant son, Thomas, died. An Ode for the King, "Ye tuneful muses," composed.
1687.	Composed an Elegy on the death of John Playford, the younger. An Ode for the King, "Sound the trumpet, beat the drum." Purcell's son, Henry, born and died.
1688.	Purcell composed, by command, a thanksgiving Anthem for the Queen's pregnancy, "Blessed are they that fear the Lord." Composed also the music for "A fool's preferment," an Ode "For the King," and the Anthem, "The Lord is King." A daughter, Frances, born.
1689.	William and Mary crowned in Westminster Abbey. Purcell threatened, by Dean and Chapter of Westminster, with suspension. Composed "Celestial music" an Ode "At the Prince of Denmark's coming home," also "The Yorkshire feast song." A son, Edward, born.
1690.	Purcell composed an Ode, "Arise my muse," for the Queen's birthday, and another, "Sound the trumpet," for King William. Also music for (1) "The Tempest;" (2) "Dioclesian;" (3) "Massacre of Paris;" (4) "Amphitryon."
1691.	He composed music for (1) "Distressed innocence;" (2) "King Arthur;" (3) "The Gordian knot untyed;" (4) "Sir Anthony Love;" also an Ode, "Welcome, glorious morn," for the Queen's birthday.
1692.	He composed the music for (1) "The Fairy Queen" (and published "Some select songs" from that opera); (2) "The Wife's excuse;" (3) "The Indian Queen;" (4) "The Indian Emperour;" (5) "Œdipus;" (6) "Cleomenes;" (7) "The marriage-hater match'd;" also an Ode, "Love's goddess sure was blind," for the Queen's [Pg 115] birthday, and an Ode, "Hail, great Cecilia," for the anniversary of St. Cecilia.
1693.	He composed a Commemoration Ode, "Great Parent, hail," for Trinity College, Dublin, and music for (1) "The old bachelor;" (2) "The Richmond heiress;" (3) "The maid's last prayer;" (4) "Henry the Second." Also an Ode, "Celebrate this festival," for the Queen's birthday.
1694.	He composed music for the first and second parts of (1) "Don Quixote;" (2) "The married beau;" (3) "The double dealer;" (4) "The fatal marriage;" (5) "Love triumphant;" also the Te Deum and Jubilate in D for the festival of St. Cecilia, and an Ode, "Come, ye sons of art," for the Queen's birthday. "The art of descant," for John Playford.
1695.	He composed Anthems for the funeral of Queen Mary, "Blessed is the man," and "Thou knowest, Lord." Two Latin Elegies on the Queen. A birthday Ode, "Who can from joy refrain?" for the Duke of Gloucester. Music for (1) "The Canterbury Guests;" (2) "The Mock Marriage;" (3) "The Rival Sisters;" (4) "Oroonoko;" (5) "The Knight of Malta;" (6) "Bonduca;" (7) "The third part of Don Quixote." Purcell died Nov. 21st; buried in Westminster Abbey, Nov. 26th.
1699.	Purcell's mother died.
1706.	Purcell's widow died.
1707.	Purcell's daughter married to L. Welsted.
1710.	Purcell's son, Edward, married.
1717.	Edward Purcell and Daniel Purcell, the composer's brothers, died.
1726.	Purcell's son, Edward, organist of St. Margaret's, Westminster.
1737.	Edward Henry Purcell, grandson of the composer, a child of the Chapel Royal.
1738.	Purcell's son, Edward, organist of St. Margaret's, Westminster.
1740.	Edward died.
1753.	Edward Henry Purcell, grandson of the composer organist of St. John, Hackney.
1765.	Not re-elected to St. John, Hackney.

INDEX.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] John Milton the father of the poet was the author of a six-part madrigal, "Fayre Oriane in the Morne," printed in 1601, of four motets in Leighton's "Tears or Lamentacions" (1614), and of several Psalm tunes. He also composed an "In Nomine" in forty parts, for which he received a gold medal and chain from a Polish prince.

[2] In a room behind Rutland House, Aldersgate Street.

[3] "Instrumental and Cathedral music I have ever been wilfully ignorant of, because I have dearly loved them, and if I had learnt them to a perfection, this satiety might have bred a nauseous distaste and surfeit, as in other things, and then I had nothing to delight in. But alas! this conceit hath failed me, for now all church music my highest terrene content is abandoned amongst us ."— Philip King's "Surfeit," 1656.

