The Project Gutenberg eBook of Psychological Aspects of the Problem of Atmospheric Smoke Pollution
    
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: Psychological Aspects of the Problem of Atmospheric Smoke Pollution

Author: J. E. Wallace Wallin

Release date: March 21, 2022 [eBook #67675]

Language: English

Original publication: United States: University of Pittsburgh

Credits: Charlene Taylor and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/American Libraries.)


*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE PROBLEM OF ATMOSPHERIC SMOKE POLLUTION ***





Mellon Institute of Industrial Research and School of Specific
Industries


  Robert Kennedy Duncan, Sc.D.      Director.
  Raymond F. Bacon, Ph.D.           Associate Director.


STAFF OF THE SMOKE INVESTIGATION

  Raymond C. Benner, Ph.D.          Chief Fellow and Chemist.
  Joseph A. Beck, LL.B.             Attorney.
  A. B. Bellows, B.S.               Engineer.
  W. W. Blair, M.D.                 Physician.
  J. E. Clevenger, M.S.             Botanist.
  B. A. Cohoe, A.B., M.D.           Physician.
  E. W. Day, A.M., M.D.             Physician.
  S. R. Haythorn, M.D.              Physician.
  W. L. Holman, A.B., M.D.          Architect.
  Richard Hooker B.S.               Architect.
  C. T. Ingham                      Architect.
  Richard Kiehnel                   Architect.
  H. H. Kimball, Ph.D.              Meteorologist.
  Oskar Klotz, M.D., C.M.           Physician.
  E. B. Lee                         Architect.
  C. H. Marcy, A.B.                 Bacteriologist.
  O. R. McBride, B.S.               Engineer.
  E. H. McClelland, Ph.B.           Bibliographer.
  R. T. Miller, Jr., A.B., M.D.     Surgeon.
  A. F. Nesbit, B.S., A.M.          Engineer.
  J. J. O’Connor, Jr., A.B.         Economist.
  K. K. Stevens, B.S.               Chemist.
  A. A. Straub, M.E.                Engineer.
  Carlton Strong                    Architect.
  W. W. Strong, Ph.D.               Physicist.
  J. E. Wallace Wallin, Ph.D.       Psychologist.
  W. C. White, M.D.                 Physician.
  Ruth E. Gilchrist                 Secretary.




  Mellon Institute of Industrial Research and School of
  Specific Industries

  Smoke Investigation      Bulletin No. 3

  Psychological Aspects of the Problem of
  Atmospheric Smoke Pollution

  By
  J. E. Wallace Wallin, Ph. D.
  Director of Psychological Clinic, University of Pittsburgh

  University of Pittsburgh
  Pittsburgh, Pa.
  1913




Introduction


All that can be wisely attempted in an article which aims merely to
furnish a preliminary survey of the psychological aspects of the smoke
problem, is to outline the scope of the inquiry, to review briefly
the direct and indirect data, whether impressionistic, observational,
statistical or experimental, which bear on the problem and which
are already available in recorded observations or in literary and
scientific memoirs, and, finally, to suggest certain problems amenable
to statistical or experimental study.

The smoke palls of our industrial centers exert both a direct and
indirect influence upon the human organism. The direct influence is due
to the immediate contact of the smoke-contaminated and poison-laden
air with the skin, mucous membranes and sense organs of the body. The
indirect effects are traceable to the various meteorological states
which are due to smoke products in the atmosphere, and which in turn
directly influence the body. Frequently, possibly always, the smoke
conditions and the state of the atmosphere are so inextricably mixed
that the biological effects must be ascribed to the joint action of
both factors. Only in a controlled experiment would it be possible
absolutely to segregate, and thus separately to measure, the effects of
the smoke and meteorological factors of weather states. This has not
yet been attempted.

The mental effects due to atmospheric smoke and its related weather
states are likewise both direct and indirect. The indirect effects
are due to the influences exerted by smoke clouds and smoke-produced
weather states on the physiological organism--on health, well-being,
energy, freshness, potential reserve, sensori-motor efficiency--and to
the influences thus directly exerted by the changed bodily states on
the mind: on mental tension, balance, inhibition, impulse, inclination,
feeling, emotion, thought, and conduct. On the other hand, the direct
mental effects are traceable to the immediate influences, whether
conscious or unconscious, exerted on the individual’s mental action
by his own experiences--by the thoughts, feelings and impulses which
have been excited in him by various bodily states, sensations and
perceptions produced by cloud and weather conditions--or which have
been directly produced by processes of association and habit formation,
the latter of which have themselves been initiated by thoughts or
responses occasioned, in the first instance, by the physiological
effects of external influences. The action of the mind itself does have
a determining influence upon its own subsequent attitudes, beliefs,
propensities and habits. It is important that these direct effects of
the mind’s own action upon its subsequent behavior be recognized, for
much of the mental gloom and depression occasioned by dismal cosmic
influences has merely been initiated by the external stimuli. Their
peculiar intensity is largely due to the subject’s own introspections,
to his own stream of thought. The mental influences are often more
pronounced than the bodily influences, whether the mental influences
arise from somatic alterations or from introspective changes. Cosmic
states are, perhaps, less to be regarded as _causes_ of mental action
than _factors_ which may upset the emotional balance, lessen inhibition
and alter the train of thought and conduct.

It is also important to emphasize the fact that no hard and fast line
of demarcation can be drawn between the bodily and mental effects of
smoke-clouds or smoke-produced weather states. The human organism is a
psycho-biological unity, and we cannot, except in a purely artificial
and arbitrary fashion, divide the _soma_ and the _psyche_ into two
independent compartments. Bodily states normally influence mental
states and mental states, in turn, normally influence bodily processes,
particularly the functions of the glandular, circulatory, sexual and
neural systems.




I. The Pathology of Smoke

THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF SMOKE ON BODILY AND MENTAL
WELL-BEING.


_A. The direct effects of smoke on health and conduct._

When it is remembered that the average adult consumes about 30 cubic
inches of air in each inhalation or possibly 864,000 cubic inches
every day, it does not seem an exaggeration to say that more persons
are devitalized, disabled and poisoned by the impurities contained
in smoke-polluted air, than by the noxious ingredients in food and
water. Not only do the solid and vaporous ingredients of smoke-begrimed
air--noxious compounds of carbon, sulphur, nitrogen, chlorine, and
arsenic--irritate the sensitive membranes of the eyes, nose, throat
and lungs, and thus aggravate or cause inflammatory diseases of these
organs, or produce collapse of their sensitive tissues, or increase
their susceptibility to such specific diseases as bronchitis, pneumonia
and subacute forms of phthisis; but the poisonous compounds also
enter the gastro-intestinal tract, and this causes nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea and systemic poisoning. That the gastro-intestinal tract is
affected by inhaled solids has been demonstrated by the experiments
of Saito (19)[1] on dogs and rabbits which were compelled to inhale,
during periods varying from 1 to 33 hours, air charged with white lead
dust. Only from 4 to 24% of the dust was subsequently recovered from
the respiratory organs while the remainder was found in the digestive
organs. In the case of a man who inhaled the air from 10 to 15 minutes
on 20 occasions and who avoided acts of swallowing, 95% of the dust
remained in the body, 50% of which was primarily retained in the nares.
By processes of exclusion 12% probably found its way to the lungs, for
60 to 80% was recovered from the alimentary canal. Thus the principal
portal of entry of soluble inhaled dust appears to be the alimentary
canal.

The deleterious effects on the human system from inhalation of
smoke-polluted air, which contains not only acrid and irritating
solids, but a certain amount of deadly poisons, should be obvious from
a consideration of the comparatively great density of the impurities in
the atmosphere of industrial centers. The weight of the solid matter
in the soot-laden air at Leeds, England, has been found to be 1.2 mg.
per 100 cu. ft. of air, or 200 lbs. per sq. mi. (300 ft. high.) The
soot-fall per square mile per year has amounted to 220 tons in Leeds,
820 tons in Glasgow and 259 tons in London. Moreover, by means of the
dust counter the number of dust particles in the air at Leeds has been
found to vary from 530,000 to 3,736,000 per cu. inch. In manufacturing
cities the number of dust particles often exceeds 300,000 per cu. cm.
even in fine weather, as compared with a few hundred in the country
(Aitken, 4). A large percentage of these particles consists of the
soot from factory, locomotive and domestic fires. Not only are these
conditions, bad as they are, aggravated during foggy weather but on
moderately foggy days the quantity of solid organic impurities may be
increased 700% as compared with fine weather (Russell). During grimy,
opaque fogs, the conditions are still worse.

That the constant inhalation of poison-laden air, largely made up of
the soot particles which abound in manufacturing cities, diminishes the
potential reserve, the productive efficiency and the bodily well-being
of our city dwellers by causing specific diseases, has been abundantly
shown by various studies. The mortality from acute pulmonary diseases,
especially in children and old people, has increased, and the course
of pulmonary tuberculosis has been accelerated in Germany as the
country has become more industrial. The increase in non-tubercular lung
mortality has amounted to 30% in the smoky town of Waldenburg compared
with the nearby textile town of Wusterwaltersdorf (Ascher, 16). The
death rate per 10,000 for the same diseases is 30.6 in the non-smoky
city of Hamm as compared with 57.4 in the smoky city of Gelserkirchen.
In all German towns with a population of over 15,000 the death rate
is 24.0, while in the smoky industrial centers of similar size in
Rhenish Westphalia it is 34.0, and in the industrial districts in upper
Silesia it is 36.0 (Ascher, 4); in rural districts in England it is
17.5 compared with 26.5 in urban industrial districts(4). During the
anthracite strike in this country there was reported an increase of
suspected tubercular cases. In Rochester there was observed an increase
of pulmonary affections with the increase of the smoke nuisance
between 1895-1904. In Pittsburgh a recent investigation by Dr. W. C.
White shows that pneumonia increases with the density of atmospheric
smoke, irrespective of the density of population or of poverty. The
increase is as marked in the well-to-do as in the poorer sections with
relatively the same smoke density. In late years pneumonia has assumed
a very acute and fatal form in Pittsburgh.

