The Project Gutenberg eBook of Index of the Project Gutenberg Works of Immanuel Kant

This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org . If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title : Index of the Project Gutenberg Works of Immanuel Kant

Author : Immanuel Kant

Editor : David Widger

Release date : March 6, 2019 [eBook #59023]
Most recently updated: April 6, 2023

Language : English

Credits : Produced by David Widger

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK INDEX OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG WORKS OF IMMANUEL KANT *** 

  

   

   

  

  

   INDEX OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG
   

   

   WORKS OF
   

   

   IMMANUEL KANT
  

  

   

   

  

  

   Compiled by David Widger
  

  

   

   

  

  

   KANT
   

  

  

   
    
   
  

  

   

   

  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   Click on the
   
    
     ##
    
   
   before each of the titles to view a
      linked
   

   table of contents for that volume.
  

  

   Click on the title itself to open the original online file.
  

  

   
    

     
      
       
        
         ##
        
       
      
      
       
        THE
          CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON
       
      
      

      

      
       
        
         ##
        
       
      
      
       
        THE
          CRITIQUE OF PRACTICAL REASON
       
      
      

      

      
       
        
         ##
        
       
      
      
       
        FUNDAMENTAL
          PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS
       
      
      

      

      
       
        
         ##
        
       
      
      
       
        THE
          METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS
       
      
      

      

      
       
        
         ##
        
       
      
      
       
        THE
          INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS
       
      
      

      

      
       
        
         ##
        
       
      
      
       
        CRITIQUE
          OF JUDGEMENT
       
      
      

      

      
       
        
         ##
        
       
      
      
       
        PERPETUAL
          PEACE
       
      
      

      

      
       
        
         ##
        
       
      
      
       
        PROLEGOMENA
       
      
      

      

     		
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

   

  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   TABLES OF CONTENTS OF VOLUMES
  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   
   
  

  

   THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON
  

  

   By Immanuel Kant
  

  

   Translated by J. M. D. Meiklejohn
  

  

   

   

  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   
    

     
      
       
        
         Preface to the First Edition (1781)
        
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       
        
         Preface to the Second Edition (1787)
        
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       
        
         Introduction
        
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. Of the difference between Pure and Empirical Knowledge
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. The Human Intellect, even in an Unphilosophical State, is in
          Possession of Certain Cognitions "a priori".
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science which shall Determine the
          Possibility, Principles, and Extent of Human Knowledge "a priori"
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical and Synthetical Judgements.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgements "a
          priori" are contained as Principles.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science, under the Name of a
          Critique of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

  

  

   
    

     
      
       
        