[4] They acted together in "The Siege of Rhodes" in 1656.

[5] His name appears in the cheque-book of the Chapel Royal as Henry Purcill , and from the same source we learn that he, in common with the other gentlemen of the Chapel, received (each of them), four yards of fine scarlet cloth for a gown to wear at the coronation.

[6] George Dalham, a well-known organ builder. Dr. Rimbault says Father Smith built the organ erected in West ^r Abbey at the Restoration, but this payment would suggest a doubt as to his accuracy.

[7] Hill played the treble parts on the cornet in consequence of the difficulty previously mentioned, of obtaining efficient boys. He was buried in the cloisters of W. A., in 1667.

[8] Christopher Gibbons, son of the celebrated Orlando Gibbons, was organist of Winchester Cathedral in the reign of Charles I., but on the breaking out of the civil war he became a soldier. He was admitted Doctor of Music at Oxford, by the special desire of Charles II.

[9] Where the word "nil" now stands in the MS. there has evidently been an erasure of some figure or figures.

[10] Harl. MSS. 1911.

[11] Cooke performed the part of "Solyman" in The Siege of Rhodes , in 1656, and also composed the music for the second and third acts of the opera.

[12] Wood, M.S. Ashmole, 8568.

[13] A copy of this birthday Ode, in the handwriting of Pelham Humphreys, was in the possession of the late Dr. Rimbault.

[14] In my own library.—W. H. C.

[15] Johnson's music is printed in Stafford Smith's Musica Antiqua .

[16] Spelt variously, Humfrey, Humphrey, Humphries.

[17] The following entries are from the account of Secret Service moneys kept by Sir John Shaw:—

"1664. To Pelham Humphreys, to defray the charge of his journey to France and Italy, 200 l. "

"1665. To Pelham Humphreys, bounty 100 l. "

"1666. To Pelham Humphreys, bounty 150 l. "

[18] Louis Grabut.

[19] Dr. Burney is particularly severe in condemning Blow's "crudites and violations of rule," and prints four pages of examples of Blow's sins; but there can be little doubt that a musician of the present day would regard the faults as mere spots on the sun of Blow's splendid music. Those who care to see what Blow could write should look at the anthems, "I was in the Spirit," and "I beheld, and lo."

[20] For a list of Copyists of Westminster Abbey, see p. 112.

[21] I am indebted to the late Dr. Rimbault for a copy of this letter.

[22] He was succeeded by the Rev. William Tucker, Minor Canon of the Abbey, and Priest of the Chapel Royal, an excellent composer, who died in 1689. The following entry refers to his work:—

"In moneys rec ^d . and paid for secret services of Charles II."

"To Eliza Tucker, wid ^o relict of W ^m . Tucker, for her husband's writing in 15 books, the anthems with symphonies for King Charles the 2 ^nds use in his Chappell Royal, 15 l. "

[23] The original of this letter is in my possession.—W. H. C.

[24] 1678 by the old style, but 1679 by the new.

[25] The music was published in a collection called The Catch Club; or, Merry Companions .

[26] For a list of the Organists of Westminster Abbey, see p. 111.

[27] In 1794 S. Harding published a portrait of "Henry Purcell, musician and actor," copied from the original in Dulwich College. I have made diligent search for the painting without success.—W. H. C.

[28] Know all men by these presents that I, Thomas Purcell, of the Parish of St. Martin's-in-the-Fields, in the County of Middx., one of the gentlemen of his Ma ^ts Chappell Royall, and servant to his Ma ^tle , have assign'd, ordain'd, and made, by these presents doe assigne, ordayne, and make my trusty and well beloved son, Mathew Purcell, my true and lawful Attorney for me and in my name, and to my use to aske, take, and receive all such arrears and summes of money as are due, and hereafter will become due and payable to me the said Thomas Purcell out of his Ma ^ts Treasury, Chamb ^r Exchequer, Coffery office, or any other place or office whatsomever, giving, and by these presents granting unto my s ^d Attorney my whole Power and authority in and about the premisses, and upon Rec ^t of any such summes of money aforesaid, Acquittance, or other discharges for me and in my name to make and give, and for me and in my name to doe and performe as fully and largely in every respect to all intents and purposes as I myself might or could doe if I were there personally present, ratifying, confirming, and allowing all and whatsomever my said Attorney shall lawfully do or cause to be done in and about the premisses aforesaid by Vertue of these presents. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seale, this 15th day of May in the three-and-thirtieth yeare of King Charles the Second over England, &c. Annoq. Domini 1681. T. Purcell .