That “much of human life, energy and happiness is wasted by the effects
of vapors, noxious because wasted, is now an established certainty”
(Gillespie, 8). It has been estimated that London’s annual smoke
tax amounts to $1,500,000 in death, disease and lowered working
capacity alone. Unfortunately up to the present time there has been
no scientific attempt made to directly measure the degree in which
the producing capacity and the bodily and mental efficiency of city
dwellers may be impaired by atmospheric impurities, nor has any effort
been made to measure the direct or indirect influences of smoke upon
sensory, motor, intellectual, affective and emotional functions, and
on the habits and conduct of human beings. A part of the human waste
caused by smoke-polluted air is certainly due to the irritation caused
by solid smoke particles. The functional efficiency of the visual,
naso-pharyngeal, pulmonary, gastro-intestinal and neural mechanisms,
may be more or less disabled by constant irritation by solid particles.
But it is likewise presumptively probable that irritating, acrid soot
particles and poisonous smoke compounds may become factors in causing
premature decay, untimely death, exaggerated fatigue, frequent
sickness, instability of attention, malcontent, irritability, lessened
self-control and possibly psychic disequilibrium. It is probable that
there goes on a gradual process of absorption by the human system of
the poisonous products of imperfect smoke combustion. This insensible
intake may not give rise to any definitely recognizable acute disorder
or specific disabilities. But the process of slow poisoning may
insidiously eat away like a mild canker at vital tissues and thus in
time deplete our potential reserve, thereby making it impossible for
body and brain to function at their points of maximal efficiency.
With an impaired brain the mind cannot reach its highest levels of
creative insight and constructive achievement. It has often been a
matter of comment that people who have lived in relatively smoke-free
cities after coming to live in a city like Pittsburgh, have experienced
a distinct disinclination to work, or a sort of chronic ennui. A
Pittsburgh business man writes that “people coming to Pittsburgh to
reside notice a great depression; likewise many residents of Pittsburgh
on visits find they feel infinitely better and business men working
for periods in cities where there is not the same smoke find they can
do twice as much work. These are not isolated cases but the result of
very general inquiry which I have made for a number of years.[2] People
very frequently remark on the depressed expression not only on the
working men of Pittsburgh, but they also observe it in the clubs. It
is very frequently referred to humidity, but this is entirely wrong as
the humidity in New York ranges much higher than in Pittsburgh. This
certainly is a condition that tends to keep people from coming here and
makes people desirous of leaving at the first opportunity.”

The writer of this essay has now lived in Pittsburgh somewhat over
a year and has experienced during this time a marked distaste or
disinclination to engage in productive authorship. Clear, trenchant,
reflective thinking seems to have been more difficult; and the attempt
to write concisely, incisively and perspicuously has seemed more
labored. Is it possible that the low esteem in which Pittsburgh is
held in the world of productive scholarship--a matter of occasional
remark among medical men and other scientists--is due to the fact that
the air which its scientists must breathe is polluted and poisoned
by smoke? [There are other contributory factors, as we shall see in
the following sections, viz., the various devitalizing weather states
induced by smoke, and possibly the common use of convection heat from
gas stoves in the living rooms. Convection heat from gas stoves, it
is maintained by Scotch investigators, is more injurious than heat by
radiation (21).] Is it possible that the highest spiritual creations
of the citizens of smoke-begrimed cities are being sacrificed on the
altar of commercial greed? Is it possible that, in the interests of
a pseudo-economy, we are impairing the very brains of the people by
permitting our breathing air to be saturated with the poisons of
preventable fumes? Is it possible that the industrial energy for which
Pittsburgh has become famous is less due to the surpassing excellence
of the brain and brawn of its workers than to the munificent bounty
of its mines? We shall probably not be able to offer any satisfactory
answer to questions such as these until a series of controlled
psychological experiments on efficiency, fatigue, and endurance (in
so far as various motor, sensory, and intellectual functions are
concerned), have been carried out under varying degrees of density of
atmospheric smoke.


_B. The indirect influences of smoke on mental and physical well-being;
the meteorological aspects of atmospheric smoke contamination._

I shall first discuss the meteorological variations produced by
smoke, and then the effects of the smoke-produced weather states upon
well-being.

The smoke-clouds of our cities influence a number of weather states
which affect human conduct. The meteorological conditions particularly
affected are: sunshine, clouds, humidity, fogs, temperature, electrical
potential and luminosity. That the smoke from factory and domestic
fires, by filling the atmosphere with opaque clouds of smoke and by
inducing mists and fogs, deprives the city dwellers of the luminous,
vitalizing, cheering, health giving, germicidal rays of the sun, has
been proved by numerous observations and tests. It has been computed
that seven-eighths of the sun’s power is shut out by the smoke in the
manufacturing center of London, and five-eighths in Westminster. The
percentage of sunshine in these two places compared with the rural
stations of Oxford, Cambridge, Marlborough and Gildiston was found to
be as follows (12):


TABLE I.

                   Winter  Summer
  From 1881-1885:   17%     83%
   ”   1906-1910:   38%     92%

It is observable that the amount of sunshine suffers an enormous
reduction in the winter time but only a very slight diminution in
the summer, and that during the last five years the conditions have
considerably improved, due, as we are told, to the considerable
abatement during the last decade or two of London smoke. During one
calendar year the hours of sunshine in the center of Leeds amounted
to 1164 while the corresponding figure for Adel, which is only 4
miles distant, was 1402 (4). Thus the loss of sunshine in Leeds due
to smoke amounted to 17%. The diminution of sunshine in towns near
smoke-producing cities is, again, shown in the following tabulation
of the comparative monthly average duration of bright sunshine for a
period of 20 years (24):


TABLE II.

    Station    Nov.   Dec.   Jan.   Feb.
  Runhill Row  22.8%   7.5%  14.1%  30.5%
  Westminster  27.7%  13.1%  18.4%  32.8%
  Kew          50.8%  38.1%  40.3%  54.6%
  Cambridge    61.0%  40.6%  48.9%  72.8%

At Kew, seven miles west of London, the reduction of sunshine due to
the London smoke has been placed at 37% for a whole year.

In the United States of America for the decennium, 1901-1910, the
aggregate hours of sunshine, percentage of possible sunshine, number
of cloudy days, number of partly cloudy days, and number of foggy days
have been found by the Pittsburgh smoke investigators, from a study of
the records gathered by the United States Weather Bureau in various
cities throughout the country, to be as shown in Table III.


TABLE III.

STATISTICS OF SUNSHINE IN 18 CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES

                     1.         2.        3.       4.       5.      6.
                 Aggregate  Percentage  No. of    No. of  No. of  Total
                 hrs. of   of possible  cloudy    partly   foggy   of 3
      Station.   sunshine.   sunshine.   days.    cloudy   days.  and 4.
                                                   days.

  Baltimore        26,466     58.7       1440     1018      142     2458
  Boston           25,877     56.8       1398     1003       98     2401
  Buffalo          23,200     49.7       1713     1324      157     3037
  Chicago          26,442     57.9       1238     1282      116     2520
  Cincinnati       26,758     58.6       1356     1202       81     2588
  Cleveland        22,394     47.8       1584     1187       67     2771
  Denver           29,355     65.9        645     1500       45     2145
  Detroit          23,201     50.3       1477     1165      133     2642
  Los Angeles      31,521     70.9        743     1404      258     2147
  Louisville       25,715     56.8       1284     1094      233     2378
  New Orleans      26,091     58.6       1045     1365      162     2410
  New York         28,762     57.6       1279     1182      120     2461
  Philadelphia     25,249     56.6       1369     1071      127     2440
  Pittsburgh       22,573     49.0       1385     1294      185     2679
  Portland, Me.    26,914     59.4       1321     1040      303     2361
  San Francisco    25,453     56.3        900     1136      241     2036
  St. Louis        24,957     58.7       1185     1019       42     2204
  Washington D. C. 25,078     55.8       1088     1135      115     2223

It is observable that all the cities which have become notorious in the
matter of smoke pollution show a very low percentage of sunshine, the
worst conditions obtaining in the two cities having the most unsavory
reputation for smoke, viz., Cleveland and Pittsburgh. These two cities
consistently have the worst records for sunshine, for percentage of
possible sunshine and for cloudy and partly cloudy days (combined
totals). Unfortunately no meteorological data are available from
stations situated in non-smoke-producing centers whose geographical
conditions are similar to those obtaining in smoke-producing cities
like Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Detroit, Cincinnati and St. Louis. The
above data only enable us to compare the atmospheric conditions of one
smoky city with another smoky city or with cities whose geographical
surroundings are so different as to render the data useless for
comparative purposes. However, the data recently collected by the
Smoke Investigation of the University of Pittsburgh show, in complete
accordance with similar English findings, that the lessened amount of
sunshine in Pittsburgh is due to the smoke factor. Figures based on
the number of tons of coal consumed in Pittsburgh from 1905 to 1911
show a fair degree of parallelism between the quantity of coal consumed
and the number of smoky days. During the years in which an increasing
amount of coal has been burned (owing to the heightened cost of gas)
the hours of sunshine have fallen from about 2800 to 2200. Likewise
the days on which the United States Weather Bureau has observed
light or dark smoke in Pittsburgh, have increased as follows for the
successive years from 1905-1911: 85, 87, 106, 124, 112, 100 and 156
days (O’Connor, 17). With the increase of coal consumption has come
an increase of smoky days. Dr. Benner tells me that the per cent. of
daylight (as chemically determined) in Pittsburgh was reduced for last
November about 32%, for December 23%, January 36% and February 44%
as compared with the town of Sewickley which is only about 12 miles
distant. There can then be no doubt that smoke lessens the amount of
sunshine.