         I. Transcendental Doctrine of Elements
        
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       First Part—TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 1. Introductory
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       SECTION I. OF SPACE
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 2. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 3. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Space.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 4. Conclusions from the foregoing Conceptions.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       SECTION II. OF TIME
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 5. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 6. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Time.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 7. Conclusions from the above Conceptions.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 8. Elucidation.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 9. General Remarks on Transcendental Aesthetic.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       § 10. Conclusion of the Transcendental Aesthetic.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Second Part—TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Introduction. Idea of a Transcendental Logic
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. Of Logic in General
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. Of Transcendental Logic
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       III. Of the Division of General Logic into Analytic and Dialectic
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic into Transcendental
          Analytic and Dialectic
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       FIRST DIVISION—TRANSCENDENTAL ANALYTIC
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       BOOK I. Analytic of Conceptions. § 2
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter I. Of the Transcendental Clue to the Discovery of all Pure
          Conceptions of the Understanding
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Introductory § 3
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section I. Of the Logical Use of the Understanding in General. § 4
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section II. Of the Logical Function of the Understanding in
          Judgements. § 5
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section III. Of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding, or
          Categories. § 6
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter II. Of the Deduction of the Pure Conception of the
          Understanding
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section I. Of the Principles of a Transcendental Deduction in general
          § 9
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Transition to the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. § 10
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section II Transcendental Deduction of the pure Conceptions of the
          Understanding.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Of the Possibility of a Conjunction of the manifold representations
          given by Sense. § 11.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Of the Originally Synthetical Unity of Apperception. § 12
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       The Principle of the Synthetical Unity of Apperception is the highest
          Principle of all exercise of the Understanding. § 13
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       What Objective Unity of Self-consciousness is. § 14
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       The Logical Form of all Judgements consists in the Objective Unity of
          Apperception of the Conceptions contained therein. § 15
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       All Sensuous Intuitions are subject to the Categories, as Conditions
          under which alone the manifold Content of them can be united in one
          Consciousness. § 16
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Observation. § 17
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       In Cognition, its Application to Objects of Experience is the only
          legitimate use of the Category. § 18
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Of the Application of the Categories to Objects of the Senses in
          general. § 20
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Transcendental Deduction of the universally possible employment in
          experience of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. § 22
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Result of this Deduction of the Conceptions of the Understanding. § 23
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       BOOK II. Analytic of Principles
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       INTRODUCTION. Of the Transcendental Faculty of judgement in General.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE FACULTY OF JUDGEMENT OR, ANALYTIC OF
          PRINCIPLES.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter I. Of the Schematism at of the Pure Conceptions of the
          Understanding.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter II. System of all Principles of the Pure Understanding.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section I. Of the Supreme Principle of all Analytical Judgements.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section II. Of the Supreme Principle of all Synthetical Judgements.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section III. Systematic Representation of all Synthetical Principles
          of the Pure Understanding.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter III Of the Ground of the Division of all Objects into
          Phenomena and Noumena.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       APPENDIX.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       SECOND DIVISION—TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC. INTRODUCTION.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. Of Transcendental Illusory Appearance.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. Of Pure Reason as the Seat of Transcendental Illusory Appearance.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC—BOOK I—OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF PURE
          REASON.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section I-Of Ideas in General.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section II. Of Transcendental Ideas.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section III. System of Transcendental Ideas.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC—BOOK II—OF THE DIALECTICAL
          PROCEDURE OF PURE REASON.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter I. Of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter II. The Antinomy of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section I. System of Cosmological Ideas.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section II. Antithetic of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section III. Of the Interest of Reason in these Self-contradictions.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section IV. Of the necessity imposed upon Pure Reason of presenting a
          Solution of its Transcendental Problems.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section V. Sceptical Exposition of the Cosmological Problems presented
          in the four Transcendental Ideas.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section VI. Transcendental Idealism as the Key to theSolution of Pure
          Cosmological Dialectic.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section VII. Critical Solution of the Cosmological Problem.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section VIII. Regulative Principle of Pure Reason in relation to the
          Cosmological Ideas.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section IX. Of the Empirical Use of the Regulative Principle of Reason
          with regard to the Cosmological Ideas.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the
          Composition of Phenomena in the Universe.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Division
          of a Whole given in Intuition.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       III. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the
          Deduction of Cosmical Events from their Causes.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IV. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the
          Dependence of Phenomenal Existences.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter III. The Ideal of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section I. Of the Ideal in General.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section II. Of the Transcendental Ideal (Prototypon Trancendentale).
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section III. Of the Arguments employed by Speculative Reason in Proof
          of the Existence of a Supreme Being.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section IV. Of the Impossibility of an Ontological Proof of the
          Existence of God.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section V. Of the Impossibility of a Cosmological Proof of the
          Existence of God.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section VI. Of the Impossibility of a Physico-Theological Proof.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section VII. Critique of all Theology based upon Speculative
          Principles of Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Appendix. Of the Regulative Employment of the Ideas of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

  

  

   
    

     
      
       
        
         II. Transcendental Doctrine of Method
        
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter I. The Discipline of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section I. The Discipline of Pure Reason in the Sphere of Dogmatism.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section II. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Polemics.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section III. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Hypothesis.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section IV. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Relation to Proofs.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter II. The Canon of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section I. Of the Ultimate End of the Pure Use of Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section II. Of the Ideal of the Summum Bonum as a Determining Ground
          of the Ultimate End of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Section III. Of Opinion, Knowledge, and Belief.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter III. The Architectonic of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Chapter IV. The History of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   
   
  

  

   THE CRITIQUE OF PRACTICAL REASON
  

  

   By Immanuel Kant
  

  

   1788
  

  

   Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott
  

  

   

   

  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   
    

     
      