Sealed and delivered in the
presence of

F. P urcell .
Witt. Walley.

[29] Giovanni Baptista Draghi, born in Italy, came to England about the middle of the 17th century, and at the death of Matthew Locke he obtained the appointment of organist to Catherine of Braganza, wife of Charles II. Draghi was in great request as a performer and teacher of the harpsichord; amongst his pupils were the Princess Anne and probably her sister Mary. He was a good composer, and had by diligent study made himself well acquainted with the compositions of the best English masters whose manner of composing he adopted. He set to music an Ode written by Dryden for St. Cecilia's day, 1687, and in contemporary copies of the words we find his name anglicised to John Baptist Draghi.

[30] This we learn from several advertisements of later date, where it is stated, "At John Carr's shop may be had the musical entertainment for last St. Cecilia's Day. The words made by Mr. Christopher Fishburn, and set to music in two, three, four, and six parts by Mr. Henry Purcell, Composer in Ordinary to His Sacred Majesty, and one of the Organists of His Majesty's Chappel Royal."

[31] Smith was organist of St. Margaret, Westminster.

[32] So spelt in the registers of Westminster Abbey, but "Banester" on his monument.

[33] See No. 15 of The Ancient Vocal Music of England , by E. F. Rimbault, published by Novello & Co.

[34] See Concordia , April 15 and 22, 1876.

[35] Apology for the Life of Colley Cibber.

[36] History of Music , Novello's Edition, vol. ii. p. 743.

[37] " The Songs in Amphitryon, with the Musick. Composed by Mr. Henry Purcell. London: printed by J. Heptinstall for Jacob Tonson, at the Judge's Head in Chancery Lane. MDCXC."

[38] Dioclesian.

[39] North, in the Memoires of Musick , 1728, mentions Purcell's King Arthur as at that time "unhappily lost."

[40] Round about Piccadilly , by Wheatley, p. 294.

[41] Hawkins's History of Music , vol. ii. p. 753.

[42] See Sir Walter Scott's Life of Dryden .

[43] Hogarth's Memoirs of the Musical Drama , 1838.

[44] Reading and Pate some three years afterwards figured in another kind of Duo; the Post-Boy , June 20th, 1695, has the following paragraph:—"I am informed that the Lord Chamberlain hath been pleased to displace Mr. Pate and Mr. Reading from their places in the Playhouse for being in the late riot at Drury Lane." The riot had occurred at the "Dog Tavern," and in consequence several persons were prosecuted and found guilty; some were fined 500 marks each, but Reading and Pate were fined only twenty marks each; probably their fines were reduced in consideration of their dismissal by the Lord Chamberlain. They were, however, soon afterwards reinstated in their previous appointments.

[45] Nichol's Select Collection of Poems.

[46] In the thirteenth edition published in 1697, the third part has the following heading:—"The art of Descant, or composing musick in parts; made very plain and easie by the late Mr. Henry Purcell."

[47] The last piece Dryden wrote for the stage.

[48] The music was published by Walsh with the following new title, "Te Deum et Jubilate for voices and instruments perform'd before the Sons of the Clergy at the Cathedral Church of St. Paul. Composed by the late Mr. Henry Purcel." This led to a notion that the music had been composed for the "Sons of the Clergy" festival.

[49] This third part is so scarce that probably only one or two perfect copies now exist.

[50] In my own library.

[51] It is evident from this will that Purcell's youngest child, Mary Peters, had died since her father's decease.

[52] Anecdotes, Biographical Sketches , by Letitia Matilda Hawkins.

[53] "The English affect more the Italian than the French music, and their own compositions are between the gravity of the first and the levity of the other. They have had several great masters of their own. Henry Purcell's works in that kind are esteemed beyond Lully's everywhere, and they have now a good many very eminent masters; but the taste of the town being at this day all Italian, it is a great discouragement to them."— Mackay's Journey Through England , 1722-3.

[54] Dr. King's Bibliotheca , 1712.

[55] The flute of Purcell's day was blown at the extreme end like a flageolet, the modern flauto traverso was unknown.

[56] Stafford Smith's Collection of English Songs , 1779.

[57] Purcell is named as one of the possessors of property in a map of Ireland made about the middle of the seventeenth century.