Smoke likewise is directly related to the production of moisture, mist,
clouds, rain or fogs, because it supplies some of the solid particles
which may serve to aid in the formation of suspended drops of water.
Rain drops are often formed around a solid nucleus. Without solid
particles of dust in the atmosphere there would probably be much less
mist, rain and dew (4). We would, therefore, infer on merely _a priori_
grounds that smoke contributes to the production of fogs. That this
is so seems to be shown by actual investigation. An investigation
conducted by the Meteorological Council in 1901-1903 indicated that 20%
of the fogs in London were smoke-induced, (4, 21)--artificially induced
and therefore preventable fogs. Most suggestive, as showing that smoke
is partly responsible for the existence of fogs, are the fog and smoke
statistics gathered in London during the last 30 years, as shown in
Table IV (applicable to the winter months only). The number of days of
fog have been reduced nearly 300% and the hours of bright sunshine have
increased nearly 100% during this 30-year period (10).


TABLE IV.

    Date      Days of Fog   Hours of bright sunshine
  1883-1892      29.9%               55.6%
  1892-1901      20.7%               70.1%
  1901-1910      10.6%               93.5%

Likewise in Westminster the number of days of fog averaged 27 per year
for the lustrum 1902-1906, and 17 per year for the period 1907-1911.
The improvement shown above is due, in large part, to the increased use
of gas and electricity and to better stoking (Kershaw, Russell). On the
other hand, if we turn to Pittsburgh where the amount of smoke has been
on the increase in recent years, we find that the number of days of
fog increased from an average of 22.6 per year for the first five year
period to 50.2 for the second five year period, 1907-1911.

Not only is smoke related to the frequency of fogs, but it also
increases both the duration and the density of fogs. The water globules
become coated with a film of black, sticky, tarry soot which retards
evaporation. These soot fogs, or “pea-soup” fogs as they have often
been called because of their grimy opacity, may at times become
practically impervious to the luminous rays of the sun. Even in one
of the lighter varieties of fogs the soot products may increase seven
fold. Many average soot-fogs reduce the amount of light one-half. On
an exceptionally dark day in Berlin the light was only 1/500 of what
it was on an ordinary overcast day and only 1/3000 to 1/4000 of what
is was on an entirely clear day (H. H. Kimball). The smoke in the
center of Leeds on an ordinary day absorbs as much as 25% of the total
daylight as compared with the suburban sections of Leeds, or 40% as
compared with the suburb of Garforth, which is 7 miles distant (4).

That smoke must materially decrease the limits of visibility is patent
from what has been said. The limits of visibility vary with the number
of dust particles in the air: 1,000 particles per cu. cm. render
large objects like mountains invisible at a distance of 100 miles;
100,000 particles render them invisible 1 mile away, and 1,000,000
particles 1/10 of a mile distant (Aitken). Smoke not only fills the
atmosphere with countless numbers, but with extremely opaque particles.
These particles may unite with globules of water and this makes the
atmosphere still more opaque. As was stated above, in large cities even
in fine weather there may be over 300,000 particles per cu. cm., as
against a few hundred in the country. Accordingly, we find in London
that the limit of visibility in the winter time, even during the clear
part of the day, does not exceed one-half mile.

The temperature readings are somewhat unsatisfactory because they
usually include only the maximum and minimum records for each day.
Minimum temperatures are found to be perceptibly higher in the
cities than in the country, partly because of city heat, but chiefly
because the smoke blankets prevent the escape of the heat at night.
In Pittsburgh the minimum temperature averages about 4° higher than
the temperature in the adjacent stations (Kimball). In the day time
the upper surface of the smoke clouds absorbs portions of the sun’s
heat, and this inevitably lessens the heat on the ground surface. The
solar energy has been reduced 40% by smoke clouds (12), and it is
possible that very little heat penetrates to the earth’s surface during
a very dense smoke cloud. In London the surface temperature during a
given reading was 44° F., while 59 ft. directly above it was 51.5°, a
difference of 7.5°. Between 9 A. M. and 3 P. M. the surface temperature
rose 7.5°, while the roof reading rose 16.5°, or more than twice as
much. Although thoroughly satisfactory data are not available it is
undoubted that smoke (which is most abundant in the atmosphere in the
winter time, owing to lessened convection) lowers very perceptibly the
diurnal winter temperature in smoke-producing cities.

Finally, smoke indirectly affects the electrical potential of the
atmosphere. I know of no direct study of this question, but it is
possible that smoke causes a decrease in the potential because it tends
to increase humidity. An increase of humidity decreases the potential
(save possibly during fogs, as noted later, 14). We are also told that
the potential increases with the turbidity (Trubung) of the atmosphere,
and consequently with high barometric pressure. Since smoke tends to
decrease the diurnal temperature, particularly in the winter time, it
apparently tends to increase the diurnal potential, as the potential
decreases with increasing temperature (14).

Having thus discussed the atmospheric changes caused by smoke we now
turn to the second question. How do the various smoke-induced weather
states affect the mental and bodily health and happiness of human
beings? It is evident that the problem can be formulated largely in
terms of sunshine dynamics. On the one hand, we have the psychic and
physiological influences of positive states of sunshine: brightness,
luminosity, warmth, dryness, the presence of the infra-red, spectral
and ultra-violet rays, and high electrical potential (because of
dryness). On the other hand, we have the effects of the negative
states: gloom, darkness, cloudiness, fogginess, rain, moisture, cold
and low electrical potential. It is utterly impossible to separate all
of these components, and it will, therefore, be no easy task to measure
the influences of each component.

Literature, both poetry and prose, contains frequent allusions to the
alleged effects of sunshine or the absence of sunshine on the feelings
of man. Charles Lamb “felt himself immortal” and “a great deal taller”
on bright days. Moore took delight in sitting in the sunshine:

  “Blessed power of sunshine! genial day,
  What balm, what life are in thy way!
  To feel thee is such real bliss,
  That, had the world no joy but this,
  To sit in sunshine calm and sweet,
  It were a world too exquisite
  For man to leave it for the gloom,
  The deep cold shadow of the tomb.”

Byron felt “more religious on a sunshiny day,” Pope refers to “the
soul’s calm sunshine,” Rousseau sat with bared head in the sun; Shelley
so coveted the most intense sunlight that he did his writing from the
roof, while it is a common observation that people generally, and
particularly the aged, instinctively seek the sunshine. Mrs. Hemans
wrote a rapturous apostrophe to the sunbeam:

  “The sunbeam of summer
  O! what is like thee;
  Hope of the wilderness,
  Joy of the sea.”

Many writers cannot do satisfactory work unless the weather fits the
mood, motive or scene; unfavorable weather states cause a disagreement
in the thought processes(27).

Southey refers to the depressing influence made upon him by the “vile,
dark, rainy clouds” of Great Britain, when he returned from a sojourn
of 15 months in sunny Italy, where his brain was in a state of high
illumination. An Italian proverb runs thus: “Where comes no sun the
doctor comes.” Similarly a German saw: “The funeral coach turns twice
as often on the shady side of the street as on the sunny side.” J.
Ashby-Sterry has dwelt upon the demoralizing effect of the London fog:

  “A London fog when it arises
  All London soon demoralizes.”

  “It chokes our lungs,
  Our heads feel queer,
  We cannot see, we cannot hear!
  So when this murky pall drops down,
  Though dearly loving London town,
  We feel we cannot quite revere
      A London fog.”

Likewise Walter C. Smith:

  “A grey fog in the early prime,
    A blue fog by the breakfast hour,
  A saffron fog at luncheon time,
    At dinner a persistent shower
  Of smut, and then a dismal power
  Of choking darkness and despair,
  Thickening and saddening all the air.”

A special questionnaire investigation on nephelopsychosis made some
years ago by G. Stanley Hall and the writer (9) indicated that heavy
black clouds and fogs may often strike fear or terror into children,
or may make them feel depressed and gloomy or restless. Some children
experience “terrible fear” at times and others feel that “something
dreadful will happen when the horrible black ones appear.” There
are cases on record of actual motor paralysis caused by terrifying
clouds. There is here an interesting parallelism between the emotional
responses called out by clouds in the children of to-day and the
responses called out in primitive races. In his mythopoetic tendency
primitive man read fear and danger in dark clouds, particularly the
black thunder clouds. The smoke clouds of our city probably depress
children just as any dark clouds do, and when particularly black may
also arouse nephelophobias.

Sir Archibald Geikie has ascribed the subdued, grim character of the
Scot to the gloom of his valleys and the canopy of cloud “which for a
large part of the year cuts off the light and heat of the sun.” The
French formerly regarded the Englishmen as “rude, unlettered ... surly,
ill-conditioned men, having lived in an unhappy climate where perpetual
fog, only varied by rain, prevented the sun from ever being seen,
suffering from so deep and inveterate a melancholy that physicians had
called it the English spleen, and under the influence of this cruel
malady constantly committing suicide, particularly in November, when we
were well known to hang and shoot ourselves by the thousands” (2).

On the other hand, there are those who believe that the monotonous
gloom of England has inoculated the Britain against moods of depression
and hypochondria, and made for the evenness of temperament which is
said to characterize him (18). Gloomy weather would thus serve as a
catharsis against the very depressions which it is said to induce. I
must confess that this reasoning seems to me to be quite specious. The
effects of meteorological monotony, particularly of depressing states,
probably do not differ from the general effects of physiological or
psychic monotony: narcosis, hypnosis, fatigue, overstrain, distaste, or
aversion. However that may be, there can be no doubt that many persons
experience an exhilarating, tonic effect on a bright, sunshiny day and
a depressing influence on gloomy days--assertions that have, indeed,
been ridiculed by Dr. Johnson. Fortunately these impressionistic
views on the buoyancy of sunshine and on the depression of gloom
(particularly cold or hot, damp, dark days) find a certain degree of
support in scientific studies.

Deprived of sunshine the human skin assumes a pale greenish hue, like
the skin of the people in the polar regions. This is probably due
to the absence of the blue and ultra-violet rays of the sun which
dilate the blood vessels and bring the blood to the surface, and to
the absence of the infra-red rays which are associated with heat.
Sunshine promotes transpiration and perspiration, and thus favors the
elimination of toxic products through the skin. Bright, sunny days
lessen the strain on the kidneys.