       PREFACE.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       INTRODUCTION.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Of the Idea of a Critique of Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       
        FIRST PART — ELEMENTS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON.
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       
        BOOK I. The Analytic of Pure Practical Reason.
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       CHAPTER I. Of the Principles of Pure Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. DEFINITION.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. THEOREM I.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       III. THEOREM II.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK I.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK II.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IV. THEOREM II.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       V. PROBLEM I.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VII. FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE PURE PRACTICAL REASON.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       COROLLARY.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VIII. THEOREM IV.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK II.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Practical Material Principles of Determination taken as the Foundation
          of Morality, are:
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. Of the Deduction of the Fundamental Principles of Pure
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. Of the Right that Pure Reason in its Practical use has to an
          Extension which is not possible to it in its Speculative Use.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       CHAPTER II. Of the Concept of an Object of Pure Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Table of the Categories of Freedom relatively to the Notions of Good
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Of the Typic of the Pure Practical Judgement.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       CHAPTER III. Of the Motives of Pure Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Critical Examination of the Analytic of Pure Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       
        BOOK II. Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason.
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       CHAPTER I. Of a Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason Generally.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       CHAPTER II. Of the Dialectic of Pure Reason in defining the Conception
          of the "Summum Bonum".
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. The Antinomy of Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. Critical Solution of the Antinomy of Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       III. Of the Primacy of Pure Practical Reason in its Union with the
          Speculative Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IV. The Immortality of the Soul as a Postulate of Pure Practical
          Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       V. The Existence of God as a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VI. Of the Postulates of Pure Practical Reason Generally.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VII. How is it possible to conceive an Extension of Pure Reason in a
          Practical point of view, without its Knowledge as Speculative being
          enlarged at the same time?
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VIII. Of Belief from a Requirement of Pure Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IX. Of the Wise Adaptation of Man's Cognitive Faculties to his
          Practical Destination.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       
        SECOND PART. -- METHODOLOGY OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON.
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Methodology of Pure Practical Reason.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       CONCLUSION.
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   
   
  

  

   FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS
  

  

   By Immanuel Kant
  

  

   1785
  

  

   Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott
  

  

   

  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   
    

     
      
       PREFACE
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       FIRST SECTION—TRANSITION FROM THE COMMON RATIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF
          MORALITY TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       SECOND SECTION—TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE
          METAPHYSIC OF MORALS
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       The Autonomy of the Will as the Supreme Principle of Morality
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Heteronomy of the Will as the Source of all spurious Principles of
          Morality
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Classification of all Principles of Morality which can be founded on
          the Conception of Heteronomy
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       THIRD SECTION—TRANSITION FROM THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS TO THE
          CRITIQUE OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       The Concept of Freedom is the Key that explains the Autonomy of the
          Will
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Freedom must be presupposed as a Property of the Will of all Rational
          Beings
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Of the Interest attaching to the Ideas of Morality
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       How is a Categorical Imperative Possible?
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Of the Extreme Limits of all Practical Philosophy.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       CONCLUDING REMARK
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   
   
  

  

   THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS
  

  

   By Immanuel Kant
  

  

   1780
  

  

   Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott
  

  

   

  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   
    

     
      
       PREFACE
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       
        INTRODUCTION TO THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. Exposition of the Conception of Ethics
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. Exposition of the Notion of an End which is also a Duty
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       III. Of the Reason for conceiving an End which is also a Duty
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IV. What are the Ends which are also Duties?
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       V. Explanation of these two Notions
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       A. OUR OWN PERFECTION
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       B. HAPPINESS OF OTHERS
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VI. Ethics does not supply Laws for Actions (which is done by
          Jurisprudence), but only for the Maxims of Action
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VII. Ethical Duties are of indeterminate, Juridical Duties of strict,
          Obligation
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VIII. Exposition of the Duties of Virtue as Intermediate Duties
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       (1) OUR OWN PERFECTION as an end which is also a duty
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       (2) HAPPINESS OF OTHERS as an end which is also a duty
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IX. What is a Duty of Virtue?
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       X. The Supreme Principle of Jurisprudence was Analytical; that of
          Ethics is Synthetical
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       XI. According to the preceding Principles, the Scheme of Duties of
          Virtue may be thus exhibited
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       XII. Preliminary Notions of the Susceptibility of the Mind for Notions
          of Duty generally
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       A. THE MORAL FEELING
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       B. OF CONSCIENCE
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       C. OF LOVE TO MEN
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       XIII. General Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals in the treatment
          of Pure Ethics
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       XIV. Of Virtue in General
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       XV. Of the Principle on which Ethics is separated from Jurisprudence
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARKS
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Of the Doctrine of Virtue on the Principle Of Internal Freedom.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       XVI. Virtue requires, first of all, Command over Oneself
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       XVII. Virtue necessarily presupposes Apathy (considered as Strength)
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       REMARK
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       
        ON CONSCIENCE
       
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   
   
  

  

   OF THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS
  

  

   By Immanuel Kant
  

  

   

   

  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   
    

     
      
       OF THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I. Deduction of the Editor's Right against the Counterfeiter
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Proof of the Major
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Proof of the Minor
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II. Refutation of the Counterfeiter's pretended Right against the
          Editor.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Proof of the Major
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Proof of the Minor
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Universal Observation
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   
   
  

  

   KANT'S CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT
  

  

   Translated With Introduction And Notes
   

   By J. H. Bernard, D.D., D.C.L.
      Bishop Of Ossory
  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   
    

     
      
       Editor's Introduction
      
     
     
      
       xi
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Preface
      
     
     
      
       1
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Introduction
      
     
     
      
       7
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       I.
      