[58] Cosyn usually meant nephew.

[59] Meaning buried in the Church.

[60] The autograph score is in the British Museum.

[61] "On Wednesday next will be performed at York Buildings Mr. Daniel Purcell's musick, made for last St. Cecilia's Feast, for the benefit of Mr. Howel and Mr. Shore, with an addition of new vocal and instrumental musick."— London Gazette , December 29, 1698.

[62] 1700 according to the new style.

[63] A pupil of Henry Purcell.

[64] "A Song sung by Mr. Mason in Magbeth , sett by Mr. D. Purcell, 'Cease, gentle Swain,' in the Queen's library, Buckingham Palace."

[65] Vol. ii. p. 759, new Edition. Novello & Co.

[66] Extracted from the Vestry books of St. Andrew's, Holborn.

[67] Baker's History of Northamptonshire , vol. i. p. 17.

[68] "Frances, daughter of Leonard Welsted, Gent, and Frances his wife."

[69] 1750.

[70] The master was Bernard Gates.

[71] Mr. Turle having retired from active duty, Dr. J. F. Bridge is now appointed permanent deputy organist.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE GREAT MUSICIANS: PURCELL ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org . If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate .

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org .

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.


On All Saints day	39 s.
The first of November	"
Christmas day	"
Epiphany	"	£ s.
Candlemas day	"	8 12
Lady day	"
Easter day	"
Whitson day	"
St. Peter's day	"

Mr.	G. Haydon	/
"	C. Young
"	Edward Pursil
"	John Isham	///////////

Mr. Edward Henry Purcell	9	Votes.
Mr. David L. Heureux	6	"
Mr. William Ward	2	"
Mr. Richard Low	0	"
Mr. Thomas Archer	1	"
Mr. Moses Patence	0	"

NAME	DATE
John Howe	1549
Master Whitt	1560
John Taylor	1562
Robert White	1570
Henry Leeve	1575
Edmund Hooper, the first regular appointment as Organist	1588
John Parsons	1621
Orlando Gibbons	1623
Thomas Day	1625
Richard Portman	1633
Christopher Gibbons	1660
Albertus Bryne	1666
John Blow	1669
Henry Purcell	1680
John Blow	1695
William Croft	1708
John Robinson	1727
Benjamin Cooke	1762
Samuel Arnold	1794
Robert Cooke	1803
George Ebenezer Williams	1815
Thomas Greatorex	1819
James Turle (living) [71]	1831

NAME	DATE
John Taylor	1562
Robert White	1574
Henry Leeve	1575
Edmund Hooper	1585
John Gibbs	1605
John Parsons	1613 [Pg 112]
Thomas Day	1623
Richard Portman	1633
James Trye	1637
Walter Porter	1639
Henry Purcell (senior)	1661
Christopher Gibbons	1664
Thomas Blagrave	1666
Edward Braddock	1670
John Church	1704
Bernard Gates	1740

	£	s.	d.
Tho. Mr. Purcell } Pelham Mr. Humphreys }	200	0	0
Jo ⁿ . Mr. Hardinge	40	0	0
W ^m . Mr. Howes	46	10	10
Tho. Mr. Blagrave, Seig ^r .	40	9	2
Alphonso Mr. March	40	0	0
Jo ⁿ . Mr. Goodgroome	40	0	0
Nat. Mr. Wattkins	40	0	0
Math. Mr. Lock	40	0	0
Jo ⁿ . Mr. Clayton	152	13	4
Isaac Mr. Stagins, Seig ^r .	46	10	10
Nich. Mr. Stagings, Jun ^r .	46	10	10
Tho. Mr. Battes	90	0	0
John Mr. Lilly	40	0	0
Hen. Mr. Gregory	60	0	0
Theophilus Mr. Hills	46	10	10
Henry Mr. Madge	86	12	8
John Mr. Gombell	46	10	10
Rich ^d . Mr. Dorney	20	0	0
Jo ⁿ . Mr. Banister, Seig ^r .	100	0	0
Phil. Mr. Beckett	60	2	6
Ro ^b . Mr. Blagrave, Jun ^r .	58	14	2
John Mr. Singleton	46	10	10
Robt. Mr. Strange	46	10	10

Mr.	Short
"	Isham
"	Young
"	Green	//////
"	Pursill
"	Haydon
"	Harris
"	Hart