The amount of blood and the per cent. of hemoglobin are increased
by sunlight and decreased by darkness. Oerum, in an experiment on
animals, found that light increased the quantity of blood 25% in 4
hours. Likewise Grawitz and Graffenberger have observed a diminution in
the quantity of blood in animals kept in the dark, while Marti found
under similar conditions that the number of red blood corpuscles was
lessened (13). There is thus a loss of red coloring matter in the blood
of animals kept in the dark. The well-known baker’s anemia points to
the same impoverished state of the blood in night workers (Gardenghi,
13). Not only so: in an examination of 29 persons Finsen (7) found
less hemoglobin in the winter than in the summer, presumably because
of the diminished sunshine in the winter time. Diesing suggests that
the lack of sunlight in northern countries is an essential factor in
the causation of rachitis. The rays of the sun--specifically the blue
and ultra-violet rays--thus exercise a tonic or stimulating action
on the organs of circulation, transpiration and elimination, and
very probably also directly stimulate the nervous system. Finsen has
shown that benumbed or apparently dead insects have been revitalized
by the application of ultra-violet rays. It is doubtful whether this
stimulating effect is due to increased electrical potential, as argued
by Dexter (5), because the more intense the sunshine and the higher the
temperature the lower is the potential (14). The stimulating effect is
probably due to the chemical action of the short rays of light. These
rays probably penetrate the deeper tissues of the body just like the
X-rays. It is well known that persons suffering from chronic joint
disease, particularly from joints affected with tubercular sinuses,
can be greatly benefited or entirely cured by constantly exposing the
affected limbs to the direct rays of the sun. Guggenbuhl, it will be
recalled, attained some success in the treatment of cretinism simply
by removing the cretins from the dark Alpine valley to the sunlit
summit of the Abendberg.

Because of the stimulating effect of sunshine, may not an excess of
sunshine be just as detrimental as a deficiency? It has, indeed, been
assumed that the climatic dangers of the tropics are largely due to
the injurious tropical sunlight, particularly to the abundance of the
ultra-violet rays. Woodruff holds that the failure of the white race
to colonize in the tropics is due to the excessive light, and not
to the heat and humidity. The light, he contends, tends to produce
ennui, neurasthenia and ultimate collapse in blond persons (26). This
conclusion is not sustained by recent investigations. Experiments have
shown that monkeys do not succumb from insolation in the tropical
sun if care is taken not to allow the bodily temperature to rise, by
conducting away by brisk air currents the excessive heat (Aron, 23).
The injurious quality of the solar light is thus due to the infra-red
and not the ultra-violet rays. The white man can secure adequate
protection in the shade from the heat rays, and by wearing white
clothing he can be adequately protected from the ultra-violet rays.

Whether the retinal excitation by the sun’s rays exerts any stimulating
influence is not known. It is known, however, that red colors are
stimulating. They excite some animals (for example, cattle, frogs
and turkeys) and increase muscular strength. Thus Fere obtained the
following strength records: with ordinary light, 23 units; with blue,
24; with green, 28; with yellow, 30; and with red, 42 (29). Colors,
as is well known, possess marked affective qualities, due not merely
to the affective tone of the sensation and the sense feeling, but to
the affective elements of consciousness, namely associations, emotions
and sentiments (29). That sunlight does exert psychic influences apart
from any specific retinal influence is a matter of common experience.
Nevertheless, the most important visual influence of sunshine is
perhaps not the emotional satisfaction, cheer or exuberance which
it engenders, but the optical value of good daylight. Daylight is
relatively colorless because it contains both chromatic and achromatic
light. A bright colorless illumination is best from the standpoint of
visual efficiency, health and affective quality. It is less fatiguing
than a colored light or than intense or dull artificial light. Electric
lights are often too intense because of the proximity of the light or
because the rays are thrown directly into the eyes or directly upon the
object under observation. They thus over-stimulate the sensitive layers
of the retina, and this may cause degenerative changes. Mercury vapor
lamps and old Welsbach burners emit a greenish flame whose affective
quality is very disagreeable to many persons. Many of the gas jets in
common use, unless equipped with incandescent burners, not only give a
weak flickering, dirty yellowish light, which is extremely fatiguing
and irritating to the eyes, but they also vitiate the air of the living
rooms, particularly in the homes of the poor in the winter time. Add to
these difficulties the further fact that by habit and association we
have learned to base our visual estimation and discrimination of things
on their appearance in broad daylight, and we begin to appreciate the
baneful optical effects of the frequent obscuration of the sun by smoke
clouds, by smoke-produced water clouds and fogs, and by the filling
of the atmosphere with opaque particles. As stated before, particles
in the air and fogs may reduce the limit of visibility from one mile
to less than one city block. During the dark days which are common in
manufacturing cities the lights must be kept burning in the homes,
schools, shops and factories--anywhere, in fact, where close eye work
must be done--all day. Almost always the lights must be turned on very
early in the evenings. Very frequently the intensity of artificial
illumination does not meet the requirements of visual health. Aside
from this, artificial illumination entails a considerable economic
loss. Worse still is the condition of those who, through financial
limitations, must work in the dark gloom of smoky days without the
aid of artificial light. The writer has shown in a special experiment
on the visual estimation of distances that bright objects are judged
to be nearer the observer than similar black objects when placed at
the same distance (25). This being the case, it is evident, as indeed
common observation indicates, that anything on which the eyes must be
fixated in darkened illumination will be imperfectly envisaged. To
overcome this optical handicap, there is a strong tendency to move the
object too near the eyes. If done repeatedly this entails a severe
strain on the muscles of accommodation, causing increased muscular
fatigue, which may result in muscular paralysis, imbalance or dioptric
distortions. On the other hand, by illuminating an object with good
daylight it will be made to appear nearer to the eye. The result is
that objects will actually be held at a further distance and distant
objects will be seen without eyestrain. If an investigation could be
carried out on a large scale with sufficient accuracy, it is possible
that a greater prevalence of myopia, myopic astigmatism and other eye
disorders would be found in densely smoky cities than in smoke-free
cities, so that a positive correlation would be found to exist between
eyestrain or certain eye disorders and atmospheric smoke.

Dark days repress the infra-red rays and thus diminish solar energy.
In fact, on excessively smoky days only a small amount of solar heat
penetrates to the earth’s surface. This circumstance may be rather
welcome to man during the excessive heat of the summer (although
objectionable to plant life), but during the winter time it may cause
much misery, particularly among the poor, because of the excessive
diurnal cold during this season (smoke clouds elevate the nocturnal
temperature). It is also possible that the reduction of the heat
profoundly affects the habits of the community. Thus Dexter (5) has
shown that low temperatures (10°) produce an excess of drunkenness
amounting to 38%, while high temperatures (85°) decrease drunkenness
to the extent of 40%. High winds, which lower the bodily temperature,
also increase dissipation. The increased tendency to dissipate
probably results from an attempt to seek forgetfulness from misery in
alcoholic narcosis, or from an attempt to artificially elevate the body
temperature by indulgence in drink.

Dark days exert a particularly sinister influence upon working people.
One factory head has ventured the opinion that a disagreeable day
yields about 10% less in labor returns than an agreeable day. During
human labor the chemical products of activity are greatly augmented.
The amount of carbon dioxide given off during a day of work is nearly
twice as much as during a day of rest. Observations on the embryos of
frogs also indicate that more carbonic acid is given off when it is
light than when it is dark (Moleschott). Therefore, merely reasoning
from these premises, it would appear that the bodily waste products
from muscular activity, and probably also to a lesser extent from
mental activity, are more injurious on dark than on bright days. Not
only so: dark, sunless days are likely to be moist, rainy or foggy.
During foggy days particularly the poisonous gases are unable to rise
because of the atmospheric stagnation that obtains during fogs. On
these days the amount of carbon dioxide may sometimes be increased
from 200 to 300% as compared with clear days. Dexter (5) attributes
the devitalizing, depleting effects of fogs to lowered electrical
potential. He regards atmospheric states of high electrical potential
as stimulating and vitalizing to animal life. But it has not been
conclusively shown that the electrical potential is decreased during
fogs. On the contrary, it is maintained that fogs, especially thick,
winter fogs, usually raise the potential (14), while the low ground
fogs in late summer and fall have been found to lower the potential.
But then, again, Chauvenau found that thick, city fogs exercised no
influence on the electrical potential. It has, therefore, not been
proved that lowered electrical potential has anything to do with the
depleting effects of fogs; but I am of opinion that the suppression of
the tonic chemical rays of the sunshine is an important factor.

Again, moisture in the atmosphere may become very injurious because it
absorbs the poisonous exhalations of living organisms. Hence the air
which must be breathed on moist, dark days is liable to be surcharged
with toxic waste products which poison the individual.

The effects of moisture _per se_ vary with the temperature. During
warm, moist atmospheric conditions there is diminished evaporation
from the lungs, fewer red corpuscles (because there is less oxygen
in the air), increased tendency towards intestinal troubles, lowered
resistance, and greater mental and bodily fatigue and prostration;
while during cool moist weather catarrhal, respiratory and rheumatic
affections are aggravated (3, 26).

It has been observed that changes in the density of moisture affect the
sensitivity for odors, tastes and touch. Tea-tasters do their best work
on fair days (11).

That the electrical potential decreases with increase of humidity
has, apparently, been established, except under conditions of fog.
It we grant that a state of high electrical potential stimulates and
energizes the organism, then a part of the devitalizing effect of humid
days must be ascribed to a lessened potential.