     
     
      Of the division of Philosophy
     
     
      
       7
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       II.
      
     
     
      Of the realm of Philosophy in general
     
     
      
       11
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       III.
      
     
     
      Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two parts of
          Philosophy into a whole
     
     
      
       14
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IV.
      
     
     
      Of Judgement as a faculty legislating
      
       a priori
      
     
     
      
       17
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       V.
      
     
     
      The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a
          transcendental principle of Judgement
     
     
      
       20
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VI.
      
     
     
      Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the
          purposiveness of nature
     
     
      
       27
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VII.
      
     
     
      Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature
     
     
      
       30
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       VIII.
      
     
     
      Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature
     
     
      
       35
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       IX.
      
     
     
      Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of
          Reason by means of the Judgement
     
     
      
       39
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       First Part.
      
      —
      
       Critique
          of the Aesthetical Judgement
      
     
     
      
       43
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       First Division.
      
      —Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement
     
     
      
       45
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       First Book.
      
      —Analytic of the Beautiful
     
     
      
       45
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       First Moment
      
      of the judgement of taste, according to quality
     
     
      
       45
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?1.
     
     
      The judgement of taste is aesthetical
     
     
      
       45
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?2.
     
     
      The satisfaction which determines the judgement of taste is
          disinterested
     
     
      
       46
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?3.
     
     
      The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest
     
     
      
       48
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?4.
     
     
      The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest
     
     
      
       50
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?5.
     
     
      Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction
     
     
      
       53
      
      
       
        vi
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Second Moment
      
      of the judgement of taste, viz. according to
          quantity
     
     
      
       55
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?6.
     
     
      The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the
          object of a universal satisfaction
     
     
      
       55
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?7.
     
     
      Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of
          the above characteristic
     
     
      
       57
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?8.
     
     
      The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of
          Taste only as subjective
     
     
      
       59
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § ?9.
     
     
      Investigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the
          feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object
     
     
      
       63
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Third Moment
      
      of judgements of taste according to the relation
          of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein
     
     
      
       67
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 10.
     
     
      Of purposiveness in general
     
     
      
       67
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 11.
     
     
      The judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the
          purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation)
     
     
      
       69
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 12.
     
     
      The judgement of taste rests on
      
       a priori
      
      grounds
     
     
      
       70
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 13.
     
     
      The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion
     
     
      
       72
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 14.
     
     
      Elucidation by means of examples
     
     
      
       73
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 15.
     
     
      The judgement of taste is quite independent of the concept of
          perfection
     
     
      
       77
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 16.
     
     
      The judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful
          under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure
     
     
      
       81
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 17.
     
     
      Of the Ideal of Beauty
     
     
      
       84
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Fourth Moment
      
      of the judgement of taste, according to the
          modality of the satisfaction in the object
     
     
      
       91
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 18.
     
     
      What the modality in a judgement of taste is
     
     
      
       91
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 19.
     
     
      The subjective necessity which we ascribe to the judgement of taste is
          conditioned
     
     
      
       92
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 20.
     
     
      The condition of necessity which a judgement of taste asserts is the
          Idea of a common sense
     
     
      
       92
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 21.
     
     
      Have we ground for presupposing a common sense?
     
     
      
       93
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 22.
     
     
      The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a
          judgement of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as
          objective under the presupposition of a common sense
     
     
      
       94
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       General remark
      
      on the first section of the Analytic
     
     
      
       96
      
      
       
        vii
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Second Book.
      
      —Analytic of the Sublime
     
     
      
       101
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 23.
     
     
      Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that
          which judges of the Sublime
     
     
      
       101
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 24.
     
     
      Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the Sublime
     
     
      
       105
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      A.—Of the Mathematically Sublime
     
     
      
       106
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 25.
     
     
      Explanation of the term "Sublime"
     
     
      
       106
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 26.
     