Not the least detrimental effect of the dark smoke strata of our
cities is the fact that they intercept the bactericidal rays of the
sun, namely, the blue and ultra-violet rays. These rays either check
the growth of, or completely exterminate, various kinds of pathogenic
bacteria (1, 6). Their deadly effect on the tubercle bacilli is
universally recognized. Indeed, as Sternberg points out, sunlight
is one of the most potent and one of the cheapest agents for the
destruction of pathogenic bacteria. Less diseases are found during
sunshiny than foggy or cloudy weather, while the death rate increases
considerably during fogs. Thus during a November fog in Glasgow the
death rate rose to 13.9 while in other Scotch towns free from fog it
was only 3.3. But the increase in the mortality is not merely due to
the fact that the sunless, foggy states lower the temperature and favor
the growth of micro-organisms, but the water globules absorb particles
of dust and acrid smoke and the toxic products of respiratory waste.
(In factories dust particles become vehicles for the products of human
fatigue.) The inhalation of these products irritates and poisons
the mucous membrane. Moisture is particularly injurious in cases of
pathological nasal obstruction. We should not forget, then, that fog
and particularly dense smoke fog may entirely extinguish those rays
of the sun which exert not only a germicidal action, but which also
possess a tonic, vitalizing quality, viz., the short wave lengths.

Now, since smoke diminishes the sunlight, reduces or suppresses the
heat giving infra-red and the tonic ultra-violet rays, and diminishes
the electrical potential (at least during certain states of the
atmosphere); since smoke increases humidity, both during cold and
warm weather, but particularly during cold states; and since it also
increases fogs, and since fogs and humidity tend to increase the
poisonous, bactericidal and solid contents of the air and to decrease
the electrical potential and the heat light rays; it is evident that
smoke must exert an important influence on human health, happiness and
efficiency, and that the smoke nuisance must be regarded as a problem
of very vital concern to any community that would conserve the vital
efficiency of its citizenship.

The assumption that smoke is an immediate, indirect conditioning
factor in human behavior, because of its sinister influence on weather
states (aside from its intrinsically pernicious qualities), is at
least suggested by the only comprehensive study extant of the relation
of weather to abnormal behavior: viz., Dexter’s investigation of the
influences of various weather states on the conduct of a large number
of child and adult offenders in Denver and New York City (5). The
data which he studied included records of misdemeanors in schools,
penitentiaries, and hospitals for the insane, arrests for assault and
battery, for suicide and murder, records of deaths and bank errors,
and strength tests. From this study Dexter arrives at the conclusion
that days with high temperature and high humidity are unfavorable
to metabolism. More specifically: anabolism is favored by high
temperatures (though high temperatures deplete the vital reserve),
high winds (because of better ventilation), and fair days with low
humidity; while katabolism is increased by low temperatures, high
humidities, high barometric pressures, rainy and cloudy days, and
calms. (During fogs there is usually a condition of calm and a fall of
temperature.) The katabolic weather states tend to deplete vitality,
lower the vital reserve and augment the death rate, while the anabolic
states tend to stimulate, invigorate, irritate and increase the nervous
tension. Conformably with this classification of weather states Dexter
finds statistically that anabolic conditions increase all the data
which are of the nature of offenses.

Thus--to limit the discussion to the weather states which are
influenced by smoke--school misdemeanors were increased on fair and dry
days, on days with high winds (an increase of 200% in Denver), and days
with low humidities (increase of 200% in Denver between 10° and 30°;
and 33% in New York City between 50° and 55°). Assaults were likewise
increased on clear days. The records of suicide and attempted suicide
during a period of 5 years in New York City indicated that suicides
were 31% more frequent on dry than on wet days; 21% more frequent on
clear than cloudy days (another investigation gave an increase of
1700% on clear and dry days, while an article in the Popular Science
Monthly states that the excesses were on days of high humidity),
and less frequent on rainy days. The traditional view is that most
suicides occur on cloudy and not on clear days. Villemair claimed that
nine-tenths of all suicides took place on rainy and cloudy days, while
Dickens, Lytton and Pope stage their tragic climaxes on cloudy days.
Statistical evidence does not support these popular notions.

Likewise clear, and particularly excessively dry days, increased
the number of arrests for inebriety, although in the article in the
International Journal of Ethics it is said that humidity increases
drunkenness.

On the other hand, school misdemeanors were reduced on humid, rainy,
snowy and possibly on cloudy days and days with high temperature; while
adult assaults, murders and disciplinary cases in penitentiaries and
institutions for the insane were also reduced on excessively humid
days. On foggy days more bank errors were made in New York City, a
finding in harmony with the practice adopted by the Bank of England of
requiring clerks to work at less intricate and less important problems
on foggy and depressing days.

Waiving certain discrepancies which appear in a comparative examination
of Dexter’s various articles it appears that school misdemeanors,
assaults, suicides and drunkenness are increased on clear and dry days.
The increase in the assaults and drunkenness may be due to the fact
that people go out more on clear than on wet days, hence have more
opportunities for getting into brawls--though one might argue that
on dark, foggy days they would be driven into the saloons, thereby
increasing the offenses. On dry days perspiration is increased and
therefore there is more demand for liquid refreshment. But, what
is more important, there is also very probably some stimulating or
irritating quality in clear, dry, sunshiny weather. Dexter assumes
this, though he does not ascribe the stimulating quality to the
dryness but to the increased electrical potential of dry air. Pupils
are stimulated on clear, dry, sunny days, hence they are more active,
aggressive and enterprising, but likewise more restless, high
strung, emotionally unstable and therefore also more mischievous. A
superabundance of energy and not a state of enervation predisposes to
childish pranks and nervous explosions. An increase of vitality and
nervous tension upsets the unstable equilibrium of the predisposed
offender, gives him a false sense of strength, and an exaggerated idea
of self-importance (often paranoia-like in its intensity), and hence
he becomes more aggressively criminalistic. Moreover, the exhilarating
qualities of tonic days give the potential suicide just the courage
he needs to take his own life, the courage which he may be unable to
muster during states of depleted vitality. Devitalized states of the
body breed fear, diffidence and cowardice.

On the other hand, the humid and hot days are devitalizing (because of
low electrical potential, according to Dexter) and therefore lead to
inaction. Depleted vitality and nervous exhaustion are inhibitory of
action, hence during devitalizing weather states misdemeanors decrease
in number.

There is no doubt that opposed weather states exercise stimulating and
irritating influences, on the one hand, and enervating and inhibitory
influences, on the other hand; but it is not clear that this is due
to a difference of electrical potential. It remains to be shown that
heightened electrical potential acts as a nervous tonic and irritant.
The theory assumes that heightened winds and sunshine increase the
potential; but meteorologists tell us that the potential is independent
of both the direction and the velocity of wind; and that the more
intense the sunshine the higher the temperature, and the purer the
air, the lower is the potential (14). It is apparent that these
conclusions go counter to the theory demanded by Dexter’s empirical
findings (except in the case of humidity uncomplicated by fogginess),
and that a more satisfactory basis of explanation is to be sought in
the bio-dynamic properties of the sun’s rays, especially of the blue
and ultra-violet rays. These rays dilate the blood vessels, increase
the hemoglobin, increase anabolism, transpiration, irritate the skin,
stimulate and vitalize nervous, muscular and mental action, and augment
the potential reserve, working force and functional efficiency of the
individual. If this is true it is clear that bright, sunny states
while they increase misdemeanors and crimes in unstable individuals,
also--and this is more important--energize the human organism.

On this theory the damp, dark, smoky, foggy days are depleting and
depressing just because (at least so far forth) they are lacking in
the tonic, health-giving rays of the sun. The investigations cited
above indicate that these weather conditions actually are in the main
devitalizing, depressing and inhibitive of action, and that they,
therefore, decrease breaches against law and order. These conclusions
do indeed seem to be justified by the rather incomplete statistics of
violence which are available from the various cities of the country.
Thus, Table V, statistics of homicide, show that there is no increase
in the frequency of murders in the cities whose atmosphere is supposed
to be surcharged with smoke and where, accordingly, depleting weather
conditions obtain.


TABLE V.

HOMICIDE STATISTICS FOR 31 AMERICAN CITIES.

                                     1901-1910.        1911.
                                   No.   Rate per   No.  Rate per
                                         100,000         100,000

  Memphis, Tenn.                    556   47.1       85    63.4
  Charleston, N. C.                 159   27.7       25    42.3
  Savannah, Ga.                     154   25.6       25    37.8
  New Orleans, La.                  702   22.2       83    24.1
  Atlanta, Ga.                      215   17.1       48    29.8
  Louisville, Ky.                   356   16.5       36    15.9
  Nashville, Tenn.                  132   13.6       40    35.3
  St. Louis, Mo.                    804   12.6      108    15.5
  San Francisco, Cal.               343   11.42      44    10.4
  Cincinnati, Ohio                  328    9.4
  Chicago, Ill.                    1659    8.4      203     9.1
  Spokane, Wash.                     55    8.0        3     2.7
  Seattle, Wash.                    119    7.6       20     7.9
  Washington, D. C.                 210    6.8       31     9.2
  Manhattan and The Bronx, N. Y.   1249    5.1      197     6.9
  Cleveland, Ohio                   234    4.9       50     8.6
  Pittsburgh, Pa.                   243    4.9       50     5.3
  Providence, R.I.                   97    4.8
  Boston, Mass.                     283    4.6       33     4.8
  Dayton, Ohio                       44    4.3        8     6.7
  Brooklyn, N. Y.                   583    4.2       61     3.6
  Baltimore, Md.                    215    4.0       27     4.8
  Reading, Pa.                       32    4.0        7     7.2
  Philadelphia, Pa.                 529    3.7       66     4.2
  Memphis, Tenn.                    556   47.1       85    63.4
  Hartford, Conn.                    24    3.3        4     4.0
  Buffalo, N. Y.                    109    2.8       25     5.8
  Minneapolis, Minn.                 71    2.7       11     3.6
  Newark, N. J.                      68    2.3        6     1.7
  Rochester, N. Y.                   43    2.3       14     6.2
  Milwaukee, Wis.                    56    1.7       11     2.8

As a matter of fact, Shipley has argued that the ratio of murders
in various cities of the United States is directly related to the
prevalence of various alien races, the Mexicans being the chief
homicidal offenders (121 murders per 100,000 of the population),
followed by the Chinese (65) and the Italians (50.2) (20).

The statistics for suicide in Table VI are mostly for cities with low
smoke density. It is observable, however, that the suicide rates are
low in the two worst smoke-offending cities tabulated, viz., St. Louis
and Pueblo.


TABLE VI.

SUICIDE RATES PER 100,000 IN AMERICAN CITIES FROM 1900-1909.

(L. L. Hoffman.)

  San Francisco      52.0
  San Diego          38.5
  Hoboken            35.4
  Sacramento         35.3
  Los Angeles        30.2
  Oakland, Cal.      29.7
  St. Louis          29.7
  Seattle            27.8
  Springfield, Ill.  27.8
  Pueblo             27.7

These statistics are in complete agreement with European suicide
statistics. The traditional view had it there was an abnormally large
percentage of suicides in England and that this was largely due to a
cosmic factor--the murky, smoky gloom of Great Britain. Investigation
shows, however, that the percentage of suicide in England is less than
in any other European country. (See 15, and references in 2.)

For assault and battery, and drunkenness I have been unable to obtain
statistics. I believe, however, that we are justified in concluding,
from the rather meager facts in our possession, that the devitalizing
weather conditions produced by manufacturing cities do not increase
misdemeanors and crime. On the contrary, they seem to inhibit rather
than incite offenses against the law. From the standpoint of the police
courts depleting days seem to be a desirable asset, while bright,
tonic, irritating days are an undesirable asset. Granting the truth of
this contention, let us not forget the complementary and more important
facts presented in the preceding pages; namely, that gloomy, humid,
foggy days (such days as are produced by smoke-begrimed skies) lessen
vital potential, reduce or retard activity and impair efficiency, while
bright, dry, sunshiny days increase the potential reserve, liberate
energy, augment working capacity and stimulate ambition. To be sure, an
unbroken series of smoky days might prove too stimulating, or at least
too monotonous, but the elimination of city smoke will at the most only
eliminate the frequent and oppressive smoke-induced weather clouds.
Nature will still furnish an ample supply of misty, cloudy and rainy
days.


_NOTE ON THE INFLUENCE OF CLOUDY AND CLEAR DAYS ON THE INSANE._

Books on psychiatry and several psychopathologists whom I have
consulted have very little scientifically established information to
offer on the reactions of the insane to divers weather states. The
following reply from Dr. Max E. Witte who, as Superintendent of large
hospitals, has been in intimate contact with the insane for over a
third of a century, is suggestive: “I regret that I am unable to give
you anything definitely set down in black and white, and in figures,
but there is no question whatsoever, and it is a matter of remark,
even to the least observant of our nurses, that the insane are very
sensitive to weather conditions, and are particularly disturbed and
influenced in an unfavorable way by clouded, overcast weather. Those
who are of an excitable, maniacal tendency are more noisy, boisterous,
and restless; those who are depressed are more gloomy, and inclined
to forebodings, and generally more miserable in feeling than they are
during dry and clear weather.

A period of several consecutive days of clouded, overcast weather is
promptly followed by reports of restlessness, greater depression, and a
general disposition to be disorderly, and even violent, on the part of
those who are disposed that way.

On the other hand, dry, sunshiny weather coming on after such a period,
is soon followed by quieter, gentler and generally more comfortable
moods.

The insane, unless materially demented, react more fully to outside
influences, due in part, in some forms, to greater emotional mobility,
and more particularly to a lack of restraint by the will; and also, in
part, to the fact that they have their attention less occupied with the
matters and affairs of every day life, than do the sane. Still, I take
it, that the sane, judging by myself, are subconsciously influenced by
weather conditions. I notice in myself, on observation and analysis,
that the shades that haunt me during gloomy weather, fade with the
coming of the sun.

I have no doubt that the climatic conditions that permanently manifest
themselves, the clearness or cloudiness of the sky, have impressed
the peoples, say for instance of Europe, in the course of ages, with
certain national racial characteristics; and I have no doubt that the
murky, smoky atmosphere of your city exerts an influence to a greater
or lesser degree upon the morals and disposition of the young people
who dwell habitually in your climate.

I do not recall ever having seen any study, or more extensive
investigation of this interesting topic.”


FOOTNOTES:

[1] Figures placed within parenthesis refer to the corresponding
references in the bibliography at the close of the paper.

[2] The writer has confirmed this statement in inquiries made among a
number of recent professional arrivals in Pittsburgh, who say they are
more fatigued by their work here than in other cities where they have
labored.




II. The Aesthetic Aspects of Smoke Pollution


“The smoke nuisance is the greatest hindrance to the highest
development of civic beauty and refinement” (Holdsworth, 33).
Historically the first anti-smoke propagandas were waged against
the nuisance on aesthetic grounds. In London the use of “Sea cole”
was legally prohibited during a portion of the middle ages because
the smoke palls marred the beauty of buildings, which were at that
time painted in whitewash, with colored decorations in front (34).
Violations of the smoke statute were considered so serious that a
citizen of London was executed in 1306 for burning “Sea cole” (22).
With the lapse of the anti-smoke ordinance in the middle of the
sixteenth century the use of lime white and colored effects on the
exterior of buildings was abandoned, and in their place appeared an
unsightly, discolored, mottled, greasy coat of tarry soot on the
outside of buildings.

A smoke-contaminated atmosphere imposes very severe restrictions on the
efforts of the architect, sculptor, painter, decorator and landscape
gardener to beautify our cities. This limitation applies to the
character of the paints and colors, the nature of the materials, the
style of architecture, interior decoration, and the possibilities of
artistic horticultural effects.

Exterior painting in the form of mosaic or polychromic ornamentation
cannot be successfully employed to any extent in smoky cities (32).
Colored effects on stones, metals, ordinary or glazed bricks or
faience will not for long retain their purity in a murky atmosphere. A
grimy, blotchy, streaky, inartistic, abject appearance of the exterior
chromatic decoration of buildings in smoky cities is a matter of common
observation. Even glazed white bricks when used inside the building may
become dirty and discolored. Observation shows that placards in red
lead become gradually decolored in cities, even when protected against
the sun and rain, but not in the country air (35). The pernicious
influence of the smoke on color effects is probably due to the fact
that the colors become mechanically covered over by a coat of tarry
soot and dirt. This tarry mass may effectually obliterate all color
effects. It tends to adhere so firmly that it can only be removed, if
at all, with great difficulty and with the aid of special solvents,
and in the process of removal the colored paints often tend to scale
off with the dirt. The defiling effect of the actual dirt is the most
objectionable influence of smoke on stained glass. But smoke may also
cause the disintegration of paint films, owing to the corrosive agents
which smoke often contains. It is thus evident that smoke largely
restricts exterior coloration to a play of light and shade. In fact, it
tends to restrict paint effects to the darker shades.

Smoke also causes decay of interior paintings and tends to restrict the
furniture and furnishings to the more somber hues. In smoky atmospheres
the interiors of buildings are usually more or less dark, hence special
efforts must be made to keep the paintings free from dust and soot
films. But constant mechanical or chemical cleaning or washing lessen
the brilliancy of the color effects. A smooth, varnish-like or glazed
coating on mural decorations is favorable for purposes of cleaning, but
inimical to the best artistic effects. The matt enables the colored
designs to show off to the best advantage, but matt is absorbent and
attracts smoke and dirt products and resists successful cleaning.
In the case of paint on plaster the corrosive products in smoke
(particularly sulphuric acid) penetrate through the paint so that it
tends to scale off; while in the case of fresco the porous surface of
the carbonate of lime provides opportunity for the tenacious lodgment
of dirt and for the destructive action of the acids. The carbonate is
transformed into gypsum. It is so expanded that it loses its binding
power, while the painting-ground is also often destroyed (30). It
should be remarked incidentally that housewives in smoky cities are
much inclined to keep doors and windows shut in order to exclude soot
and dirt. While this may be aesthetically commendable, it is none the
less hygienically objectionable. Moreover, the great amount of extra
labor required to keep houses clean in smoky cities consumes the vital
reserve of many women and robs them of the leisure moments which are
theirs by right and which are essential for bodily rest and mental
recreation and improvement.

Not only is smoke inimical to the highest aesthetic utilization of
artificial coloration--particularly exterior coloration--but it
obliterates the most richly colored panorama of nature, namely, the
iridescent clouds of the sky. The situation in cities is bad enough
without the smoke, for in large cities the tall buildings prevent many
people from ever getting a glimpse of the beautiful cloudscapes of the
sunset or the splendor of the sunrise. But when you add the smoke palls
to the buildings you often effectually close all visual approach to the
richly illumined and picturesquely silhouetted clouds of the day and
the resplendent stars of the night. That this frequent obscuration of
the sky limits the aesthetic resources of any community has been shown
by the writer in the article to which reference has already been made
(9).

Clouds are capable of calling out the strongest emotions of the
soul--fear, depression, gloom, awe, reverence, joy, cheer and hope.
Children take great delight in watching cloudscapes and in discovering
objects in the constantly changing forms. Over one hundred different
kinds of objects were recorded in the replies which were tabulated
in this investigation. Richly illumined, iridescent and constantly
changing cloudscapes afford a most fertile field for the exercise of
imaginative creativeness. The masters who have charmed the race by
their imaginative descriptions often have derived their most exquisite
conceptions from the flying cloudscapes rather than from beautiful
flowers, mountains, parks or buildings. No work of art can elevate
the feelings to such lofty adoration of the marvels of nature as the
colored glories of the sunset and sunrise (Biglow). The scenes of the
Scandinavian gods and goddesses were staged in cloudland. The clouds
have impressed themselves upon the cosmogony, mythology, religion,
morals, beliefs and superstitions of primitive races as well as of
modern children. The modern child’s emotional reactions are vestiges
of ancestral attitudes towards clouds, while the modern painter and
poet still find inspiration in cloudland. City smoke not only cheats
us of our birthright, by depriving us of an important means for
developing the powers of observation and imagination as well as of a
source of aesthetic culture (because it covers the heavens with an
opaque blanket); but it also displaces the cathedrals of nature with
an uninteresting, nasty, black, opaque pall of soot which stimulates
tendencies toward discontent and frequently arouses morbid emotions.
Mankind has always taken a delight in color. Under primitive conditions
man bedecks his body with colored habiliments for purely decorative
rather than protective purposes. Deprived of the enjoyment of the
natural terrestrial color effects by high buildings, man resorts to
the artificial coloration of his buildings. But the smoke palls tend
to subvert his every effort to satisfy the demands of his color sense.
The abatement of smoke will do much to restore hue and chroma to their
rightful places in the aesthetic development of manufacturing cities.