     
      Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is
          requisite for the Idea of the Sublime
     
     
      
       110
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 27.
     
     
      Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgements upon the Sublime
     
     
      
       119
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      B.—Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature
     
     
      
       123
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 28.
     
     
      Of Nature regarded as Might
     
     
      
       123
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 29.
     
     
      Of the modality of the judgement upon the sublime in nature
     
     
      
       130
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       General remark
      
      upon the exposition of the aesthetical
          reflective Judgement
     
     
      
       132
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Deduction
      
      of [pure] aesthetical judgements
     
     
      
       150
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 30.
     
     
      The Deduction of aesthetical judgements on the objects of nature must
          not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the
          Beautiful
     
     
      
       150
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 31.
     
     
      Of the method of deduction of judgements of taste
     
     
      
       152
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 32.
     
     
      First peculiarity of the judgement of taste
     
     
      
       154
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 33.
     
     
      Second peculiarity of the judgement of taste
     
     
      
       157
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 34.
     
     
      There is no objective principle of taste possible
     
     
      
       159
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 35.
     
     
      The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgement in
          general
     
     
      
       161
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 36.
     
     
      Of the problem of a Deduction of judgements of Taste
     
     
      
       162
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 37.
     
     
      What is properly asserted
      
       a priori
      
      of an object in a judgement
          of taste
     
     
      
       164
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 38.
     
     
      Deduction of judgements of taste
     
     
      
       165
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 39.
     
     
      Of the communicability of a sensation
     
     
      
       167
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 40.
     
     
      Of taste as a kind of
      
       sensus communis
      
     
     
      
       169
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 41.
     
     
      Of the empirical interest in the Beautiful
     
     
      
       173
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 42.
     
     
      Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful
     
     
      
       176
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 43.
     
     
      Of Art in general
     
     
      
       183
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 44.
     
     
      Of beautiful Art
     
     
      
       185
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 45.
     
     
      Beautiful art is an art in so far as it seems like nature
     
     
      
       187
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 46.
     
     
      Beautiful art is the art of genius
     
     
      
       188
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 47.
     
     
      Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius
     
     
      
       190
      
      
       
        viii
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 48.
     
     
      Of the relation of Genius to Taste
     
     
      
       193
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 49.
     
     
      Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius
     
     
      
       197
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 50.
     
     
      Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful
          Art
     
     
      
       205
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 51.
     
     
      Of the division of the beautiful arts
     
     
      
       206
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 52.
     
     
      Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product
     
     
      
       214
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 53.
     
     
      Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts
     
     
      
       215
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 54.
     
     
      Remark
     
     
      
       220
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Second Division.
      
      —Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgement
     
     
      
       229
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 55.
     
     
     
     
      
       229
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 56.
     
     
      Representation of the antinomy of Taste
     
     
      
       230
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 57.
     
     
      Solution of the antinomy of Taste
     
     
      
       231
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 58.
     
     
      Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both Nature and Art as the
          unique principle of the aesthetical Judgement
     
     
      
       241
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 59.
     
     
      Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality
     
     
      
       248
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 60.
     
     
      
       Appendix
      
      :—Of the method of Taste
     
     
      
       253
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Second Part.
      
      —
      
       Critique
          of the Teleological Judgement
      
     
     
      
       257
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 61.
     
     
      Of the objective purposiveness of Nature
     
     
      
       259
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       First Division.
      
      —Analytic of the Teleological Judgement
     
     
      
       262
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 62.
     
     
      Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished
          from that which is material
     
     
      
       262
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 63.
     
     
      Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of
          nature
     
     
      
       268
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 64.
     
     
      Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes
     
     
      
       272
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 65.
     
     
      Things regarded as natural purposes are organised beings
     
     
      
       275
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 66.
     
     
      Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised
          beings
     
     
      
       280
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 67.
     
     
      Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a
          system of purposes
     
     
      
       282
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 68.
     
     
      Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science
     
     
      
       287
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Second Division.
      
      —Dialectic of the Teleological Judgement
     
     
      
       292
      
      
       
        ix
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 69.
     
     
      What is an antinomy of the Judgement?
     
     
      
       292
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 70.
     
     
      Representation of this antinomy
     
     
      
       293
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 71.
     
     
      Preliminary to the solution of the above antinomy
     
     
      
       296
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 72.
     
     
      Of the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of Nature
     
     
      
       298
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 73.
     
     
      None of the above systems give what they pretend
     
     
      
       302
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 74.
     