Smoke defaces, disfigures or destroys buildings and restricts the
styles of architecture. The sulphuric acid particularly corrodes or
disintegrates practically all kinds of building materials (slate and
granite possibly excepted). Marble tends first to turn green and then
black; limestone deteriorates very rapidly, turning to gypsum owing
to its great affinity for sulphur. The absorption of sulphur causes
the stone to expand, thus rendering it soluble and powdery so that
particles are constantly washed or blown away. The very best stone
obtainable was used in the new additions to the House of Parliament
in London, and every care suggested by modern science was taken to
preserve the materials, yet the buildings were much eroded after a
few years. One of the worst aspects of the smoke nuisance is the
insidiously destructive influence of smoke on ancient buildings,
relics or monuments.

Smoke thus not only shortens the life of building materials, but it
destroys the force of expression of the architecture so that buildings
are reduced to a shabby mass of begrimed masonry. The sharp outstanding
moldings, designs, friezes, cornices, ornaments and carvings--the
essentially artistic in architectural construction--are not only
rapidly eroded but they are obliterated by the dense deposit of tarry
soot, or rendered invisible because of the diminished illumination
caused by the murky palls of smoke that hang over our cities. In the
city of London 650 tons of soot have been deposited per square mile
of ground surface, and soot deposits 3/4 inch thick have been scraped
from cornice projections. The beauty of the architectural views
consists in the distinctness of the outlines. Soot deposits conceal
the artistic effects not only on stone and brick but also on wood. The
difficulty cannot be entirely overcome by cleaning, because cleaning
tends to remove the sharp edges and outlines. Moreover, preservatives
for water proofing often leave an unpleasant color and frequently
are not effective unless 18 or 20 coats are applied (for example of
baryta-water).

The ornamentation of city buildings is thus seriously restricted,
while the preservation of historical landmarks is jeopardized by smoke
pollution. Smoke and architectural embellishment are irreconcilable
enemies.

The influence of smoke on metal work is equally pernicious. The
sulphuretted hydrogen in smoke blackens, disfigures or tarnishes nearly
all metals. Copper and bronze rapidly darken, iron rapidly corrodes,
aluminum is affected by vapors and acids, many metals become pitted
from electro-chemical action, and even gold or gilded articles become
dull. Gilt titles on books will fade in the city while retaining their
luster in the country. Bright and uneven metallic surfaces may also
become coated with a mottled, sooty smear. To keep sign plates on any
metal work bright and shiny requires constant work in smoky cities. The
protective coatings used are not entirely satisfactory because they
tend to crack or to peel off, or to leave pin holes. Constant cleaning
entails large expense both because of the labor required and because
of the wear on the metal. Rather than assume this added burden of
expense merchants in smoky cities tend to minimize the use of brilliant
metallic ornaments. In consequence such cities often lack that polished
metallic splendor which is one of the charms of the tourist cities of
the earth.

Outdoor statuary in metal or stone in smoky cities suffers from all
the disadvantages affecting buildings and metal work. The bituminous
deposits cannot be removed by washing, and statues can only be
protected by layers of water proofing. But even then ugly layers of
grime will cover the exterior and render unsightly some of our best
treasures of municipal art.

The possibilities of landscape or decorative gardening are also
artificially restricted in a smoky atmosphere. Cloudiness as such is
one of the most important items in agricultural climatology. But in
addition to this there are many shrubs and trees which do not thrive
in smoke--rhododendrons, conifers, evergreens--while the beauty of all
trees, shrubs and flowers is marred by deposits of smoky opacity.

In consequence of the above artistic limitations, the artistic
education available not only for the masses but particularly for
students of art in smoky cities, is necessarily restricted. Their
first, and sometimes only, artistic impressions are derived from an
artistically limited and ultra-utilitarian environment, and from
besmirched and sordid surroundings instead of from a clear, clean
atmosphere of artistic excellence.

Not only do grimy, physical surroundings debase the aesthetic ideals
of the dweller in smoke, but they also probably tend to foster
personal habits of carelessness. The children playing in the streets
in grimy cities become so accustomed to soot and smut that they
learn to revel in grime and to glory in grease. To say that we have
become a “well washed” race (as say Sir Thomas Oliver and Dr. Woods
Hutchinson) because we are being constantly defiled by atmospheric
smut is tantamount to saying that we have become moral, healthy and
vigorous because of contamination by the social plague or infection by
virulent bacteria. It is not so. Even if we do resort to more frequent
external cleansing this does not render us any cleaner, because we
may forthwith become begrimed by the omnipresent smut of the air.
Moreover, our lungs and alimentary canal can not so readily be “washed
out,” so that smoke at least keeps us interiorally begrimed. So far as
the young child is concerned, the labor of cleaning is usually thrown
upon the mother. Mothers evidently grow weary of washing the faces
and hands and changing the clothes of their youthful progeny several
times a day. Hence the child is left to wallow in dirt. Adults may
tend to continue the habits which they formed as children. They, too,
at any rate, grow weary of constant ablutions and changes of garments,
and will tend to adopt the more somber shades of apparel which are
less readily soiled by soot. The lighter raiment which often is more
pleasing to the eye, and in the summer time is more conducive to
comfort, must often be tabooed in smoky cities. The wearing apparel
in such cities in consequence will offer less variety than in cities
of low-smoke content. Women in white fabrics must not venture to sit
down on an unprotected park seat in smoky cities less they carry away a
conspicuous ribbon of grime across their backs.

       *       *       *       *       *

It is possible that habits of carelessness, indifference, or ready
satisfaction which the dwellers in smoky cities may tend to acquire,
in respect to personal cleanliness and dress and in respect to the
artistic and cleanly appearance of the external city surroundings, may
transfer to other aspects of their psychic existence, because, while
the doctrine of formal discipline has been exploded in its crass form,
psychological experiments show that habits which have been acquired in
one phase of mental action will transfer more or less to other phases
of mental action which have similar or identical elements (36).

Finally it should be emphasized that cities befouled with murky smoke
are at a decided disadvantage as tourist or residential places. Wealthy
tourists and globe trotters go to the brilliant, resplendent, ornate,
clean cities--the show places--and not to the nasty, pungent smoke
producers. Even if the tourist perchance does come to a dirty town
he will rarely tarry there for any length of time. Few towns which
tolerate the smoke nuisance can hope to compete for tourist trade. The
loss in tourist trade caused by preventable smoke in manufacturing
cities represents an enormous economic loss to the trades and
professions of those cities. Not only so, people looking for a city
residence will not seek centers reeking with smoke. Retired people of
wealth will prefer the smoke-free cities of culture and art where they
can inhale the uncontaminated, invigorating ozone of sun-kissed skies.




Summary of Conclusions


I. The injurious organic effects exerted by smoke on human beings are
both direct and indirect. The direct effects are due to the injury
caused by the smoke contents themselves, while the indirect effects
arise from meteorological changes produced by atmospheric smoke.

II. The mental effects of smoke and smoke-produced weather states are
likewise both direct and indirect. The indirect effects issue from
bodily changes produced by smoke or smoke-produced weather states,
while the direct effects are due to the influences of the mind’s own
states upon its subsequent thoughts, disposition and conduct.

III. Smoke fills the atmosphere with acrid, poisonous compounds and
soot particles which may serve as carriers of the obnoxious products
of human fatigue, which irritate the sensitive membranes of the
eyes, nose, throat, lungs and gastro-intestinal tract, increase the
susceptibility of gastro-intestinal, pulmonary and naso-pharyngeal
disorders, diminish the potential reserve, working capacity and well
being of the individual, increase fatigue, irritability and malcontent,
and may tend to hasten premature decay.

IV. Smoke lessens the duration and intensity of sunshine, reduces the
intensity of daylight, the limit of visibility and the diurnal winter
temperature; increases humidity, mists, the frequency and duration of
fogs and possibly alters the electrical potential.

V. Sunshine is an important bio-dynamic agent. It promotes anabolism,
transpiration and perspiration, and increases the percentage of
hemoglobin. The blue and ultra-violet rays of sunshine exert a
bactericidal effect on pathogenic bacteria, and a tonic, vitalizing
influence upon the human organism. Sunshine exerts an exuberant
influence on the feelings. Moreover, colorless daylight is superior for
visual efficiency, optical health and affective quality.

VI. Dark clouds have a depressing, devitalizing effect. They may cause
fear in children, reduce working efficiency, and labor returns; give
rise to eye strain and dioptric disorders; give rise to disquietude,
restlessness and forebodings in the insane; and may increase
drunkenness because of the reduction of the diurnal temperature in the
winter time.

VII. Humidity increases the solid, poisonous, bactericidal contents
of the air, aggravates various pathological conditions of the body,
reduces the sensitivity of some sense organs and depletes the vital
potential. Fogs, in addition, increase the inaccuracy of mental work
(bank errors), increase the prevalence of diseases, and augment the
death rate.

VIII. Clear, dry days are anabolic in character and thus produce a
superabundance of energy. While this may lead, as statistics seem
to show, to an increase of school misdemeanors, assaults, suicides
and arrests for drunkenness in emotionally and nervously unstable
individuals, it also tends to energize the human organism, augment its
functional efficiency and enhance its achievement capacity. Negatively
the data seem to indicate that smoky weather states (just because they
deplete energy and thereby inhibit action) lessen rather than increase
crimes of violence.