     
      The reason that we cannot treat the concept of a Technic of nature
          dogmatically is the fact that a natural purpose is inexplicable
     
     
      
       306
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 75.
     
     
      The concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical
          principle of Reason for the reflective Judgement
     
     
      
       309
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 76.
     
     
      Remark
     
     
      
       313
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 77.
     
     
      Of the peculiarity of the human Understanding, by means of which the
          concept of a natural purpose is possible
     
     
      
       319
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 78.
     
     
      Of the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter
          with the teleological principle in the Technic of nature
     
     
      
       326
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       Appendix.
      
      —Methodology of the Teleological Judgement
     
     
      
       334
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 79.
     
     
      Whether Teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine of
          nature
     
     
      
       334
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 80.
     
     
      Of the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological
          principle in the explanation of a thing as a natural purpose
     
     
      
       336
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 81.
     
     
      Of the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the
          explanation of a natural purpose as a natural product
     
     
      
       342
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 82.
     
     
      Of the teleological system in the external relations of organised
          beings
     
     
      
       346
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 83.
     
     
      Of the ultimate purpose of nature as a teleological system
     
     
      
       352
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 84.
     
     
      Of the final purpose of the existence of a world,
      
       i.e.
      
      of
          creation itself
     
     
      
       359
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 85.
     
     
      Of Physico-theology
     
     
      
       362
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 86.
     
     
      Of Ethico-theology
     
     
      
       370
      
      
       
        x
       
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 87.
     
     
      Of the moral proof of the Being of God
     
     
      
       377
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 88.
     
     
      Limitation of the validity of the moral proof
     
     
      
       384
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 89.
     
     
      Of the use of the moral argument
     
     
      
       392
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 90.
     
     
      Of the kind of belief in a teleological proof of the Being of God
     
     
      
       395
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      § 91.
     
     
      Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith
     
     
      
       403
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       General remark
      
      on Teleology
     
     
      
       414
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   
   
  

  

   PERPETUAL PEACE, A PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAY
  

  

   By Immanuel Kant
  

  

   1795
  

  

   Translated With Introduction And Notes By M. Campbell Smith
  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   
    

     
      
       PAGE
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      PREFACE BY PROFESSOR LATTA
     
     
      
       v
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      TRANSLATOR'S INTRODUCTION
     
     
      
       1
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      PERPETUAL PEACE
     
     
      
       106
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      FIRST SECTION CONTAINING THE PRELIMINARY ARTICLES OF PERPETUAL PEACE
          BETWEEN STATES
     
     
      
       107
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      SECOND SECTION CONTAINING THE DEFINITIVE ARTICLES OF PERPETUAL PEACE
          BETWEEN STATES
     
     
      
       117
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      FIRST SUPPLEMENT CONCERNING THE GUARANTEE OF PERPETUAL PEACE
     
     
      
       143
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      SECOND SUPPLEMENT-A SECRET ARTICLE FOR PERPETUAL PEACE
     
     
      
       158
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      APPENDIX I.-ON THE DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN MORALS AND POLITICS WITH
          REFERENCE TO PERPETUAL PEACE
     
     
      
       161
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      APPENDIX II.-CONCERNING THE HARMONY OF POLITICS WITH MORALS ACCORDING
          TO THE TRANSCENDENTAL IDEA OF PUBLIC RIGHT
     
     
      
       184
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      INDEX
     
     
      
       197
      
     
     
     
    

   
  

  

   

   

  

  

  

   

   

  

  

   
   
  

  

   PROLEGOMENA
  

  

   By Kant
  

  

   Edited In English By Dr. Paul Carus
  

  

   CONTENTS
  

  

   
    

     
      
       PUBLISHERS' PREFACE.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       INTRODUCTION.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       PROLEGOMENA.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      PREAMBLE ON THE PECULIARITIES OF ALL METAPHYSICAL COGNITION.
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       FIRST PART OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      HOW IS PURE MATHEMATICS POSSIBLE?
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       SECOND PART OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      HOW IS THE SCIENCE OF NATURE POSSIBLE?
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       THIRD PART OF THE MAIN TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      HOW IS METAPHYSICS IN GENERAL POSSIBLE?
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       SCHOLIA.
      
     
     
     
    

    

     
      SOLUTION OF THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE PROLEGOMENA, "HOW IS
          METAPHYSICS POSSIBLE AS A SCIENCE?"
     
     
     
    

    

     
      
       APPENDIX.