IX. Smoke clouds are inimical to the highest aesthetic development of
urban communities. They seriously limit not only the possibilities
of municipal art, in respect to architecture, statuary, painting,
and ornamental gardening, but also limit the possibilities of art
education in the community in question. They begrime, deface, decolor,
destroy and corrode interior and exterior artistic effects in color,
brick, stone, marble or metal. They befoul the persons as well as the
dress of the inhabitants, limit the range of wearing apparel, and may
foster habits of indifference. They obliterate the natural terrestrial
panorama of art, the iridescent clouds of the sky. Because of the
murky, abject inartistic appearance of these cities, they are avoided
by the wealthy tourist and the retired person of wealth who is in
search of a desirable place for residence.

X. Our knowledge of the mental influences of atmospheric smoke
pollution should be rendered more complete by systematic psychological
research. Two methods are available for this investigation, namely,
the questionnaire method and the experimental method. By means of
the questionnaire a mass of interesting and valuable experiential,
observational and impressionistic data can be collected from children
and adults bearing on smoke psychology. By the experimental method
it is possible to measure in quantitative terms under controlled
conditions of smoke density, the influence of smoke upon the functional
efficiency of various sensory, motor and intellectual processes. To
prosecute such a research one requires controlled subjects, controlled
apparatus and controlled smoke rooms.

My thanks for courtesies extended to me in connection with this
research are due to Dr. R. C. Benner, Mr. J. J. O’Connor, Jr., Dr. W.
W. Strong and Mr. E. H. McClelland.




Bibliography of References Cited in the Text


On the pathology of smoke

1. =Arloing=, Saturnin.

 Influence de la lumière sur la végétation et les propriétés pathogènes
 du bacillus. 1885. (In Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de
 L’Académie des sciences, v. 100, p. 378-381.)

2. =Buckle=, Henry Thomas.

 History of civilization in England. 280 w. v. 1, p. 158. 1894.

3. =Climate= in the treatment of disease. 2220 w. 1910. (In
Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed., v. 6, p. 526.)

4. =Cohen=, Julius Berend, & =Ruston=, Arthur G.

 Smoke; a study of town air. London. 88 p. Ill. 1912. _The same,
 review._ 1912. (In Rauch und staub, v. 2, p. 238.)

5. =Dexter=, Edwin Grant.

 Conduct and the weather; an inductive study of the mental effects
 of definite meteorological conditions. 103 p. 14 diag. 1899. (In
 Psychological review, Series of monograph supplements, v. 2, no. 6,
 May, 1899.)

 The child and the weather. 4 diag. 1898. (In Pedagogical seminary, v.
 5, p. 512-522.)

 Influence of the weather upon crime. 6 diag. 1899. (In Popular science
 monthly, v. 55, p. 653-660.)

 School deportment and the weather. 1900. (In Educational review, v.
 19, p. 160-168.)

 Drunkenness and the weather. 7 diag. 1900. (In Annals of the American
 Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 16, p. 421-434.)

 Suicide and the weather. 6 diag. 1901. (In Popular science monthly, v.
 58, p. 604-615.)

 Ethics and the weather. 1901. (In International journal of ethics, v.
 11, p. 481-492.)

 The mental effects of the weather. 4 diag. 1899. (In Science, n. s.,
 v. 10, p. 176-180.)

6. =Duclaux=, Pierre Emile. 1887. (In Revue scientifique.)

 See reference in Lorand, Arnold. Old age deferred. 1912. p. 256.

7. =Finsen=, Niels R.

 Uber die anwendung von concentrirten chemischen lichtstrahlen in der
 medicin. Leipzig. 1899. 52 p.

 Meddelelser fra Finsens medicinske lysinstitut. Kjöbenhavn. 165 p.
 1899.

 1894, Kjöbenhavn. (In Hospitalstidende, p. 1209-1239.)

8. =Gillespie=, C. G. K.

 Physical effects of air pollution. 12 dr. 1887. (In Manchester
 and Salford Noxious Vapors Abatement Association. Lectures on air
 pollution, no. 5, p. 55-70.)

9. =Hall=, G. Stanley, & =Wallin=, J. E. Wallace.

 How children and youth think and feel about clouds. 1902. (In
 Pedagogical seminary, v. 9, p. 460-506.)

10. =Kershaw=, John B. C.

 Notes on recent progress in the campaign against black smoke in
 the United Kingdom. 1912. (In Papers read at the Smoke Abatement
 Conferences, March ... 1912, p. 68-75.)

11. =Lemon=, J. S.

 Psychic effects of the weather. 1894. (In American journal of
 psychology, v. 6, p. 277-279.)

12. =Lempfert=, R. G. K.

 Sunshine records; a comparison of sunshine statistics for urban
 and rural stations. 1912. (In Papers read at the Smoke Abatement
 Conferences, March ... 1912, p. 23-28.)

13. =Lorand=, Arnold.

 Old age deferred. Philadelphia. 1912. p. 255-261.

14. =Mache=, H. & =Schweidler=, E. V.

 Die ätmospharische elektrizität. 1909. p. 36-39.

15. =Morselli=, Henry.

 Cosmico-natural influences which act on suicide. 1882. (In “Suicide,
 an essay on comparative moral statistics,” p. 36-79.)

16. =Oliver=, _Sir_ Thomas.

 Dust and fume, foes of industrial life. 1912. (In Lancet, v. 183, p.
 865-871.)

17. =O’Connor=, John J. _jr._

 Is Progress being made against black smoke in Pittsburgh? Unpublished
 notes.

18. =P.=, W. E.

 The effect of weather on everyday life. 1899. (In Nature, v. 61, p.
 56-57.)

19. =Saito=, Yoichiro.

 Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die quantitative absorption von
 staub durch tiere bei genau bekanntem staubgehalt der heft. 7 dr.
 1912. (In Archiv für hygiene, v. 75, p. 134-151.)

20. =Shipley=, Maynard.

 Effects of immigration on homicide in American cities. 5 diag. 1906.
 (In Popular science monthly, v. 69, p. 160-174.)

 Crimes of violence in Chicago and New York. 1908. (In Popular science
 monthly, v. 73, p. 127-134.)

21. =Smith=, Bailie W. B.

 Should the domestic smoke nuisance be any longer tolerated? 3 diag.
 1912. (In Papers read at the Smoke Abatement Conferences, March ...
 1912, p. 62-67.)

22. =Smoke=. 1911. (In Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed., v. 25, p.
275-277.)

23. =Sunlight= in the Tropics. 1913. (In Journal of the American
Medical Association, v. 60, p. 208.)

24. =Sunshine=. 1911. (In Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed., Ill., v.
26, p. 106-110.)

25. =Wallin=, J. E. Wallace.

 Optical illusions of reversible perspective. 1905. p. 204-212.

26. =Ward=, Robert de Courcy.

 Climate. New York. 1908. 372 p.

27. =Weather= and mental action. 300 w. 1895. (In Popular science
monthly, v. 47, p. 568.)

28. =Weather= influences. 1868. (In Once a week, v. 19, p. 274-277.)

29. =Yerkes=, Robert M.

 The psychological aspects of illuminating engineering. 1910. (In
 Lectures on illuminating engineering, v. 2, p. 575-604.)


On the aesthetics of smoke

30. =Church=, _Sir_ Arthur.

 Notes on the action of coal smoke on building stones and mural
 paintings. 1912. (In Papers read at the Smoke Abatement Conferences,
 March ... 1912, p. 1-4.)

31. =Heaton=, Noel.

 Influence of smoke on decorations. 1912. (In Papers read at the Smoke
 Abatement Conferences, March ... 1912, p. 5-8.)

32. =Holden=, John.

 Pollution of air as affecting the architect and his work. 1888.
 (Manchester and Salford Noxious Vapors Association. Lectures on air
 pollution, no. 7, p. 87-96.)

33. =Holdsworth=, J. T.

 The smoke problem. 1912. (In Report of the Economic survey of
 Pittsburgh, p. 31-45.)

34. =Redfern=, Harry.

 Effect of coal smoke on buildings. 1912. (In Papers read at the Smoke
 Abatement Conferences, March ... 1912, p. 9-14.)

35. =Rideal=, S.

 Effects of town air on metal work. 1912. (In Papers read at the Smoke
 Abatement Conferences, March ... 1912, p. 15-20.)

36. =Wallin=, J. E. Wallace.

 The doctrine of formal discipline, two neglected instances of transfer
 of training. 1910. (In Journal of educational psychology, v. 1, p.
 168-171.)

 See discussion and references in Heck, W. H., Mental discipline and
 educational values. 1911.




Publications of the Smoke Investigation


Bulletin No. 1. Outline of the Smoke Investigation. 16 p. Free.

Bulletin No. 2. Bibliography of Smoke and Smoke Prevention. 164 p.
Fifty cents.

Bulletin No. 3. Psychological Aspects of the Problem of Atmospheric
Smoke Pollution. 46 p. Twenty-five cents.




Transcriber’s Notes

Page 6: “entry of soluable” changed to “entry of soluble”

Page 22: “inbalance or dioptric distortions” changed to “imbalance or
dioptric distortions”

Page 25: “mucuous membrane” changed to “mucous membrane”

Page 30: “worst smoke-effending” changed to “worst smoke-offending”

Page 35: “gods and godesses” changed to “gods and goddesses”

Page 36 & 42: “natural terrestial” changed to “natural terrestrial”

Page 44: “sur la végetation et les propriétés pathogènes” changed
to “sur la végétation et les propriétés pathogènes” “séances de
L’Academie” changed to “séances de L’Académie”



*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE PROBLEM OF ATMOSPHERIC SMOKE POLLUTION ***


    

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.


START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when
you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work
on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
    at www.gutenberg.org. If you
    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
  
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:

    • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
        the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
        to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
        Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
        Literary Archive Foundation.”
    
    • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™
        works.
    
    • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
        receipt of the work.
    
    • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
        distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
    

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right
of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.